Postoperative Thrombocytopenia and Coagulopathy in Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Incidence and Outcomes after Non-Red Cell Blood Product Transfusion

{"title":"Postoperative Thrombocytopenia and Coagulopathy in Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Incidence and Outcomes after Non-Red Cell Blood Product Transfusion","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.07.13862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) activates inflammatory and fibrinolytic pathways, potentially disrupting hemostasis. Transfusion of non-red cell blood product is a conventional method of restoring hemostasis and treating coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia, the two common adverse outcomes of CPB.\n\nObjective: To determine the incidence and outcomes of postoperative thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy in adult Thai cardiac surgery patients with CPB receiving non-red cell blood product transfusions.\n\nMaterials and Methods: The present study included patients aged 18 years and older that underwent cardiac surgery with CPB at Siriraj Hospital between January 2017 and June 2018. Enrolled patients were divided into four groups, no non-red cell blood products in Group 1, platelets (PLT) only in Group 2, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and/or cryoprecipitate (cryo) in Group 3, and PLT, FFP and/or cryo in Group 4. Patients, clinical status and histories, intraoperative outcomes, and perioperative outcomes were collected and assessed for all groups. Postoperative thrombocytopenia was defined by PLT counts less than 100,000 cells/mm³. Coagulopathy was defined by prothrombin time (PT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) greater than 1.5 of its institutional reference values. Non-red cell blood product transfusions for cardiac patients were determined by their attending physician.\n\nResults: Of the 360 patients included, 61.7% were male, with a mean (±SD) age of 65.3±11.7 years, and BMI of 24.1±4.0 kg/m². Most patients were classified as ASA-PS class 3 (71.9%), had elective surgeries (96.4%), history of antiplatelet use (65.8%), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgical procedure (56.9%). Postoperative thrombocytopenia was significantly more prevalent in Group 1 at 11.6%, followed by Group 3 at 9.5%, Group 4 at 3.7%, and Group 2 at 0% (p=0.010). Post-operative coagulopathy was more prevalent in Group 3 at 4.8%, followed by Group 2 at 4.1%, Group 1 at 3.9%, and Group 4 at 0.7%. Group 4 had a significantly greater incidence of anticoagulant use at 17.8% (p=0.007) and significantly longer CPB durations compared to the other groups at 146.6±74.7 minutes (p<0.01).\n\nConclusion: The researchers’ study confirmed that preoperative antithrombotic use prior to cardiac surgical procedures and longer CPB duration influences physicians’ decision to transfuse. The present study recommended prohibiting prophylactic administration of FFP and PLT as well as implementing restrictive non-red cell blood product transfusion strategies.\n\nKeywords: Thrombocytopenia; Coagulopathy; Non-red Cell Blood Product Transfusion; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Cardiac Surgery","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.07.13862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) activates inflammatory and fibrinolytic pathways, potentially disrupting hemostasis. Transfusion of non-red cell blood product is a conventional method of restoring hemostasis and treating coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia, the two common adverse outcomes of CPB. Objective: To determine the incidence and outcomes of postoperative thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy in adult Thai cardiac surgery patients with CPB receiving non-red cell blood product transfusions. Materials and Methods: The present study included patients aged 18 years and older that underwent cardiac surgery with CPB at Siriraj Hospital between January 2017 and June 2018. Enrolled patients were divided into four groups, no non-red cell blood products in Group 1, platelets (PLT) only in Group 2, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and/or cryoprecipitate (cryo) in Group 3, and PLT, FFP and/or cryo in Group 4. Patients, clinical status and histories, intraoperative outcomes, and perioperative outcomes were collected and assessed for all groups. Postoperative thrombocytopenia was defined by PLT counts less than 100,000 cells/mm³. Coagulopathy was defined by prothrombin time (PT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) greater than 1.5 of its institutional reference values. Non-red cell blood product transfusions for cardiac patients were determined by their attending physician. Results: Of the 360 patients included, 61.7% were male, with a mean (±SD) age of 65.3±11.7 years, and BMI of 24.1±4.0 kg/m². Most patients were classified as ASA-PS class 3 (71.9%), had elective surgeries (96.4%), history of antiplatelet use (65.8%), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgical procedure (56.9%). Postoperative thrombocytopenia was significantly more prevalent in Group 1 at 11.6%, followed by Group 3 at 9.5%, Group 4 at 3.7%, and Group 2 at 0% (p=0.010). Post-operative coagulopathy was more prevalent in Group 3 at 4.8%, followed by Group 2 at 4.1%, Group 1 at 3.9%, and Group 4 at 0.7%. Group 4 had a significantly greater incidence of anticoagulant use at 17.8% (p=0.007) and significantly longer CPB durations compared to the other groups at 146.6±74.7 minutes (p<0.01). Conclusion: The researchers’ study confirmed that preoperative antithrombotic use prior to cardiac surgical procedures and longer CPB duration influences physicians’ decision to transfuse. The present study recommended prohibiting prophylactic administration of FFP and PLT as well as implementing restrictive non-red cell blood product transfusion strategies. Keywords: Thrombocytopenia; Coagulopathy; Non-red Cell Blood Product Transfusion; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Cardiac Surgery
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏手术合并体外循环术后血小板减少和凝血功能障碍:非红细胞血液制品输血后的发病率和结果
背景:体外循环(CPB)激活炎症和纤溶途径,潜在地破坏止血。输血非红细胞血液制品是恢复止血和治疗凝血功能障碍和血小板减少症的常规方法,这是CPB的两种常见不良后果。目的:了解泰国成年心脏手术CPB患者接受非红细胞血制品输血后血小板减少和凝血功能障碍的发生率和结局。材料与方法:本研究纳入了2017年1月至2018年6月期间在Siriraj医院接受CPB心脏手术的18岁及以上患者。入组患者分为四组,第一组无非红细胞血制品,第二组仅含血小板(PLT),第三组为新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)和/或冷冻沉淀(cryo),第四组为PLT、FFP和/或冷冻。收集并评估所有组的患者、临床状况和病史、术中结局和围术期结局。术后血小板减少的定义是血小板计数小于100,000细胞/mm³。凝血功能障碍的定义是凝血酶原时间(PT)或活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)大于其机构参考值的1.5倍。心脏病患者的非红细胞血液制品输注由其主治医师决定。结果:360例患者中,男性占61.7%,平均(±SD)年龄为65.3±11.7岁,BMI为24.1±4.0 kg/m²。大多数患者被分类为ASA-PS 3级(71.9%),有择期手术(96.4%),有抗血小板使用史(65.8%),有冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术(56.9%)。术后血小板减少发生率在第1组为11.6%,第3组为9.5%,第4组为3.7%,第2组为0% (p=0.010)。术后凝血功能障碍在第3组更为普遍,为4.8%,其次是第2组4.1%,第1组3.9%,第4组0.7%。第4组抗凝剂使用率为17.8% (p=0.007), CPB持续时间为146.6±74.7 min,明显高于其他组(p<0.01)。结论:研究人员的研究证实,心脏外科手术前的术前抗血栓治疗和较长的CPB持续时间影响医生是否输血的决定。本研究建议禁止预防性使用FFP和PLT,并实施限制性非红细胞制品输血策略。关键词:血小板减少症;凝血障碍;非红细胞输血;心肺旁路;心脏手术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) and Conventional Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study Efficacy of Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin in Neonatal Seizure in Rural Area of Thailand Spontaneous Sternal Fracture in Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1