Exploring LoRa for Sensing

IF 0.7 Q4 TELECOMMUNICATIONS GetMobile-Mobile Computing & Communications Review Pub Date : 2021-09-14 DOI:10.1145/3486880.3486890
Fusang Zhang, Zhaoxin Chang, Jie Xiong, Daqing Zhang
{"title":"Exploring LoRa for Sensing","authors":"Fusang Zhang, Zhaoxin Chang, Jie Xiong, Daqing Zhang","doi":"10.1145/3486880.3486890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless sensing received a great amount of attention in recent years and various wireless technologies have been exploited for sensing, including WiFi [1], RFID [2], ultrasound [3], 60 GHz mmWave [4] and visible light [5]. The key advantage of wireless sensing over traditional sensing is that the target does not need to be equipped with any sensor(s) and the wireless signal itself is being used for sensing. Exciting new applications have been enabled, such as passive localization [6] and contactless human activity sensing [7]. While promising in many aspects, one key limitation of current wireless sensing techniques is the very small sensing range. This is because while both direct path and reflection path signals are used for communication, only the weak target-reflection signals can be used for sensing. Take Wi-Fi as an example: the communication range can reach 20 to 50 meters indoors but its sensing range is merely 4 to 8 meters. This small range further limits the through-wall sensing capability of Wi-Fi. On the other hand, many applications do require long-range and through-wall sensing capability. In a fire rescue scenario, the sensing device cannot be placed close to the building, and the long-range through-wall sensing capabilities are critical for detecting people deep inside the building. Table I summarizes the sensing range of existing wireless technologies. We can see that long-range through-wall sensing is still missing with wireless sensing.","PeriodicalId":29918,"journal":{"name":"GetMobile-Mobile Computing & Communications Review","volume":"292 1","pages":"33 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GetMobile-Mobile Computing & Communications Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3486880.3486890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TELECOMMUNICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Wireless sensing received a great amount of attention in recent years and various wireless technologies have been exploited for sensing, including WiFi [1], RFID [2], ultrasound [3], 60 GHz mmWave [4] and visible light [5]. The key advantage of wireless sensing over traditional sensing is that the target does not need to be equipped with any sensor(s) and the wireless signal itself is being used for sensing. Exciting new applications have been enabled, such as passive localization [6] and contactless human activity sensing [7]. While promising in many aspects, one key limitation of current wireless sensing techniques is the very small sensing range. This is because while both direct path and reflection path signals are used for communication, only the weak target-reflection signals can be used for sensing. Take Wi-Fi as an example: the communication range can reach 20 to 50 meters indoors but its sensing range is merely 4 to 8 meters. This small range further limits the through-wall sensing capability of Wi-Fi. On the other hand, many applications do require long-range and through-wall sensing capability. In a fire rescue scenario, the sensing device cannot be placed close to the building, and the long-range through-wall sensing capabilities are critical for detecting people deep inside the building. Table I summarizes the sensing range of existing wireless technologies. We can see that long-range through-wall sensing is still missing with wireless sensing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索LoRa传感
近年来,无线传感受到了极大的关注,各种无线技术被用于传感,包括WiFi[1]、RFID[2]、超声波[3]、60 GHz毫米波[4]和可见光[5]。与传统传感相比,无线传感的主要优点是目标不需要配备任何传感器,无线信号本身被用于传感。令人兴奋的新应用已经启用,如被动定位[6]和非接触式人体活动传感[7]。虽然目前无线传感技术在许多方面都很有前景,但一个关键的限制是传感范围很小。这是因为虽然直接路径和反射路径信号都用于通信,但只有弱目标反射信号才能用于传感。以Wi-Fi为例,室内通信距离可达20 - 50米,但其传感距离仅为4 - 8米。这个小范围进一步限制了Wi-Fi的穿墙感应能力。另一方面,许多应用确实需要远程和穿壁传感能力。在火灾救援场景中,传感装置不能放置在靠近建筑物的地方,远程穿墙传感能力对于探测建筑物深处的人员至关重要。表1总结了现有无线技术的传感范围。我们可以看到,无线传感仍然缺少远程穿壁传感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Acoustic Localization of Drones in Precise Landing: The Research and Practice with MicNest An Overview of 3GPP Standardization for Extended Reality (XR) in 5G and Beyond Community-Driven Mobile and Ubiquitous Computing A New Design Paradigm for Polymorphic Backscatter Radios Leakyscatter: Scaling Wireless Backscatter Above 100 GHz
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1