{"title":"Medieval Anticlericalism: Terms and Conditions","authors":"R. Swanson","doi":"10.1086/714917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article grapples with the problem of applying a nineteenth-century neologism to the relationships between clergy and laity within pre-Reformation Catholicism, essentially between circa 1100 and circa 1530. Broad approaches to the history of “anticlericalism” identify a major shift in its character at the Reformation, without being specific about its nature. Historians employ “anticlericalism” as an analytical concept, but somewhat insecurely, referring sometimes to criticism of the behavior of individual clerics, sometimes to a more fundamental critique of church institutions and practices. While accepting that the vocabulary of “anticlericalism” is now too embedded in medievalist scholarship to be eliminated, the article argues for greater care and precision among medievalists in its use, especially if it is to be transposed from its Western origins to serve as an analytical concept for the “global middle ages.”","PeriodicalId":45784,"journal":{"name":"HISTORY OF RELIGIONS","volume":"66 1","pages":"6 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORY OF RELIGIONS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/714917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article grapples with the problem of applying a nineteenth-century neologism to the relationships between clergy and laity within pre-Reformation Catholicism, essentially between circa 1100 and circa 1530. Broad approaches to the history of “anticlericalism” identify a major shift in its character at the Reformation, without being specific about its nature. Historians employ “anticlericalism” as an analytical concept, but somewhat insecurely, referring sometimes to criticism of the behavior of individual clerics, sometimes to a more fundamental critique of church institutions and practices. While accepting that the vocabulary of “anticlericalism” is now too embedded in medievalist scholarship to be eliminated, the article argues for greater care and precision among medievalists in its use, especially if it is to be transposed from its Western origins to serve as an analytical concept for the “global middle ages.”
期刊介绍:
For nearly fifty years, History of Religions has set the standard for the study of religious phenomena from prehistory to modern times. History of Religions strives to publish scholarship that reflects engagement with particular traditions, places, and times and yet also speaks to broader methodological and/or theoretical issues in the study of religion. Toward encouraging critical conversations in the field, HR also publishes review articles and comprehensive book reviews by distinguished authors.