Qualitative planning philosophy and the governance of urban revitalization, a plea for cultural diversity

Carlos J.L. Balsas
{"title":"Qualitative planning philosophy and the governance of urban revitalization, a plea for cultural diversity","authors":"Carlos J.L. Balsas","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2022.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urban revitalization is a substantive area of Urban and Regional Planning philosophy. Culture, arts and entertainment, and urban innovation have assumed a growing importance in urban revitalization. However, there is need to clarify the basis of research endeavors in this area. This paper analyses how downtown revitalization governance has evolved in recent decades. A thorough discussion on the causality of qualitative planning research to study urban revitalization is provided. The paper's approach builds upon various contradictions surrounding culture-based urban policies. Although, it concentrates mostly on the use of cultural mega events in Europe, it recognizes that a main research limitation is the paucity of published research on similar events of alternative cultures in other parts of the world. The paper identifies three main findings: The evolution of downtown revitalization has caused a substantial body of knowledge, which includes myths to be dispelled, and areas of proven success; in spite of various contradictions, downtown cultural policy has been used mostly as a form of civic boosterism; and qualitative planning research methods are critical to study empowering urban revitalization which has liberating city and culture developments at its core.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 247-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328622000456/pdfft?md5=c7edf7bf108b0faf34cf0b5f297279a6&pid=1-s2.0-S2664328622000456-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328622000456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Urban revitalization is a substantive area of Urban and Regional Planning philosophy. Culture, arts and entertainment, and urban innovation have assumed a growing importance in urban revitalization. However, there is need to clarify the basis of research endeavors in this area. This paper analyses how downtown revitalization governance has evolved in recent decades. A thorough discussion on the causality of qualitative planning research to study urban revitalization is provided. The paper's approach builds upon various contradictions surrounding culture-based urban policies. Although, it concentrates mostly on the use of cultural mega events in Europe, it recognizes that a main research limitation is the paucity of published research on similar events of alternative cultures in other parts of the world. The paper identifies three main findings: The evolution of downtown revitalization has caused a substantial body of knowledge, which includes myths to be dispelled, and areas of proven success; in spite of various contradictions, downtown cultural policy has been used mostly as a form of civic boosterism; and qualitative planning research methods are critical to study empowering urban revitalization which has liberating city and culture developments at its core.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定性规划理念与城市振兴治理,呼吁文化多样性
城市振兴是城市与区域规划哲学的一个实质性领域。文化、艺术、娱乐和城市创新在城市振兴中的重要性日益增强。然而,有必要澄清这一领域的研究基础。本文分析了近几十年来闹市振兴治理的演变过程。对定性规划研究在城市振兴研究中的因果关系进行了深入探讨。本文的方法建立在围绕文化城市政策的各种矛盾之上。虽然,它主要集中在欧洲文化大型活动的使用上,但它认识到一个主要的研究限制是缺乏对世界其他地区替代文化的类似事件的发表研究。本文确定了三个主要发现:市中心振兴的演变已经产生了大量的知识体系,其中包括需要消除的神话和已被证明成功的领域;尽管存在各种矛盾,但市中心的文化政策主要是作为一种公民支持的形式;而定性规划研究方法对于研究以解放城市和文化发展为核心的赋权城市振兴至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Households’ access and expenditure on water services: Examining intra-urban differences in the Accra metropolis, Ghana Reimagining cities as self-organising capital creating ecosystems Urban resilience: Multidimensional perspectives, challenges and prospects for future research Looking into urban toponymic verticality: An initial note Tracking the adoption of sustainable trash disposal practices: Evidence from Benin’s waste management amid urbanization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1