Excavating Theatre History: Text, Performance and Biographies

IF 2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Women-A Cultural Review Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/09574042.2023.2241751
Ciara O’Dowd
{"title":"Excavating Theatre History: Text, Performance and Biographies","authors":"Ciara O’Dowd","doi":"10.1080/09574042.2023.2241751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"James Pethica is a name famous in the scholarship of Irish theatre; his work has long been deemed crucial to an understanding of the Irish Literary Revival and the establishment of the Abbey Theatre as the country’s National Theatre. In 1988, Pethica wrote a landmark essay which asserted that Lady Augusta Gregory was, in fact, a co-author of Yeats’ seminal play Cathleen Ní Houlihan. He marshalled archival and other evidence to argue that Gregory was not simply a patron, but her ideas and writing were fundamental contributions to the form and content of the text. In chapter two of this fascinating volume, Brewer Redwine notes that Pethica’s argument was not a new discovery; the same substantiated argument had been made by Elizabeth Coxhead in 1962 (21). Yet, Pethica is consistently credited with this revelation. Subtly and without a glimmer of disrespect, Brewer Redwine picks apart the accepted history to reinsert the important work of a female scholar into the narrative of academic scholarship. This is, one comes to realize on reading her book, a characteristic move; it is one the author carries out with elegance at regular intervals. She diligently excavates Irish theatre history to reveal vital truths that have always been there, but never acknowledged as meaningful. While the facts and clues have been available, it is in the assiduous, inherently feminist work of picking apart the presented story and piecing the facts back together, while also laying bare this excavation process, that she presents a compelling counter-narrative of authorship at the Abbey Theatre. There is a wealth of scholarship on the social history of Ireland’s Abbey Theatre and how issues of class and political nationalism sparked the crucible from which the theatre emerged (Pilkington; Morash; Grene). Elizabeth Brewer Redwine, Gender, Performance, and Authorship at the Abbey Theatre, Oxford: Oxford UP, 2021, HB £60, 240 pages, ISBN: 9780192896346","PeriodicalId":54053,"journal":{"name":"Women-A Cultural Review","volume":"61 1","pages":"244 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women-A Cultural Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2023.2241751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

James Pethica is a name famous in the scholarship of Irish theatre; his work has long been deemed crucial to an understanding of the Irish Literary Revival and the establishment of the Abbey Theatre as the country’s National Theatre. In 1988, Pethica wrote a landmark essay which asserted that Lady Augusta Gregory was, in fact, a co-author of Yeats’ seminal play Cathleen Ní Houlihan. He marshalled archival and other evidence to argue that Gregory was not simply a patron, but her ideas and writing were fundamental contributions to the form and content of the text. In chapter two of this fascinating volume, Brewer Redwine notes that Pethica’s argument was not a new discovery; the same substantiated argument had been made by Elizabeth Coxhead in 1962 (21). Yet, Pethica is consistently credited with this revelation. Subtly and without a glimmer of disrespect, Brewer Redwine picks apart the accepted history to reinsert the important work of a female scholar into the narrative of academic scholarship. This is, one comes to realize on reading her book, a characteristic move; it is one the author carries out with elegance at regular intervals. She diligently excavates Irish theatre history to reveal vital truths that have always been there, but never acknowledged as meaningful. While the facts and clues have been available, it is in the assiduous, inherently feminist work of picking apart the presented story and piecing the facts back together, while also laying bare this excavation process, that she presents a compelling counter-narrative of authorship at the Abbey Theatre. There is a wealth of scholarship on the social history of Ireland’s Abbey Theatre and how issues of class and political nationalism sparked the crucible from which the theatre emerged (Pilkington; Morash; Grene). Elizabeth Brewer Redwine, Gender, Performance, and Authorship at the Abbey Theatre, Oxford: Oxford UP, 2021, HB £60, 240 pages, ISBN: 9780192896346
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挖掘戏剧史:文本、表演和传记
詹姆斯·佩西卡是爱尔兰戏剧界著名的学者;长期以来,他的作品被认为对理解爱尔兰文学复兴和艾比剧院作为国家剧院的建立至关重要。1988年,佩西卡写了一篇具有里程碑意义的文章,声称奥古斯塔·格雷戈里夫人实际上是叶芝影响深远的戏剧凯瑟琳Ní Houlihan的合著者。他整理了档案和其他证据,认为格列高利不仅仅是一个赞助人,她的思想和写作对文本的形式和内容都做出了根本性的贡献。在这本引人入胜的书的第二章中,布鲁尔·雷德维恩指出,佩西卡的论点并不是一个新发现;伊丽莎白·考克斯黑德(Elizabeth Coxhead)在1962年也提出了同样的论证(21)。然而,佩西卡一直被认为是这个启示的创造者。布鲁尔·雷德维恩巧妙而不带一丝不尊重地将公认的历史拆解开来,将一位女性学者的重要作品重新插入学术研究的叙述中。读她的书,你会意识到,这是一个有特色的举动;这是作者每隔一段时间就优雅地完成的任务。她孜孜不倦地挖掘爱尔兰戏剧史,揭示了一直存在但从未被认为有意义的重要真相。虽然事实和线索都是可以获得的,但正是在她孜孜不倦、固有的女权主义工作中,她拆解了所呈现的故事,并将事实拼凑在一起,同时也揭示了这一挖掘过程,她在艾比剧院呈现了一种令人信服的反作者叙事。关于爱尔兰阿比剧院的社会史,以及阶级和政治民族主义问题如何引发剧院诞生的严峻考验,有大量的学术研究(皮尔金顿;Morash;Grene)。伊丽莎白布鲁尔红葡萄酒,性别,性能和作者在修道院剧院,牛津:牛津UP, 2021年,HB£60,240页,ISBN: 9780192896346
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Women-A Cultural Review
Women-A Cultural Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
About Our Contributors Living with the Ancestors Feminist Depictions of Coercive Control in ‘Domestic Noir’: Ilsa Evans’s Broken (2007) and Kathryn Heyman’s Storm and Grace (2017) Colonized Brown Motherhood: Em and the Big Hoom, Imelda and Indian Mothering Introduction: Imagining and Reimagining Emotional Labour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1