The Effect of the Transfusion Protocol on Transfusion Rates and Short-term Outcomes of Preterm Infants in a Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

E. Okulu, Yasemin Ezgi Kostekci, Elvis Kraja, O. Erdeve, S. Arsan, B. Atasay
{"title":"The Effect of the Transfusion Protocol on Transfusion Rates and Short-term Outcomes of Preterm Infants in a Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit","authors":"E. Okulu, Yasemin Ezgi Kostekci, Elvis Kraja, O. Erdeve, S. Arsan, B. Atasay","doi":"10.18502/ijpho.v11i4.7170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to compare the epochs before and after the revision of the transfusion guideline, and determine their effects on transfusion rates and short-term outcomes in preterm infants. \nMaterials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the effect of the new transfusion guideline. Infants who were born <32 weeks of gestation and received red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in their first 6-weeks of life were divided into two epochs according to adopting the new transfusion guideline. The demographic and clinical data of the patients were compared between these two periods. \nResults: Fifty-six infants were included (Period 1, n=22; Period, n=34). The number of transfusions, total and cumulative volume of the transfusions were similar in the two periods. There was an inverse relationship between the gestational age and the number of transfusions in both periods (r=-0.575, p=0.005, and r=-0.494, p=0.003), and there was an inverse relationship between the birth weight and the number of transfusions in period 2 (r=-0.423, p=0.013). The ratio of total phlebotomy volume to estimated total blood volume was higher in period 2 (p=0.029). There was a direct relationship between the phlebotomy loss and volume of RBC transfused in period 2 (r=0.487, p=0.003). The incidence of morbidities was similar in the two periods. \nConclusion: Changing only the transfusion protocol did not decrease the transfusion number. Although transfusion guidelines were adopted rigorously, it seems to be impossible to reduce RBC transfusion rates unless anemia prevention strategies were also in place.","PeriodicalId":44212,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijpho.v11i4.7170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the epochs before and after the revision of the transfusion guideline, and determine their effects on transfusion rates and short-term outcomes in preterm infants. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the effect of the new transfusion guideline. Infants who were born <32 weeks of gestation and received red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in their first 6-weeks of life were divided into two epochs according to adopting the new transfusion guideline. The demographic and clinical data of the patients were compared between these two periods. Results: Fifty-six infants were included (Period 1, n=22; Period, n=34). The number of transfusions, total and cumulative volume of the transfusions were similar in the two periods. There was an inverse relationship between the gestational age and the number of transfusions in both periods (r=-0.575, p=0.005, and r=-0.494, p=0.003), and there was an inverse relationship between the birth weight and the number of transfusions in period 2 (r=-0.423, p=0.013). The ratio of total phlebotomy volume to estimated total blood volume was higher in period 2 (p=0.029). There was a direct relationship between the phlebotomy loss and volume of RBC transfused in period 2 (r=0.487, p=0.003). The incidence of morbidities was similar in the two periods. Conclusion: Changing only the transfusion protocol did not decrease the transfusion number. Although transfusion guidelines were adopted rigorously, it seems to be impossible to reduce RBC transfusion rates unless anemia prevention strategies were also in place.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输血方案对三级新生儿重症监护室早产儿输血率和短期预后的影响
背景:本研究的目的是比较输血指南修订前后的时代,并确定其对早产儿输血率和短期结局的影响。材料与方法:回顾性研究新输血指南的效果。妊娠<32周出生并在出生后6周内接受红细胞(RBC)输血的婴儿根据采用新的输血指南分为两个时期。比较两期患者的人口学和临床资料。结果:纳入56例婴儿(第一阶段,n=22;期间,n = 34)。两期输血次数、总输血量和累计输血量相似。两期的胎龄与输血次数呈负相关(r=-0.575, p=0.005, r=-0.494, p=0.003),第二期的出生体重与输血次数呈负相关(r=-0.423, p=0.013)。总放血量与估计总血容量之比在第2期较高(p=0.029)。第2期放血损失与输血量有直接关系(r=0.487, p=0.003)。两个时期的发病率相似。结论:仅改变输血方案并不能减少输血次数。虽然输血指南被严格采用,但似乎不可能降低红细胞输血率,除非贫血预防策略也到位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Effects of deferoxamine versus deferasirox on hematology and liver parameters in children with beta-thalassemia major: A cross-sectional study from a single center Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura: An uncommon manifestation of Hepatitis A with acute liver failure Frequency of Red Cell Alloimmunization in Patients with Thalassemia Major: A Report from the Southwest of Iran Parvovirus B19 Infection May Potentially Determine the Fate of Hematopoiesis by Altering the Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Differentiation Estimation of Secondary Cancer Risk of Radiosensitive Organs for Leukemia from Head Radiotherapy in Pediatric Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1