The Political Power of Twitter

J. Usher, Pierpaolo Dondio, Lucía Morales
{"title":"The Political Power of Twitter","authors":"J. Usher, Pierpaolo Dondio, Lucía Morales","doi":"10.1145/3350546.3352541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In June 2016, the British voted by 52 per cent to leave the EU, a club the UK joined in 1973. This paper examines Twitter public and political party discourse surrounding the BREXIT withdrawal agreement. In particular, we focus on tweets from four different BREXIT exit strategies known as “Norway”, “Article 50”, the “Backstop” and “No Deal” and their effect on the pound and FTSE 100 index from the period of December 10th 2018 to February 24th 2019. Our approach focuses on using a Naive Bayes classification algorithm to assess political party and public Twitter sentiment. A Granger causality analysis is then introduced to investigate the hypothesis that BREXIT public sentiment, as measured by the twitter sentiment time series, is indicative of changes in the GBP/EUR Fx and FTSE 100 Index. Our results from the Twitter public sentiment indicate that the accuracy of the “Article 50” scenario had the single biggest effect on short run dynamics on the FTSE 100 index, additionally the “Norway” BREXIT strategy has a marginal effect on the FTSE 100 index whilst there was no significant causation to the GBP/EUR Fx. The BREXIT Political party sentiment for the “No Deal” was indicative of short-term dynamics on the GBP/EUR Fx at a marginal rate. Our test concluded that there was no causality on the FTSE 100.","PeriodicalId":6513,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3350546.3352541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In June 2016, the British voted by 52 per cent to leave the EU, a club the UK joined in 1973. This paper examines Twitter public and political party discourse surrounding the BREXIT withdrawal agreement. In particular, we focus on tweets from four different BREXIT exit strategies known as “Norway”, “Article 50”, the “Backstop” and “No Deal” and their effect on the pound and FTSE 100 index from the period of December 10th 2018 to February 24th 2019. Our approach focuses on using a Naive Bayes classification algorithm to assess political party and public Twitter sentiment. A Granger causality analysis is then introduced to investigate the hypothesis that BREXIT public sentiment, as measured by the twitter sentiment time series, is indicative of changes in the GBP/EUR Fx and FTSE 100 Index. Our results from the Twitter public sentiment indicate that the accuracy of the “Article 50” scenario had the single biggest effect on short run dynamics on the FTSE 100 index, additionally the “Norway” BREXIT strategy has a marginal effect on the FTSE 100 index whilst there was no significant causation to the GBP/EUR Fx. The BREXIT Political party sentiment for the “No Deal” was indicative of short-term dynamics on the GBP/EUR Fx at a marginal rate. Our test concluded that there was no causality on the FTSE 100.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推特的政治力量
2016年6月,英国以52%的投票结果决定退出欧盟(EU)。英国于1973年加入欧盟。本文研究了围绕英国脱欧协议的推特公众和政党话语。我们特别关注了2018年12月10日至2019年2月24日期间,来自四种不同脱欧策略的推文,即“挪威”、“第50条”、“后备方案”和“无协议脱欧”,以及它们对英镑和富时100指数的影响。我们的方法侧重于使用朴素贝叶斯分类算法来评估政党和公众Twitter情绪。然后引入格兰杰因果分析来调查假设英国脱欧公众情绪,由推特情绪时间序列衡量,指示英镑/欧元外汇和富时100指数的变化。我们从推特公众情绪得出的结果表明,“第50条”情景的准确性对富时100指数的短期动态影响最大,此外,“挪威”脱欧策略对富时100指数有边际影响,而对英镑/欧元外汇没有显著的因果关系。英国政党对“无协议脱欧”的情绪表明,英镑/欧元外汇的短期动态处于边际汇率。我们的测试得出的结论是,富时100指数之间没有因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Political Power of Twitter IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence A Distributed Approach to Constructing Travel Solutions by Exploiting Web Resources Joint Model of Topics, Expertises, Activities and Trends for Question Answering Web Applications A Multi-context BDI Recommender System: From Theory to Simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1