Reflecting on the use of freedom of information requests in mental health research

Q3 Social Sciences Social Work and Social Sciences Review Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1921/swssr.v23i3.1985
P. Archard, J. Tangen, E. Giles, Steven Lucas, Isobel Moore, M. O’Reilly, D. Murphy
{"title":"Reflecting on the use of freedom of information requests in mental health research","authors":"P. Archard, J. Tangen, E. Giles, Steven Lucas, Isobel Moore, M. O’Reilly, D. Murphy","doi":"10.1921/swssr.v23i3.1985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freedom of information (FoI) legislation has been represented as a valuable but underused means of generating otherwise unavailable data from public authorities in health and social care research. This article complements extant literature on the use of FoI requests for research intended to inform health and social care policy and improve the quality of practice. Reflections are provided on challenges and ethical considerations, drawing on relevant literature and the authors’ experience undertaking studies addressing different topics in mental health and child welfare using FoI requests as the primary source of data collection. The recommendations are practically orientated and aimed primarily at social work and health and social care researchers who may have limited knowledge of how FoI requests might be utilised in their work but be curious about this method’s application.","PeriodicalId":53681,"journal":{"name":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v23i3.1985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Freedom of information (FoI) legislation has been represented as a valuable but underused means of generating otherwise unavailable data from public authorities in health and social care research. This article complements extant literature on the use of FoI requests for research intended to inform health and social care policy and improve the quality of practice. Reflections are provided on challenges and ethical considerations, drawing on relevant literature and the authors’ experience undertaking studies addressing different topics in mental health and child welfare using FoI requests as the primary source of data collection. The recommendations are practically orientated and aimed primarily at social work and health and social care researchers who may have limited knowledge of how FoI requests might be utilised in their work but be curious about this method’s application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对在心理健康研究中使用信息自由要求的反思
信息自由立法一直被认为是一种宝贵但未得到充分利用的手段,可以从卫生和社会保健研究方面的公共当局获得否则无法获得的数据。这篇文章补充了关于利用信息自由请求进行研究的现有文献,这些研究旨在为卫生和社会保健政策提供信息并提高实践质量。根据相关文献和作者利用信息自由请求作为数据收集的主要来源,就心理健康和儿童福利的不同主题进行研究的经验,对挑战和伦理考虑进行了反思。这些建议以实际为导向,主要针对社会工作以及卫生和社会护理研究人员,这些研究人员可能对如何在其工作中利用信息自由请求了解有限,但对这种方法的应用感到好奇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Work and Social Sciences Review
Social Work and Social Sciences Review Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Web-based mindfulness course for staff working in care homes in Wales for older people with dementia social inclusion of mental health service users in Brazil: Applying SCOPE-B scale Quality of life as a basis for system change Editorial: Celebrating the work of Peter Huxley Historical applications of the Goldberg and Huxley Pathway to Psychiatric Care Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1