Y. Rudyk, O. Nazarovets, I. Golovatchuk, N. Beznos
{"title":"VALIDATION OF RISK INDICATORS IN ASSESSING THE SAFETY OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT BOILER HOUSE IN THUNDERSTORM","authors":"Y. Rudyk, O. Nazarovets, I. Golovatchuk, N. Beznos","doi":"10.32447/20786662.38.2021.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Today requires the introduction and arrangement of modern enterprises automation of the technological process using various electronic and electrical equipment. The breakdown of one sensor leads to a stoppage of the technical process and thousands of losses. This equipment is sensitive to impulse overvoltages that occur for various reasons, as well as when hit by lightning. There is a misconception that the danger of lightning arises only when struck directly, forgetting about the socalled secondary phenomena, namely electromagnetic and electrostatic pulses. Pulse overvoltage is a short-term increase in voltage above the allowable value. Lightning protection systems are designed and designed to protect objects from dangerous lightning.Purpose. Given the automation of the process and the saturation of boilers with electronic and electrical equipment, there is a high risk of lightning and high potentials, which can lead to large-scale accidents. The purpose of this article is to validate the risk indicators for the boiler environment that occur during a thunderstorm.Methods. The use of various methods of calculation, assessment and ordering of risks during the design and layout of the system allows to implementation system lightning protection of buildings, equipment and people. General principles of risk assessment for the boiler environment must take into account: risk and determine the need for protection; the contribution of various risk components to the overall risk; the effect of various protection measures to reduce risk; selection of protection measures taking into account their economic efficiency.Results. Neglecting the high risk of a dangerous event leads to excessive damage and m irreparable losses, with which a person or community will not be able to achieve sustainable development. Therefore, it is a comprehensive, systematic approach to achieving safety, starting from the assessment stage, should take into account both the characteristics of the hazard, including a fire in the relevant facilities, and personal, the individual risk of death or injury. Lightning is an unpredictable natural event, no one in the world fully understands the mechanism of lightning and it is impossible to provide 100% protection under any circumstances under any standardization. For this purpose, the following calculations are given: loss of human life, including injuries; loss of the ability to provide public services; losses of cultural heritage and economic value of the building (structure) and economic losses required for the installation and operation of the system. Based on the obtained data, it is seen how the reduction of each risk is achieved depending on the proposed solution and the economic effect in general.Conclusion. Statistics on deaths and injuries from lightning hazards, losses from damage to property, buildings and struc-tures confirm that in risk assessment, which is standardized in DSTU EN 62305-2, it is necessary to introduce a methodology that would meet the conditions of Ukraine. The arrangement of the lightning protection system depends on the risk assessment, the reaction of the owner, the influence of control bodies. Therefore, it is important to decide on fire protection measures in lightning risk assessment procedures, but it can also be taken regardless of the results of the risk assessment where there is a desire to avoid unacceptable risk. Equipment that is often associated with two different services, e.g. power lines and data lines suffer a lot of surge damage. This case is not covered by the RX risk component. However, appropriate protection measures can be selected and established (see IEC 62305-4).","PeriodicalId":12280,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32447/20786662.38.2021.