Governing the conduct of computing: computer science, the social sciences and framework of computing

Richard Hull
{"title":"Governing the conduct of computing: computer science, the social sciences and framework of computing","authors":"Richard Hull","doi":"10.1016/S0959-8022(97)00007-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social science concepts and techniques have been bound up with computing since its earliest days. This relationship is described in terms of three distinct “frameworks of computing”, historically specific ways of understanding, working with and developing computer systems. Each framework has different understanding of the “real” and desirable relations between people and computers, and a concern that hardware and software shouldre flect these relations. They render some forms of computing thinkable and desirable, whilst ruling out others—to a considerable extent they govern the conduct of computing, in both basic R &amp; D and in commercial and organizational development. The frameworks are not purely internal to the historical development of computing, but nor are they the direct effect of any single external factor. They also overlap with each other in different configurations within computing, and two such sites are described in more detail: human-computer interaction and computer-supported cooperative work. In conclusion, firstly some suggestions are offered for further research, in particular the possibility that new frameworks are being assembled as computing converges with the media industries; and secondly the form of analysis is presented as being complementary to many existing aproaches, through occupying a middle ground between traditional scientific and historical methodologies, and the emergent focus on contextuallity, difference and deconstruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100011,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Management and Information Technologies","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 213-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0959-8022(97)00007-6","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Management and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959802297000076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Social science concepts and techniques have been bound up with computing since its earliest days. This relationship is described in terms of three distinct “frameworks of computing”, historically specific ways of understanding, working with and developing computer systems. Each framework has different understanding of the “real” and desirable relations between people and computers, and a concern that hardware and software shouldre flect these relations. They render some forms of computing thinkable and desirable, whilst ruling out others—to a considerable extent they govern the conduct of computing, in both basic R & D and in commercial and organizational development. The frameworks are not purely internal to the historical development of computing, but nor are they the direct effect of any single external factor. They also overlap with each other in different configurations within computing, and two such sites are described in more detail: human-computer interaction and computer-supported cooperative work. In conclusion, firstly some suggestions are offered for further research, in particular the possibility that new frameworks are being assembled as computing converges with the media industries; and secondly the form of analysis is presented as being complementary to many existing aproaches, through occupying a middle ground between traditional scientific and historical methodologies, and the emergent focus on contextuallity, difference and deconstruction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理计算行为:计算机科学,社会科学和计算框架
社会科学的概念和技术从一开始就与计算机联系在一起。这种关系是用三种不同的“计算框架”来描述的,它们是历史上特定的理解、使用和开发计算机系统的方式。每个框架对人与计算机之间“真实的”和理想的关系有不同的理解,并且关心硬件和软件应该反映这些关系。它们使某些形式的计算变得可以想象和理想,同时排除了其他形式的计算——在相当大的程度上,它们支配着计算的行为,无论是在基本的研究和开发;D .在商业和组织发展方面。这些框架并不纯粹是计算历史发展的内部因素,但它们也不是任何单一外部因素的直接影响。它们还在计算中的不同配置中相互重叠,并且更详细地描述了两个这样的站点:人机交互和计算机支持的协作工作。最后,本文首先提出了一些可供进一步研究的建议,特别是随着计算与媒体产业的融合,新的框架正在形成的可能性;其次,通过占据传统科学和历史方法论之间的中间地带,以及新兴的对语境、差异和解构的关注,这种分析形式被呈现为对许多现有方法的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design Understanding organizational learning by focusing on “activity systems” Index Temporal effects of information systems on business processes: focusing on the dimensions of temporality Place, space and knowledge work: a study of outsourced computer systems administrators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1