Irrational prescribing: myths and facts

N. Saravanabavan, R. S. Codi, K. Manimekalai
{"title":"Irrational prescribing: myths and facts","authors":"N. Saravanabavan, R. S. Codi, K. Manimekalai","doi":"10.18203/2319-2003.IJBCP20211664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New medical undergraduates should be well trained regarding rational prescribing, proper diagnosis and adequate dosing, frequency etc in their course as per MCI Pharmacology curriculum. So when they start their own clinic, he/she prescribes only an antihistamine for the patient with common cold for two days at bed time and asks the patient to come after two days but on other side the mind-set of the patient will be such that there exists a pill for every illness which makes them to think that particular doctor has not prescribed more drugs which may be due to lack of knowledge and so immediately the patient will go to another doctor who will prescribe at least 3 drugs one antihistamine, one antibiotic and analgesic for the common cold because of which the mind-set of people gets corrupted. Thus, the undue pressure by the patients on the health care providers/practioners to prescribe a greater number of drugs is one of the most troublesome factors which contributes for irrational use of medicines. Macfarlane et al had also proved that in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections the inclusion of antibiotic in the prescription was around 74%, of which patient pressure was the main reason in more than half.","PeriodicalId":13898,"journal":{"name":"International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology","volume":"160 1","pages":"612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.IJBCP20211664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New medical undergraduates should be well trained regarding rational prescribing, proper diagnosis and adequate dosing, frequency etc in their course as per MCI Pharmacology curriculum. So when they start their own clinic, he/she prescribes only an antihistamine for the patient with common cold for two days at bed time and asks the patient to come after two days but on other side the mind-set of the patient will be such that there exists a pill for every illness which makes them to think that particular doctor has not prescribed more drugs which may be due to lack of knowledge and so immediately the patient will go to another doctor who will prescribe at least 3 drugs one antihistamine, one antibiotic and analgesic for the common cold because of which the mind-set of people gets corrupted. Thus, the undue pressure by the patients on the health care providers/practioners to prescribe a greater number of drugs is one of the most troublesome factors which contributes for irrational use of medicines. Macfarlane et al had also proved that in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections the inclusion of antibiotic in the prescription was around 74%, of which patient pressure was the main reason in more than half.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非理性处方:神话和事实
根据MCI药理学课程要求,对医学本科新生进行合理处方、正确诊断、适当剂量、频次等方面的培训。所以当他们开办自己的诊所时,他/她规定只是一个普通感冒患者的抗组胺剂两天在床上时候,问病人两天之后但在另一边病人的心态是,存在一个药片每疾病使他们认为特定的医生并没有规定更多的药物,可能是由于缺乏知识,所以立即病人要去另一个医生会开出至少3药物抗组胺剂,一种普通感冒的抗生素和镇痛剂因为人们的思维模式被破坏了。因此,病人对卫生保健提供者/医生施加不适当的压力,要求他们开出更多的药物,这是造成不合理用药的最麻烦的因素之一。Macfarlane等人也证明,在治疗急性下呼吸道感染时,处方中包含抗生素的比例约为74%,其中超过一半的患者压力是主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of KaraShieldTM properties in supporting the immune health of healthy subjects: a randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study Knowledge attitude and practices of drug promotional literature: a clinician’s perspective Evaluation of β-blockers dosage regimen rationality in heart failure patients Perceptions of undergraduate medical students of old traditional and new CBME curriculum about pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reactions reporting at a tertiary care teaching hospital: a comparative study Comparison of efficacy of azilsartan with olmesartan in patients of hypertension: randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1