The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study
{"title":"The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.08.13875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The preferred choice of anesthesia for cesarean delivery is spinal block, which has a failure rate of 0.5% to 17.0%. The present study investigated the incident rate of second choice of anesthesia following a failed block, as well as the factors influencing the anesthesiologist’s selection.\n\nMaterials and Methods: A single-center, retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using electronic medical records of parturients who had experienced a failed spinal block for cesarean deliveries between 2014 and 2019. Each rate of repeated spinal block and the conversion to general anesthesia were calculated. Factors associated with the decision-making were examined, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were reviewed.\n\nResults: Three hundred four women were recruited. The rates of repeated block and conversion to general anesthesia were 81.2% and 18.8%, respectively. Dural puncture with more than one attempt (p=0.022) and anesthesia level at the thoracic dermatome (p<0.001) were associated with a lower decision to repeat the block. Maternal in the repeated block group had a higher incidence of hypotension at 59.5% (p<0.001) and shivering at 16.2% (p=0.008). Neonates in the repeat block group had a lower incidence of any complications than those in the conversion to general anesthesia group at 4% versus 29.8% (p<0.001).\n\nConclusion: Following an unsuccessful spinal block for cesarean section, the repeated block was still preferred. The level of anesthesia and the spinal attempts were the significant factors in this choice.\n\nKeywords: Cesarean delivery; Conversion to general anesthesia; Failed spinal block; Maternal and neonatal outcomes; Repeat block","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.08.13875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The preferred choice of anesthesia for cesarean delivery is spinal block, which has a failure rate of 0.5% to 17.0%. The present study investigated the incident rate of second choice of anesthesia following a failed block, as well as the factors influencing the anesthesiologist’s selection.
Materials and Methods: A single-center, retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using electronic medical records of parturients who had experienced a failed spinal block for cesarean deliveries between 2014 and 2019. Each rate of repeated spinal block and the conversion to general anesthesia were calculated. Factors associated with the decision-making were examined, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were reviewed.
Results: Three hundred four women were recruited. The rates of repeated block and conversion to general anesthesia were 81.2% and 18.8%, respectively. Dural puncture with more than one attempt (p=0.022) and anesthesia level at the thoracic dermatome (p<0.001) were associated with a lower decision to repeat the block. Maternal in the repeated block group had a higher incidence of hypotension at 59.5% (p<0.001) and shivering at 16.2% (p=0.008). Neonates in the repeat block group had a lower incidence of any complications than those in the conversion to general anesthesia group at 4% versus 29.8% (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Following an unsuccessful spinal block for cesarean section, the repeated block was still preferred. The level of anesthesia and the spinal attempts were the significant factors in this choice.
Keywords: Cesarean delivery; Conversion to general anesthesia; Failed spinal block; Maternal and neonatal outcomes; Repeat block