Medical Students' Knowledge About Children With Disabilities, Special Education Laws, and Social Services: A Preliminary Scale Development and Pilot Study

Nancy Vitalone-Raccaro, M. Sheppard, Jacqueline M Kaari
{"title":"Medical Students' Knowledge About Children With Disabilities, Special Education Laws, and Social Services: A Preliminary Scale Development and Pilot Study","authors":"Nancy Vitalone-Raccaro, M. Sheppard, Jacqueline M Kaari","doi":"10.7556/jaoa.2019.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Context In order to design undergraduate medical education responsive to the American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendation that physicians learn about special education law and practices, it is important to understand medical students’ baseline knowledge about children with disabilities, special education law, available services, and the sources of this information. Objectives To develop an instrument to measure what second-year medical students know about children with disabilities, special education law, and available services; to determine the most common sources of this information; and to establish a baseline on which to design curricula that address this topic. Methods This study adopted a survey design. The survey took place in 1 school of osteopathic medicine in a Northeastern state of the United States. One hundred fifty medical students in their second year of full-time enrollment were invited to complete the survey. The instrument designed by the authors consisted of 30 items organized into a demographics section and 3 domains: (1) perceived level of knowledge about children with disabilities, (2) sources of information about children with disabilities, and (3) actual knowledge about children with disabilities and special education. Results Ninety-eight students (65%) participated. Although students were accurate in self-assessment, their source of knowledge was limited. Medical students who identified personal experiences (t=1.64) and coursework as their source of knowledge had more correct responses (t=2.62). Conclusion This preliminary study demonstrated a lack of knowledge among second-year medical students with regard to children with disabilities, special education laws, and social services. Curricula emphasizing disabilities and special education along with longitudinal experiential training may be effective methods to deliver these topics.","PeriodicalId":16639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"52 1","pages":"674 - 681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2019.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Context In order to design undergraduate medical education responsive to the American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendation that physicians learn about special education law and practices, it is important to understand medical students’ baseline knowledge about children with disabilities, special education law, available services, and the sources of this information. Objectives To develop an instrument to measure what second-year medical students know about children with disabilities, special education law, and available services; to determine the most common sources of this information; and to establish a baseline on which to design curricula that address this topic. Methods This study adopted a survey design. The survey took place in 1 school of osteopathic medicine in a Northeastern state of the United States. One hundred fifty medical students in their second year of full-time enrollment were invited to complete the survey. The instrument designed by the authors consisted of 30 items organized into a demographics section and 3 domains: (1) perceived level of knowledge about children with disabilities, (2) sources of information about children with disabilities, and (3) actual knowledge about children with disabilities and special education. Results Ninety-eight students (65%) participated. Although students were accurate in self-assessment, their source of knowledge was limited. Medical students who identified personal experiences (t=1.64) and coursework as their source of knowledge had more correct responses (t=2.62). Conclusion This preliminary study demonstrated a lack of knowledge among second-year medical students with regard to children with disabilities, special education laws, and social services. Curricula emphasizing disabilities and special education along with longitudinal experiential training may be effective methods to deliver these topics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生对残疾儿童、特殊教育法与社会服务的认知:初步规模发展与初步研究
摘要背景为了设计符合美国儿科学会(American Academy of Pediatrics)建议医生学习特殊教育法和实践的本科医学教育,了解医学生对残疾儿童、特殊教育法、可用服务以及这些信息的来源的基本知识是很重要的。目的开发一种测量二年级医学生对残疾儿童、特殊教育法和可用服务的了解程度的工具;确定该信息的最常见来源;并建立一个基线,在此基础上设计解决这个问题的课程。方法采用问卷调查法。这项调查在美国东北部一个州的一所骨科医学院进行。150名全日制医学院第二年的学生被邀请完成这项调查。由作者设计的工具包括30个项目,分为人口统计部分和3个领域:(1)对残疾儿童的认知水平,(2)关于残疾儿童的信息来源,(3)关于残疾儿童和特殊教育的实际知识。结果98名学生参加,占65%。虽然学生的自我评价准确,但他们的知识来源有限。将个人经历(t=1.64)和课程作业作为其知识来源的医学生答对率更高(t=2.62)。结论本初步研究显示医二学生对残疾儿童、特殊教育法和社会服务的知识缺乏。强调残疾和特殊教育的课程以及纵向经验培训可能是传授这些主题的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous neonatal subcutaneous emphysema: analysis of neonatal management Further insight on AOA ophthalmology residency program closure data Cranial osteopathic techniques and electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power: a controlled crossover trial Response to “Further insight on AOA ophthalmology residency program closure data” UGRC 2021 recommendations on GME transition: pros and cons, opportunities and limitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1