Agent-based model experiments cast doubt on Dunnell’s adaptive waste explanation for cultural elaboration

W. Carleton, B. McCauley, A. Costopoulos, M. Collard
{"title":"Agent-based model experiments cast doubt on Dunnell’s adaptive waste explanation for cultural elaboration","authors":"W. Carleton, B. McCauley, A. Costopoulos, M. Collard","doi":"10.1080/20548923.2019.1647648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ancient monuments are puzzling from an evolutionary perspective. It is obvious that their construction would have been costly in terms of energy, but it is not clear how they would have enhanced reproductive success. In the late 1980s, Robert Dunnell proposed a solution to this conundrum. He argued that wasting energy on monuments and other forms of what he called “cultural elaboration” was adaptive in highly variable environments. Here, we report a study in which we used an agent-based model to test Dunnell’s hypothesis. We found that the propensity to waste was subject to strong negative selection regardless of the level of environmental variability. At the start of the simulation runs, agents wasted ca. 50% of the time but selection rapidly drove that rate down, ultimately settling at ca. 5–7%. This casts doubt on the ability of Dunnell’s hypothesis to explain instances of cultural elaboration in the archaeological record.","PeriodicalId":21858,"journal":{"name":"STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20548923.2019.1647648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ancient monuments are puzzling from an evolutionary perspective. It is obvious that their construction would have been costly in terms of energy, but it is not clear how they would have enhanced reproductive success. In the late 1980s, Robert Dunnell proposed a solution to this conundrum. He argued that wasting energy on monuments and other forms of what he called “cultural elaboration” was adaptive in highly variable environments. Here, we report a study in which we used an agent-based model to test Dunnell’s hypothesis. We found that the propensity to waste was subject to strong negative selection regardless of the level of environmental variability. At the start of the simulation runs, agents wasted ca. 50% of the time but selection rapidly drove that rate down, ultimately settling at ca. 5–7%. This casts doubt on the ability of Dunnell’s hypothesis to explain instances of cultural elaboration in the archaeological record.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于主体的模型实验对Dunnell关于文化阐述的适应性浪费解释提出了质疑
从进化的角度来看,古代纪念碑令人费解。很明显,就能源而言,它们的建造将是昂贵的,但它们如何提高繁殖成功率尚不清楚。20世纪80年代末,罗伯特·邓奈尔(Robert Dunnell)提出了一个解决这个难题的方法。他认为,把精力浪费在纪念碑和其他形式的他所谓的“文化精致”上,在高度多变的环境中是适应性的。在这里,我们报告了一项研究,我们使用基于主体的模型来检验Dunnell的假设。我们发现,无论环境可变性水平如何,浪费倾向都受到强烈的负选择的影响。在模拟运行开始时,代理浪费了大约50%的时间,但选择迅速降低了这一比率,最终稳定在大约5-7%。这就使人们对邓奈尔的假说能否解释考古记录中文化精细化的实例产生了怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An early Byzantine ecclesiastical complex at Ashdod-Yam: correlating geophysical prospection with excavated remains Color analysis and classification of earthenware from Phra Mahathat Woramahawihan temple in southern Thailand using machine learning GPR Mapping of buried monumental retaining walls at biblical Kiriath-Yearim near Jerusalem Landscapes of the “Coast of Death”: dolmen topographies of NW Iberia Advancing and refining archaeological dental calculus research using multiomic frameworks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1