Influence of liquid pollination technique on fruit yield and physicochemical characteristics of date palm cultivars Khadrawy and Zahidi

M. Munir
{"title":"Influence of liquid pollination technique on fruit yield and physicochemical characteristics of date palm cultivars Khadrawy and Zahidi","authors":"M. Munir","doi":"10.37855/jah.2020.v22i01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Present study was designed to evaluate the response of date palm cultivars Khadrawy and Zahidi to varied concentrations of pollen grains liquid suspension (1, 2, 3 and 4 g L-1). The experiment was arranged in two-factorial randomized complete block design. Results of the study revealed that the pollen application of 4 g L-1 significantly increased fruit set (86 %), fruit weight (11.27 g), fruit length (38.27 mm), fruit width (23.70 mm), fruit thickness (18.90 mm), fruit geometric diameter (24.93 mm), fruit arithmetic diameter (26.96 mm), fruit surface area (1953.93 mm2), fruit volume (11.29 cc), yield per palm (23.97 kg), seed length (2.40 cm), pulp weight (9.83 g), pulp:seed ratio (6.88) and moisture content (22.72 %). However, fruit drop parameter was minimal (37 %) in that treatment as compared to others. All other parameters (fruit sphericity, seed weight, seed diameter, percent of pulp, percent of seed, total soluble solids, total sugars, reducing sugars and non-reducing sugars) were statistically not different. However, application of 3 g L-1 pollen grains liquid suspension treatment was closely followed by 4 g L-1 pollen grain application regarding all these attributes. Comparison between the date palm cultivars, Khadrawy was observed superior than Zahidi regarding aforesaid parameters. The interaction of both factors showed positive impact of 4 g L-1 pollen suspension concentration when applied to cultivar Khadrawy, which was closely followed by 3 g L-1 application. It is therefore, concluded from the present research that although the application of 4 g L-1 pollen suspension treatment gave the best results in both cultivars, application of 3 g L-1 pollen suspension can also be practiced at a minimal compromise on date palm yield and quality for both cultivars.","PeriodicalId":15010,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Horticulture Lucknow","volume":"35 1","pages":"12-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Horticulture Lucknow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2020.v22i01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Present study was designed to evaluate the response of date palm cultivars Khadrawy and Zahidi to varied concentrations of pollen grains liquid suspension (1, 2, 3 and 4 g L-1). The experiment was arranged in two-factorial randomized complete block design. Results of the study revealed that the pollen application of 4 g L-1 significantly increased fruit set (86 %), fruit weight (11.27 g), fruit length (38.27 mm), fruit width (23.70 mm), fruit thickness (18.90 mm), fruit geometric diameter (24.93 mm), fruit arithmetic diameter (26.96 mm), fruit surface area (1953.93 mm2), fruit volume (11.29 cc), yield per palm (23.97 kg), seed length (2.40 cm), pulp weight (9.83 g), pulp:seed ratio (6.88) and moisture content (22.72 %). However, fruit drop parameter was minimal (37 %) in that treatment as compared to others. All other parameters (fruit sphericity, seed weight, seed diameter, percent of pulp, percent of seed, total soluble solids, total sugars, reducing sugars and non-reducing sugars) were statistically not different. However, application of 3 g L-1 pollen grains liquid suspension treatment was closely followed by 4 g L-1 pollen grain application regarding all these attributes. Comparison between the date palm cultivars, Khadrawy was observed superior than Zahidi regarding aforesaid parameters. The interaction of both factors showed positive impact of 4 g L-1 pollen suspension concentration when applied to cultivar Khadrawy, which was closely followed by 3 g L-1 application. It is therefore, concluded from the present research that although the application of 4 g L-1 pollen suspension treatment gave the best results in both cultivars, application of 3 g L-1 pollen suspension can also be practiced at a minimal compromise on date palm yield and quality for both cultivars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液体授粉技术对枣椰树产量和理化特性的影响
本研究旨在评价枣椰树品种Khadrawy和Zahidi对不同浓度(1、2、3和4 g L-1)花粉粒悬浮液的反应。试验采用二因子随机完全区组设计。研究结果显示,4 g l - 1显著增加水果的花粉应用组(86%)、水果重量(11.27 g),果实长度(38.27毫米),水果宽度(23.70毫米),水果厚度(18.90毫米),水果几何直径(24.93毫米),水果算术直径(26.96毫米),水果表面面积(1953.93平方毫米),果实体积(11.29 cc),收益率/棕榈(23.97公斤),种子长度(2.40厘米),纸浆体重(9.83 g),纸浆:种子比例(6.88)和水分含量(22.72%)。然而,与其他处理相比,该处理的果实掉落参数最小(37%)。所有其他参数(果实球形度、种子重量、种子直径、果肉百分比、种子百分比、总可溶性固形物、总糖、还原糖和非还原糖)均无统计学差异。但是,施用3g L-1花粉粒液体悬浮液处理后,施用4g L-1花粉粒处理对所有性状的影响紧随其后。在枣椰树品种间的比较中,Khadrawy在上述参数上优于Zahidi。两因素的交互作用表明,4 g L-1的花粉悬浮液浓度对Khadrawy有正向影响,其次是3 g L-1的花粉悬浮液浓度。因此,本研究得出结论,尽管在两个品种中施用4 g L-1花粉悬浮液处理效果最好,但施用3 g L-1花粉悬浮液也可以在对两个品种的枣椰树产量和品质影响最小的情况下进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of adsorbent-arak ratio and distillation period in bioethanol purification process using Balinese liquor as a raw material Breeding for fusarium wilt resistance and some economic characters in cucumber Determination of key parameters for grading dehusked coconut using principal component analysis Nutrient dynamics and assessment of nitrogen-fixing bacteria during vermicomposting of leaf litter of neem (Azadirachta indica) using two epigeic earthworms Effect of levels of NPK on growth and yield of Isabgol (Plantago ovata Forsk)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1