Isolation and identification of some uncommon bacterial species isolated from different clinical sample

R. Faraj, Muhamed N Maarof
{"title":"Isolation and identification of some uncommon bacterial species isolated from different clinical sample","authors":"R. Faraj, Muhamed N Maarof","doi":"10.24271/GARMIAN.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many opportunistic bacterial species that are uncommon and infrequently exist inclinical specimen, most of them are difficult to routine identification, even some of them arepoorly documented in clinical specimen. also had no less role in the coordinates of the diseasethan common bacterial species. Six hundred and fifty samples were collected from patientsattending to some hospitals in Sulaimanya City and Kalar General Hospital during the periodfrom October 2015 to November 2016.Samples were firstly cultured on different media in order to isolate and identify bacterialisolates according to cultural characteristics, morphological features and biochemical reactions inaddition to Vitek 2 system for identifying uncommon and infrequent isolates. The identificationand susceptibility test were performed in Kalar General Hospital. Isolated 286(44%) bacterialstrains from different clinical samples, 125 of them were identified by Vitek 2 automatedsystem, while 23(8%) of isolates were considered as uncommon bacterial species.The antimicrobial susceptibility of uncommon isolates, showed significant variation againsttwenty four antibiotics. Four isolates; Acinatobacter baumanii, Acinatobacter calcoaceticus,Enterobacter ludwigii and Gemella sanguinis were resistant to all antibiotics. WhereasAerococcus urinae, (Citrobacter freundii and Alloiococcus otitis), (Morganella morganii,Sphingomonas paucimobilis, Pantoea agglomerans, Streptococcus sobrinus and Kocuria rosean.2), ( Ochrobactrum anthropi n.1 and Kocura kristinae), (Ochrobactrum anthropi n.2 andKocuria rosea n.1 ), (Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Citrobacter koseri ),(Aeromonas salmonicida and Micrococcus luteus n.1) and Micrococcus luteus (n.2) resistant tothe antibiotics as these percentages 95.8%, 91.6%, 87.5%, 83.3%, 79.1%, 70.8%, 66.6% and62.5%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":12283,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Study of Three Diagnostic Methods for Helicobacter pylori Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Study of Three Diagnostic Methods for Helicobacter pylori Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24271/GARMIAN.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are many opportunistic bacterial species that are uncommon and infrequently exist inclinical specimen, most of them are difficult to routine identification, even some of them arepoorly documented in clinical specimen. also had no less role in the coordinates of the diseasethan common bacterial species. Six hundred and fifty samples were collected from patientsattending to some hospitals in Sulaimanya City and Kalar General Hospital during the periodfrom October 2015 to November 2016.Samples were firstly cultured on different media in order to isolate and identify bacterialisolates according to cultural characteristics, morphological features and biochemical reactions inaddition to Vitek 2 system for identifying uncommon and infrequent isolates. The identificationand susceptibility test were performed in Kalar General Hospital. Isolated 286(44%) bacterialstrains from different clinical samples, 125 of them were identified by Vitek 2 automatedsystem, while 23(8%) of isolates were considered as uncommon bacterial species.The antimicrobial susceptibility of uncommon isolates, showed significant variation againsttwenty four antibiotics. Four isolates; Acinatobacter baumanii, Acinatobacter calcoaceticus,Enterobacter ludwigii and Gemella sanguinis were resistant to all antibiotics. WhereasAerococcus urinae, (Citrobacter freundii and Alloiococcus otitis), (Morganella morganii,Sphingomonas paucimobilis, Pantoea agglomerans, Streptococcus sobrinus and Kocuria rosean.2), ( Ochrobactrum anthropi n.1 and Kocura kristinae), (Ochrobactrum anthropi n.2 andKocuria rosea n.1 ), (Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Citrobacter koseri ),(Aeromonas salmonicida and Micrococcus luteus n.1) and Micrococcus luteus (n.2) resistant tothe antibiotics as these percentages 95.8%, 91.6%, 87.5%, 83.3%, 79.1%, 70.8%, 66.6% and62.5%, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从不同临床标本中分离出的罕见菌种的分离与鉴定
临床标本中存在着许多不常见、不常见的机会性细菌种类,其中大多数难以常规鉴定,甚至有些在临床标本中记录较少。在疾病坐标上的作用也不比普通细菌少。从2015年10月至2016年11月期间在苏莱曼尼亚市部分医院和卡拉尔总医院就诊的患者中采集了650份样本。首先将样品在不同培养基上培养,根据培养特性、形态特征和生化反应分离鉴定分离菌,并用Vitek 2系统鉴定罕见和罕见分离菌。鉴定和药敏试验在卡拉尔总医院进行。从不同临床样品中分离到286株(44%)细菌,其中125株经Vitek 2自动鉴定,23株(8%)为罕见菌。罕见菌株对24种抗生素的药敏差异显著。四个隔离;鲍曼动杆菌、钙酸动杆菌、路德维希肠杆菌和血芽孢杆菌对所有抗生素均耐药。其中,尿气球菌、弗氏柠檬酸杆菌和中耳炎异源球菌、摩根氏摩根杆菌、少动藻单胞菌、聚集pantoagglomerans、sobrincoccus和Kocuria roseans .2)、人类ochrobacbacterium n.1和kocurstinae)、人类ochrobacbacterium n.2和Kocuria rosestinae .1、stutzeri假单胞菌、荧光假单胞菌和koseri柠檬酸单胞菌、沙门氏菌气单胞菌和黄体微球菌1和黄体微球菌2对抗生素耐药的比例为95.8%;91.6%, 87.5%, 83.3%, 79.1%, 70.8%, 66.6% and62.5%,分别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Helicobacter Pylori Effect of overlap technique on hardness and fatigue behavior in ND-Glass laser heat treatment of carbon steel Localization and Some Properties of Certain Types of Modules Synthesis and Characterization of Some Hydroxylated Chalcones by using BF3.Et2O via Claisen-Schmidt Condensation Isolation and identification of some uncommon bacterial species isolated from different clinical sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1