Shear behaviour of infilled rock joints under different boundary conditions

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-04-07 DOI:10.1680/jgeen.21.00060
A. Shrivastava, K. S. Rao
{"title":"Shear behaviour of infilled rock joints under different boundary conditions","authors":"A. Shrivastava, K. S. Rao","doi":"10.1680/jgeen.21.00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently use of commercial software for analysis and design of rock slopes, underground structures, mining projects, the foundation of any infrastructure projects, piles, etc. becoming more popular and widely used. But sometimes, this software has many limitations and cannot be used directly for finding out the strength and deformation behavior of rock joints when joints are subjected to external load because of the construction of different projects. Correct prediction of strength and deformation behavior of rock joints are important for safe, economical, and sustainable design. In the present work, strength and deformation behavior of unfilled and infilled rock joints have been studied numerically by using one of the commercial software Universal Distinct Element Code (UDEC) under different boundary conditions like constant normal stiffness (CNS) and constant normal load (CNL) boundary conditions. The numerical model results are compared with experimental results of the test performed on a physical model. The strength predicted by the numerical model is in close agreement with experimental results at low initial normal stress and for CNL boundary conditions, as the asperity degradation during shearing process is almost same throughout the test. The numerical model cannot correctly predict the shear strength of rock joints under CNS boundary conditions and at high normal stress for both CNL and CNS conditions, because of the degradation in the asperity during shearing process and available model dosenot consider this effect. Hence, UDEC code has been modified in the present study for its acceptability under both CNL and CNS boundary conditins and at high initial normal stress at CNL boundary conditions. A comparison of predicted value with experimental results indicated most of the prediction lies in the prediction bend of 95%.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.21.00060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently use of commercial software for analysis and design of rock slopes, underground structures, mining projects, the foundation of any infrastructure projects, piles, etc. becoming more popular and widely used. But sometimes, this software has many limitations and cannot be used directly for finding out the strength and deformation behavior of rock joints when joints are subjected to external load because of the construction of different projects. Correct prediction of strength and deformation behavior of rock joints are important for safe, economical, and sustainable design. In the present work, strength and deformation behavior of unfilled and infilled rock joints have been studied numerically by using one of the commercial software Universal Distinct Element Code (UDEC) under different boundary conditions like constant normal stiffness (CNS) and constant normal load (CNL) boundary conditions. The numerical model results are compared with experimental results of the test performed on a physical model. The strength predicted by the numerical model is in close agreement with experimental results at low initial normal stress and for CNL boundary conditions, as the asperity degradation during shearing process is almost same throughout the test. The numerical model cannot correctly predict the shear strength of rock joints under CNS boundary conditions and at high normal stress for both CNL and CNS conditions, because of the degradation in the asperity during shearing process and available model dosenot consider this effect. Hence, UDEC code has been modified in the present study for its acceptability under both CNL and CNS boundary conditins and at high initial normal stress at CNL boundary conditions. A comparison of predicted value with experimental results indicated most of the prediction lies in the prediction bend of 95%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同边界条件下充填岩体节理的剪切特性
近年来,利用商业软件对岩质边坡、地下结构、矿山工程、任何基础设施工程的基础、桩基等进行分析和设计越来越受欢迎和广泛应用。但有时由于不同工程的施工,该软件存在许多局限性,不能直接用于计算岩石节理在外力作用下的强度和变形行为。正确预测岩石节理的强度和变形特性对设计的安全性、经济性和可持续性具有重要意义。本文采用通用离散元代码(UDEC)软件,对不同边界条件下,如恒法向刚度(CNS)和恒法向荷载(CNL)边界条件下,未充填和充填岩石节理的强度和变形特性进行了数值研究。数值模型结果与物理模型试验结果进行了比较。在低初始法向应力和CNL边界条件下,数值模型预测的强度与试验结果吻合较好,因为在整个试验过程中,剪切过程中的粗糙度退化几乎相同。由于剪切过程中粗糙度的退化,现有的模型没有考虑到这一影响,所以无论是CNL还是CNS条件下,数值模型都不能正确预测CNS边界条件下和高法向应力条件下岩石节理的抗剪强度。因此,在本研究中对UDEC规范进行了修改,以使其在CNL和CNS边界条件下以及在CNL边界条件下的高初始法向应力下均可接受。预测值与实验结果的比较表明,大部分预测都在95%的预测弯曲范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1