María Cerrillo , Gustavo N. Cecchino , María Cruz , Mercedes Mayoral , Alberto Pacheco , Juan A. García-Velasco Prof.
{"title":"Impact of administration route on serum progesterone levels in women undergoing artificial endometrial preparation","authors":"María Cerrillo , Gustavo N. Cecchino , María Cruz , Mercedes Mayoral , Alberto Pacheco , Juan A. García-Velasco Prof.","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2022.100124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Are there differences in serum progesterone levels between different routes of exogenous progesterone administration for artificial endometrial preparation?</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This prospective, observational, single-centre study included 9 infertile female patients who underwent cycles of artificial endometrial preparation between January and June 2019 with different progesterone formulations (3 cycles in 2 patients; 2 cycles in 2 patients; and 1 cycle in 5 patients). Oestrogen stimulation was followed by vaginal progesterone 400 mg every 12 h (first cycle), subcutaneous progesterone 25 mg every 12 h (second cycle), and intramuscular progesterone 50 mg every 24 h (third cycle). Progesterone therapy was continued for 5 days and daily serum progesterone was recorded. The primary outcome was day 5 serum progesterone.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Day 5 mean ± standard deviation serum progesterone levels after vaginal, subcutaneous, and intramuscular administration were 14.6 ± 5.5, 47.9 ± 22.3, and 60.3 ± 65.5 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.032 across routes). From day 1 to day 5, the coefficients of variation for serum progesterone were 66% and 75% with the vaginal and subcutaneous routes, respectively, indicating low variability, and 146% with the </span>intramuscular route<span>, indicating high variability. Two linear regression<span> models were conducted: a normal linear regression model, which found no significant effect of administration route on serum progesterone, and a mixed-effects linear regression model, which also showed no statistically significant differences between routes.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All routes of progesterone administration showed satisfactory day 5 mean serum progesterone levels, regardless of administration route.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932022000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
Are there differences in serum progesterone levels between different routes of exogenous progesterone administration for artificial endometrial preparation?
Material and methods
This prospective, observational, single-centre study included 9 infertile female patients who underwent cycles of artificial endometrial preparation between January and June 2019 with different progesterone formulations (3 cycles in 2 patients; 2 cycles in 2 patients; and 1 cycle in 5 patients). Oestrogen stimulation was followed by vaginal progesterone 400 mg every 12 h (first cycle), subcutaneous progesterone 25 mg every 12 h (second cycle), and intramuscular progesterone 50 mg every 24 h (third cycle). Progesterone therapy was continued for 5 days and daily serum progesterone was recorded. The primary outcome was day 5 serum progesterone.
Results
Day 5 mean ± standard deviation serum progesterone levels after vaginal, subcutaneous, and intramuscular administration were 14.6 ± 5.5, 47.9 ± 22.3, and 60.3 ± 65.5 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.032 across routes). From day 1 to day 5, the coefficients of variation for serum progesterone were 66% and 75% with the vaginal and subcutaneous routes, respectively, indicating low variability, and 146% with the intramuscular route, indicating high variability. Two linear regression models were conducted: a normal linear regression model, which found no significant effect of administration route on serum progesterone, and a mixed-effects linear regression model, which also showed no statistically significant differences between routes.
Conclusion
All routes of progesterone administration showed satisfactory day 5 mean serum progesterone levels, regardless of administration route.