Can We Fill in the Gaps? Authoring Custom Oncology Pathways vs Surfacing NCCN Preferred Recommendations Alone

R. Maniago, Marcello Ricottone, G. Calip, Taylor Dias-Foundas, James R. Hamrick
{"title":"Can We Fill in the Gaps? Authoring Custom Oncology Pathways vs Surfacing NCCN Preferred Recommendations Alone","authors":"R. Maniago, Marcello Ricottone, G. Calip, Taylor Dias-Foundas, James R. Hamrick","doi":"10.25270/jcp.2023.05.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of clinical decision support (CDS) tools may help to optimize the delivery of value-based cancer care and reduce variations in treatment. Flat­iron Assist (FA) is an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded CDS tool that is locally customizable and designed to aid medical oncologists in selecting and documenting National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guideline–con­cordant, NCCN Preferred, and/or customized treatment regimens. The study aimed to compare the availability of NCCN Preferred recommendations to cus­tom preferred pathways in FA, and to assess provider concordance with the pre­ferred suggestions. This retrospective, observational, real-world study analyzed 16,722 orders for breast, non-small cell lung, and colon cancers over 11 months, placed at 12 US-based sites of care by 522 clinicians in hospital and community-based cancer clinics. Of the 13,140 orders placed at sites where NCCN Preferred was available, an NCCN Preferred option existed for 7,680 orders, resulting in 58.5% relative coverage for the clinical scenarios in scope. Of the 3,261 orders placed where a custom preferred pathway was available, a custom preferred op­tion existed for 2,320 orders, resulting in 71.1% relative coverage for the clinical scenarios in scope (rate ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.25; P < .001 fa­voring custom preferred pathways). When a preferred option was available, pro­viders’ selection rates were similar. The study highlights the opportunity for cus­tom preferred pathways to guide oncologists and provide clearer guidance in cases where NCCN Preferred is not available. FA’s design, with the ability to pro­vide a local preference, and the option to highlight treatment regimens based on efficacy, safety, and affordability, makes it a valuable tool for oncologists to navigate the complex treatment landscape. The study emphasizes the need for accessible and accurate information to ensure high-quality cancer care delivery.","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2023.05.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of clinical decision support (CDS) tools may help to optimize the delivery of value-based cancer care and reduce variations in treatment. Flat­iron Assist (FA) is an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded CDS tool that is locally customizable and designed to aid medical oncologists in selecting and documenting National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guideline–con­cordant, NCCN Preferred, and/or customized treatment regimens. The study aimed to compare the availability of NCCN Preferred recommendations to cus­tom preferred pathways in FA, and to assess provider concordance with the pre­ferred suggestions. This retrospective, observational, real-world study analyzed 16,722 orders for breast, non-small cell lung, and colon cancers over 11 months, placed at 12 US-based sites of care by 522 clinicians in hospital and community-based cancer clinics. Of the 13,140 orders placed at sites where NCCN Preferred was available, an NCCN Preferred option existed for 7,680 orders, resulting in 58.5% relative coverage for the clinical scenarios in scope. Of the 3,261 orders placed where a custom preferred pathway was available, a custom preferred op­tion existed for 2,320 orders, resulting in 71.1% relative coverage for the clinical scenarios in scope (rate ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.25; P < .001 fa­voring custom preferred pathways). When a preferred option was available, pro­viders’ selection rates were similar. The study highlights the opportunity for cus­tom preferred pathways to guide oncologists and provide clearer guidance in cases where NCCN Preferred is not available. FA’s design, with the ability to pro­vide a local preference, and the option to highlight treatment regimens based on efficacy, safety, and affordability, makes it a valuable tool for oncologists to navigate the complex treatment landscape. The study emphasizes the need for accessible and accurate information to ensure high-quality cancer care delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们能填补空白吗?编写自定义肿瘤途径vs单独提出NCCN首选建议
临床决策支持(CDS)工具的使用可能有助于优化基于价值的癌症护理的提供,并减少治疗的变化。Flat-iron Assist (FA)是一种嵌入电子健康记录(EHR)的CDS工具,可在当地定制,旨在帮助医学肿瘤学家选择和记录国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南一致、NCCN首选和/或定制的治疗方案。本研究旨在比较NCCN优选建议与FA患者自定义优选途径的可用性,并评估提供者与优选建议的一致性。这项回顾性、观察性、真实世界的研究分析了11个月内美国12个医院和社区癌症诊所的522名临床医生对乳腺癌、非小细胞肺癌和结肠癌的16,722份医嘱。在提供NCCN首选方案的站点下的13,140份订单中,有7,680份订单中存在NCCN首选方案,因此在范围内临床方案的相对覆盖率为58.5%。在提供自定义首选途径的3261个订单中,有2320个订单存在自定义首选选项,导致范围内临床场景的相对覆盖率为71.1%(比率比1.22,95%置信区间1.19-1.25;P < 0.001支持自定义首选途径)。当有首选方案时,供应商的选择率相似。该研究强调了自定义首选途径指导肿瘤学家的机会,并在无法获得NCCN首选途径的情况下提供更清晰的指导。FA的设计能够提供本地偏好,并根据疗效、安全性和可负担性突出治疗方案,使其成为肿瘤学家在复杂的治疗前景中导航的宝贵工具。该研究强调了获取准确信息的必要性,以确保提供高质量的癌症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: The Wins, The Challenges, and How We Can Deliver on Personalized Cancer Care Off-Label Use of Precision Oncology Therapeutics in Advanced Solid Cancers Following Identification of Associated Variants via Multicancer Next-Generation Sequencing Panel: A Real-World Evidence Pilot Study NGS Testing in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Leveraging Quality Measurement to Drive Equitable Cancer Care for Transgender Individuals https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/jcp/feature-story/oncology-pathways-drive-adoption-high-quality-treatment-regimens-and-deliver
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1