Matched Cohort Study of Open Thoracostomies Performed by Ground Medics

Alison A Smith, A. Ciaraglia, Benjamin Axtman, CJ Winckler, D. Wampler, Maxwell A. Braverman, C. P. Shahan, Rachelle Babbitt Jonas, Michael Shiels, B. Eastridge, Ronald M Stewart, Susannah E. Nicholson, Donald J. Jenkins
{"title":"Matched Cohort Study of Open Thoracostomies Performed by Ground Medics","authors":"Alison A Smith, A. Ciaraglia, Benjamin Axtman, CJ Winckler, D. Wampler, Maxwell A. Braverman, C. P. Shahan, Rachelle Babbitt Jonas, Michael Shiels, B. Eastridge, Ronald M Stewart, Susannah E. Nicholson, Donald J. Jenkins","doi":"10.56068/qmbv3502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tension pneumothorax resulting from chest trauma is a rapidly fatal condition that requires prompt treatment.  Prehospital open thoracostomy (POT) is a potentially lifesaving intervention that can be performed in the field to treat tension pneumothorax. However, the results from POT performed by ground EMS providers have not been well-studied. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients with chest trauma who underwent POT performed by ground EMS providers with a matched cohort who did not undergo this procedure in the field. \nMethods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive adult patients presenting to a Level I trauma center with chest trauma were analyzed from 2017-2020. Outcomes were compared to a patient cohort who did not undergo POT matched by severity of injury and prehospital CPR. \nResults: A total of 14 POT patients were identified.  Majority of POT were bilateral (n=11/14, 78.6%) and all of these patients (n=14/14) had prehospital cardiac arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation was obtained in 2 patients with penetrating injuries (14.3%). There was no difference in total and scene EMS time compared to the matched cohort without POT (p>0.05). \nConclusions: This study demonstrated that open thoracostomies could be performed by ground EMS units without increasing prehospital time for severely injured trauma patients and greater achievement of ROSC. Larger, prospective, multi-institutional analyses are needed to further evaluate outcomes.","PeriodicalId":73465,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paramedicine","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56068/qmbv3502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tension pneumothorax resulting from chest trauma is a rapidly fatal condition that requires prompt treatment.  Prehospital open thoracostomy (POT) is a potentially lifesaving intervention that can be performed in the field to treat tension pneumothorax. However, the results from POT performed by ground EMS providers have not been well-studied. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients with chest trauma who underwent POT performed by ground EMS providers with a matched cohort who did not undergo this procedure in the field. Methods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive adult patients presenting to a Level I trauma center with chest trauma were analyzed from 2017-2020. Outcomes were compared to a patient cohort who did not undergo POT matched by severity of injury and prehospital CPR. Results: A total of 14 POT patients were identified.  Majority of POT were bilateral (n=11/14, 78.6%) and all of these patients (n=14/14) had prehospital cardiac arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation was obtained in 2 patients with penetrating injuries (14.3%). There was no difference in total and scene EMS time compared to the matched cohort without POT (p>0.05). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that open thoracostomies could be performed by ground EMS units without increasing prehospital time for severely injured trauma patients and greater achievement of ROSC. Larger, prospective, multi-institutional analyses are needed to further evaluate outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地面医务人员开胸手术的匹配队列研究
背景:胸外伤引起的紧张性气胸是一种迅速致命的疾病,需要及时治疗。院前开胸术(POT)是一种潜在的挽救生命的干预措施,可以在现场进行治疗张力性气胸。然而,由地面EMS提供者实施的POT的结果尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是比较由地面EMS服务提供者进行POT治疗的胸外伤患者与未在现场进行POT治疗的匹配队列患者的结果。方法:回顾性分析2017-2020年在一级创伤中心连续就诊的胸部创伤成人患者的病历。结果与未接受POT的患者队列进行比较,这些患者与损伤严重程度和院前CPR相匹配。结果:共鉴定出14例POT患者。大多数POT为双侧(n=11/14, 78.6%),所有患者(n=14/14)均发生院前心脏骤停。穿透性损伤2例(14.3%)恢复自发循环。与对照组相比,总EMS时间和现场EMS时间均无差异(p>0.05)。结论:本研究表明,地面EMS可以在不增加严重创伤患者院前时间的情况下进行开胸手术,并且可以实现更高的ROSC。需要更大的、前瞻性的、多机构的分析来进一步评估结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantifying Threat or Challenge Response of Undergraduate Paramedicine Students During High-Stress Clinical Scenarios The State of Emergency Medical Services Clinician Mental Health in Virginia Demonstration of Doppler Ultrasound Pulse Detection by Trained Prehospital Personnel Influence of Rurality When Accessing Emergency Healthcare During Exacerbation of Asthma Paramedicine Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1