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction. Today requires the introduction and arrangement of modern enterprises automation of the technological process using various electronic and electrical equipment. The breakdown of one sensor leads to a stoppage of the technical process and thousands of losses. This equipment is sensitive to impulse overvoltages that occur for various reasons, as well as when hit by lightning. There is a misconception that the danger of lightning arises only when struck directly, forgetting about the socalled secondary phenomena, namely electromagnetic and electrostatic pulses. Pulse overvoltage is a short-term increase in voltage above the allowable value. Lightning protection systems are designed and designed to protect objects from dangerous lightning.Purpose. Given the automation of the process and the saturation of boilers with electronic and electrical equipment, there is a high risk of lightning and high potentials, which can lead to large-scale accidents. The purpose of this article is to validate the risk indicators for the boiler environment that occur during a thunderstorm.Methods. The use of various methods of calculation, assessment and ordering of risks during the design and layout of the system allows to implementation system lightning protection of buildings, equipment and people. General principles of risk assessment for the boiler environment must take into account: risk and determine the need for protection; the contribution of various risk components to the overall risk; the effect of various protection measures to reduce risk; selection of protection measures taking into account their economic efficiency.Results. Neglecting the high risk of a dangerous event leads to excessive damage and m irreparable losses, with which a person or community will not be able to achieve sustainable development. Therefore, it is a comprehensive, systematic approach to achieving safety, starting from the assessment stage, should take into account both the characteristics of the hazard, including a fire in the relevant facilities, and personal, the individual risk of death or injury. Lightning is an unpredictable natural event, no one in the world fully understands the mechanism of lightning and it is impossible to provide 100% protection under any circumstances under any standardization. For this purpose, the following calculations are given: loss of human life, including injuries; loss of the ability to provide public services; losses of cultural heritage and economic value of the building (structure) and economic losses required for the installation and operation of the system. Based on the obtained data, it is seen how the reduction of each risk is achieved depending on the proposed solution and the economic effect in general.Conclusion. Statistics on deaths and injuries from lightning hazards, losses from damage to property, buildings and struc-tures confirm that in risk assessment, which is standardized in DSTU EN 62305-2, it is necessary to introduce a methodology that would meet the conditions of Ukraine. The arrangement of the lightning protection system depends on the risk assessment, the reaction of the owner, the influence of control bodies. Therefore, it is important to decide on fire protection measures in lightning risk assessment procedures, but it can also be taken regardless of the results of the risk assessment where there is a desire to avoid unacceptable risk. Equipment that is often associated with two different services, e.g. power lines and data lines suffer a lot of surge damage. This case is not covered by the RX risk component. However, appropriate protection measures can be selected and established (see IEC 62305-4).
介绍。今天要求现代企业引进和安排自动化的工艺流程,使用各种电子电气设备。一个传感器的故障会导致技术过程的停止和成千上万的损失。该设备对各种原因引起的脉冲过电压以及雷击很敏感。人们有一种误解,认为闪电的危险只有在被直接击中时才会出现,而忘记了所谓的二次现象,即电磁脉冲和静电脉冲。脉冲过电压是指电压在短时间内升高到允许值以上。防雷系统的设计和设计是为了保护物体免受危险的雷击。考虑到过程的自动化和锅炉中电子和电气设备的饱和,存在雷击和高电位的高风险,这可能导致大规模事故。本文的目的是验证雷暴期间锅炉环境的风险指标。在系统的设计和布置过程中,采用各种方法对风险进行计算、评估和排序,实现对建筑物、设备和人员的系统防雷。对锅炉环境进行风险评估的一般原则必须考虑到:风险和确定保护的需要;各种风险成分对整体风险的贡献;各种保护措施降低风险的效果;保护措施的选择应考虑其经济效益。结果。忽视危险事件的高风险会导致过度损害和无法弥补的损失,从而使个人或社区无法实现可持续发展。因此,它是实现安全的一种全面、系统的方法,从评估阶段开始,既要考虑到危险的特征,包括有关设施的火灾,也要考虑到个人的死亡或受伤风险。闪电是一种不可预测的自然事件,世界上没有人完全了解闪电的机制,在任何标准下都不可能在任何情况下提供100%的防护。为此目的,计算如下:人命损失,包括受伤人数;丧失提供公共服务的能力;建筑(结构)的文化遗产和经济价值损失以及系统安装和运行所需的经济损失。根据所获得的数据,可以看到如何根据提出的解决方案和总体经济效果来降低每种风险。关于雷电灾害造成的伤亡、财产、建筑物和结构损坏造成的损失的统计数据证实,在DSTU EN 62305-2标准化的风险评估中,有必要采用一种符合乌克兰条件的方法。防雷系统的布置取决于风险评估、业主的反应、控制机构的影响。因此,在雷电风险评估程序中确定防火措施是很重要的,但如果希望避免不可接受的风险,也可以不考虑风险评估结果而采取措施。通常与两种不同的服务相关联的设备,例如电力线和数据线会遭受大量的电涌损坏。这种情况不包括在RX风险组件中。但是,可以选择和建立适当的保护措施(见IEC 62305-4)。