Improving accessibility to cultural heritage for people with Intellectual Disabilities: A tool for observing the obstacles and facilitators for the access to knowledge

Marilina Mastrogiuseppe , Stefania Span , Elena Bortolotti
{"title":"Improving accessibility to cultural heritage for people with Intellectual Disabilities: A tool for observing the obstacles and facilitators for the access to knowledge","authors":"Marilina Mastrogiuseppe ,&nbsp;Stefania Span ,&nbsp;Elena Bortolotti","doi":"10.1016/j.alter.2020.06.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Convention on the rights of people with disabilities (UN, 2006) stated that participation in social life is a fundamental human right emphasizing the importance to rethink the concept of accessibility in cultural spaces. Cultural heritage sites, as well as museums and galleries, express an increasing interest in adopting strategies to improve accessibility and participation for all. We used an Inclusive Research paradigm, actively involving a group of individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) with the goal to investigate participants’ perceptions and ideas of obstacles/facilitators to knowledge accessibility. A particular focus has been given to readability and comprehensibility of the existing textual resources in a cultural heritage site. The inclusion of people with ID as informants during the entire research process allowed not only to assess their point of view, but also to realize a questionnaire using the easy-to-read criteria. The main variables assessed through the questionnaire are: (a) Perception and Physical Interaction with content resources, (b) Language and symbols, (c) Content comprehension, (d) Engagement with knowledge. We argue that the proposed questionnaire may be useful to inform the process of creating and transforming learning environments adopting an audience-centered dialogue. Enhancing the contribution of special pedagogy in this innovative research field means improving our understanding of people's needs and the complexity of potential outcomes, from an inclusive perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45156,"journal":{"name":"Alter-European Journal of Disability Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.alter.2020.06.016","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alter-European Journal of Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875067220300651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The Convention on the rights of people with disabilities (UN, 2006) stated that participation in social life is a fundamental human right emphasizing the importance to rethink the concept of accessibility in cultural spaces. Cultural heritage sites, as well as museums and galleries, express an increasing interest in adopting strategies to improve accessibility and participation for all. We used an Inclusive Research paradigm, actively involving a group of individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) with the goal to investigate participants’ perceptions and ideas of obstacles/facilitators to knowledge accessibility. A particular focus has been given to readability and comprehensibility of the existing textual resources in a cultural heritage site. The inclusion of people with ID as informants during the entire research process allowed not only to assess their point of view, but also to realize a questionnaire using the easy-to-read criteria. The main variables assessed through the questionnaire are: (a) Perception and Physical Interaction with content resources, (b) Language and symbols, (c) Content comprehension, (d) Engagement with knowledge. We argue that the proposed questionnaire may be useful to inform the process of creating and transforming learning environments adopting an audience-centered dialogue. Enhancing the contribution of special pedagogy in this innovative research field means improving our understanding of people's needs and the complexity of potential outcomes, from an inclusive perspective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善智障人士获取文化遗产的机会:一种观察知识获取障碍和促进因素的工具
《残疾人权利公约》(联合国,2006年)指出,参与社会生活是一项基本人权,强调了重新思考文化空间中无障碍概念的重要性。文化遗产地以及博物馆和画廊表示越来越有兴趣采取战略,改善所有人的可及性和参与。我们采用了包容性研究范式,积极参与一组智障人士(ID),目的是调查参与者对知识可及性障碍/促进者的看法和想法。特别关注的是文化遗产地现有文本资源的可读性和可理解性。在整个研究过程中纳入有身份证的人作为线人,不仅可以评估他们的观点,还可以使用易于阅读的标准来实现问卷调查。通过问卷评估的主要变量是:(a)与内容资源的感知和物理交互,(b)语言和符号,(c)内容理解,(d)对知识的参与。我们认为,提出的问卷可能有助于通过以受众为中心的对话来创建和改变学习环境。加强特殊教育学在这一创新研究领域的贡献意味着从包容性的角度提高我们对人们需求和潜在结果复杂性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ALTER is a peer-reviewed European journal which looks at disability and its variations. It is aimed at everyone who is involved or interested in this field. ALTER is an emblematic Latin word for all forms of difference, leaving open the question of their nature and expression. An inter-disciplinary journal First and foremost, interdisciplinarity means remaining open to all human and social sciences: sociology, anthropology, psychology, psychoanalysis, history, demography, epidemiology, economics, law, etc. It also means a connection between the different forms of knowledge - academic and fundamental - applied and relating to the experience of disability.
期刊最新文献
Work expectations of adults with developmental disabilities Emploi et handicap : le vécu des personnes en situation de handicap Où sont les freins à l’emploi ? Inactivité et chômage parmi les personnes avec une déficience de survenue précoce The employment policy and vocational activity support system for people with intellectual disabilities in Poland (In)capacité au travail ? Organisation et fonctionnement des ateliers pour personnes en situation de handicap en Allemagne
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1