IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TPACK FRAMEWORK TO MEASURE INTEGRATION OF TECHNOLOGY, PEDAGOGY AND THE CONTENT OF LECTURERS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

H. Nindiasari, Nena Restiana, A. S. Pamungkas
{"title":"IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TPACK FRAMEWORK TO MEASURE INTEGRATION OF TECHNOLOGY, PEDAGOGY AND THE CONTENT OF LECTURERS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION","authors":"H. Nindiasari, Nena Restiana, A. S. Pamungkas","doi":"10.31000/PRIMA.V5I2.4158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the obstacles using technology is the lack of teacher understanding of technology, therefore this study aims to determine the understanding of lecturers of mathematics education on the integration of technology in learning using the TPACK (Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge) framework, a few of research that applying TPACK in universities. Furthermore, the both effect of gender and age of teaching on TPACK were analyzed on TPACK using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results of this study are Power point applications are technologies that are widely used by mathematics education lecturers by 40.9%. PCK, PK and CK components have a strong positive effect on TPACK perceptions of mathematics education lecturers. The average value of TPACK components is TK 3.95; CK 4.01; PK 4.08; 4.02 PCK; TCK 4.04; TPK 4.02; TPACK 3.96. For an in-depth analysis of gender and age of teaching factors on the TPACK component. This study found that gender and duration of teaching was no significant influence between the understanding of mathematics education lecturers and the seven components of TPACK.","PeriodicalId":33718,"journal":{"name":"Prima Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prima Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31000/PRIMA.V5I2.4158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the obstacles using technology is the lack of teacher understanding of technology, therefore this study aims to determine the understanding of lecturers of mathematics education on the integration of technology in learning using the TPACK (Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge) framework, a few of research that applying TPACK in universities. Furthermore, the both effect of gender and age of teaching on TPACK were analyzed on TPACK using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results of this study are Power point applications are technologies that are widely used by mathematics education lecturers by 40.9%. PCK, PK and CK components have a strong positive effect on TPACK perceptions of mathematics education lecturers. The average value of TPACK components is TK 3.95; CK 4.01; PK 4.08; 4.02 PCK; TCK 4.04; TPK 4.02; TPACK 3.96. For an in-depth analysis of gender and age of teaching factors on the TPACK component. This study found that gender and duration of teaching was no significant influence between the understanding of mathematics education lecturers and the seven components of TPACK.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用tpack框架衡量数学教育中技术、教学法和讲师内容的整合
使用技术的障碍之一是教师缺乏对技术的理解,因此本研究旨在确定数学教育讲师对使用TPACK (Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge)框架整合技术在学习中的理解,以及一些在大学中应用TPACK的研究。此外,采用方差分析(ANOVA)分析性别和教学年龄对TPACK的影响。本研究结果显示,40.9%的数学教育讲师广泛使用ppt应用技术。PCK、PK和CK成分对数学教育教师的TPACK感知有较强的正向影响。TPACK各分量的平均值为TK 3.95;CK 4.01;PK 4.08;4.02 PCK;TCK 4.04;TPK 4.02;TPACK 3.96。深入分析了性别和年龄对TPACK构成的教学影响因素。本研究发现,性别和教学时间对数学教育讲师对TPACK七个组成部分的理解没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
EXPLORATION OF BATIK JAMBI ON LEARNING TRANSFORMATION GEOMETRY THE INFLUENCE OF SELF-CONFIDENCE ON THE MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS MATH ANXIETY AS A PREDICTOR OF MATH COMMUNICATION ABILITY ON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ERROR ANALYSIS IN SOLVING GEOMETRY PROBLEMS BASED ON NEWMAN'S ERROR ANALYSIS REVIEWED FROM LEARNING STYLES MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY IN VIEW OF LEARNING STYLES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1