Influence of seat belt use behavior and road traffic crash experience on the use of child restraint systems: A step further

Farhan Muhammad Butt, M.A. Dalhat, Khurram Shahid Minhas, Abdulhamid Al-mojil
{"title":"Influence of seat belt use behavior and road traffic crash experience on the use of child restraint systems: A step further","authors":"Farhan Muhammad Butt,&nbsp;M.A. Dalhat,&nbsp;Khurram Shahid Minhas,&nbsp;Abdulhamid Al-mojil","doi":"10.1016/j.jksues.2021.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seat belts and child restraint systems (CRS) are important in-car safety components capable of preventing serious injuries and death in the event of a car crash. Low rates of seat belt and CRS use persist globally, particularly in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). In an effort to better understand and subsequently improve seat belt and CRS use rates, this study analyzed the factors influencing seat belt and CRS use behavior in the Eastern Province (EP) of KSA, including the connection between seat belt and CRS use and road traffic crash experience.</p><p>This cross-sectional study was based on a survey of 3,421 male and female participants regarding their seat belt and CRS use behavior. Respondents were classified into four CRS use categories: <em>cautious</em>, <em>helplessly negligent</em>, <em>ignorantly negligent</em>, and <em>deliberately negligent</em>. Chi-squared tests were used to determine significant associations among seat belt use, seat belt belief, prior crash experience, CRS use, and demographic variables. Multinomial nominal logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios for classification in one of the three negligent vs. <em>cautious</em> CRS use categories as a function of demographic variables, prior road traffic crash experience, and belief in and use of seat belts.</p><p>Results of this study indicated a modest improvement in the rate of seat belt use in KSA’s EP, however, a significant proportion of respondents reported only <em>sometimes</em> or <em>never</em> using their seat belt. A significant proportion of respondents were also classified in one of the three negligent CRS use categories. Respondents who reported using a seat belt <em>sometimes</em> or <em>never</em> were 2.67, 2.60, and 3.48 times more likely to be categorized as <em>deliberately negligent</em>, <em>ignorantly negligent</em>, or <em>helplessly negligent</em> in their CRS use, respectively, than respondents who reported <em>always</em> using their seat belts. Respondents who reported being previously involved in a car crash or a near crash were also more likely to be classified in one of the three negligent CRS use categories than respondents who reported no prior road traffic crash experience. Previous involvement in a car crash was also found to be associated with lower seat belt and CRS use rates.</p><p>These findings suggest a need for increased seat belt law enforcement by the KSA’s Traffic Police Department, as well as additional seat belt and CRS use awareness campaigns targeting individuals with prior road traffic crash experience by the KSA’s Ministry of Communications through the Road Transport Department. This study can serve as a reference for future studies that aim to understand the factors and implications related to seat belt use and belief, CRS use, and road traffic crash experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences","volume":"36 1","pages":"Pages 9-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018363921000970/pdfft?md5=41541ce717b36bc31cf57245c1e4166b&pid=1-s2.0-S1018363921000970-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018363921000970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seat belts and child restraint systems (CRS) are important in-car safety components capable of preventing serious injuries and death in the event of a car crash. Low rates of seat belt and CRS use persist globally, particularly in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). In an effort to better understand and subsequently improve seat belt and CRS use rates, this study analyzed the factors influencing seat belt and CRS use behavior in the Eastern Province (EP) of KSA, including the connection between seat belt and CRS use and road traffic crash experience.

This cross-sectional study was based on a survey of 3,421 male and female participants regarding their seat belt and CRS use behavior. Respondents were classified into four CRS use categories: cautious, helplessly negligent, ignorantly negligent, and deliberately negligent. Chi-squared tests were used to determine significant associations among seat belt use, seat belt belief, prior crash experience, CRS use, and demographic variables. Multinomial nominal logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios for classification in one of the three negligent vs. cautious CRS use categories as a function of demographic variables, prior road traffic crash experience, and belief in and use of seat belts.

Results of this study indicated a modest improvement in the rate of seat belt use in KSA’s EP, however, a significant proportion of respondents reported only sometimes or never using their seat belt. A significant proportion of respondents were also classified in one of the three negligent CRS use categories. Respondents who reported using a seat belt sometimes or never were 2.67, 2.60, and 3.48 times more likely to be categorized as deliberately negligent, ignorantly negligent, or helplessly negligent in their CRS use, respectively, than respondents who reported always using their seat belts. Respondents who reported being previously involved in a car crash or a near crash were also more likely to be classified in one of the three negligent CRS use categories than respondents who reported no prior road traffic crash experience. Previous involvement in a car crash was also found to be associated with lower seat belt and CRS use rates.

These findings suggest a need for increased seat belt law enforcement by the KSA’s Traffic Police Department, as well as additional seat belt and CRS use awareness campaigns targeting individuals with prior road traffic crash experience by the KSA’s Ministry of Communications through the Road Transport Department. This study can serve as a reference for future studies that aim to understand the factors and implications related to seat belt use and belief, CRS use, and road traffic crash experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用安全带的行为和道路交通事故经验对使用儿童约束系统的影响:更进一步
安全带和儿童约束系统(CRS)是重要的车内安全部件,能够在发生车祸时防止严重伤亡事故。在全球范围内,安全带和儿童约束系统的使用率一直很低,尤其是在沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)。为了更好地了解并提高安全带和CRS的使用率,本研究分析了影响沙特阿拉伯东部省(EP)安全带和CRS使用行为的因素,包括安全带和CRS的使用与道路交通事故经历之间的联系。这项横断面研究基于对3421名男性和女性参与者进行的关于安全带和CRS使用行为的调查。受访者被分为四个使用 CRS 的类别:谨慎、无奈疏忽、无知疏忽和故意疏忽。我们使用卡方检验来确定安全带使用、安全带信仰、先前的撞车经历、CRS 使用和人口统计学变量之间的显著关联。研究采用多项式名义逻辑回归法,估算了因人口统计学变量、之前的道路交通事故经历、对安全带的信仰和使用情况而被归入疏忽与谨慎使用 CRS 这三个类别之一的几率比。相当一部分受访者还被归入疏忽使用 CRS 的三个类别之一。与经常使用安全带的受访者相比,偶尔或从不使用安全带的受访者被归类为故意疏忽、无知疏忽或无奈疏忽使用 CRS 的可能性分别高出 2.67 倍、2.60 倍和 3.48 倍。与没有经历过道路交通事故的受访者相比,曾经发生过车祸或险些发生车祸的受访者也更有可能被归入疏忽使用 CRS 的三个类别之一。这些研究结果表明,叙利亚交通警察局有必要加强安全带的执法力度,叙利亚交通部也有必要通过道路运输局针对有过道路交通事故经历的人开展更多的安全带和CRS使用宣传活动。本研究可为今后旨在了解与安全带使用和信念、CRS 使用以及道路交通事故经历相关的因素和影响的研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences
Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences (JKSUES) is a peer-reviewed journal published quarterly. It is hosted and published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. JKSUES is devoted to a wide range of sub-fields in the Engineering Sciences and JKSUES welcome articles of interdisciplinary nature.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Exploring the critical frequent factors of rework and assigning strategies to mitigate their occurrence in the Egyptian construction projects Understanding the impacts of binary additives on the mechanical and morphological response of ameliorated soil for road infrastructures Application of soil-based low-impact development system for Flash Flood management of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Static and dynamic characterization of fiber reinforced sand: A numerical investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1