AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ JAPONYA STRATEJİK ORTAKLIK ANLAŞMASININ RASYONEL VE NORMATİF TEMELLERİ

Selin Türkeş Kiliç
{"title":"AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ JAPONYA STRATEJİK ORTAKLIK ANLAŞMASININ RASYONEL VE NORMATİF TEMELLERİ","authors":"Selin Türkeş Kiliç","doi":"10.32450/AACD.886933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the rational and normative dimensions of the Strategic Partnership Agreement signed between the European Union (EU) and Japan in 2018. The parties characterize their bilateral relations by emphasizing the adherence to shared principles and values; and their interests. This study explores how the interests and norms are reflected in political practice by analyzing their weight in the agreement. The method applied is content analysis via a theory-driven coding approach. The codes are defined under the categories of interest and norm derived from neoliberal institutionalism and social constructivism approaches within international cooperation literature. The analysis reveals that the EU-Japan strategic partnership's rational basis is stronger and that bilateral relations and common interests have priority over shared values.","PeriodicalId":40233,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Avrupa Calismalari Dergisi-Ankara Review of European Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ankara Avrupa Calismalari Dergisi-Ankara Review of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32450/AACD.886933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes the rational and normative dimensions of the Strategic Partnership Agreement signed between the European Union (EU) and Japan in 2018. The parties characterize their bilateral relations by emphasizing the adherence to shared principles and values; and their interests. This study explores how the interests and norms are reflected in political practice by analyzing their weight in the agreement. The method applied is content analysis via a theory-driven coding approach. The codes are defined under the categories of interest and norm derived from neoliberal institutionalism and social constructivism approaches within international cooperation literature. The analysis reveals that the EU-Japan strategic partnership's rational basis is stronger and that bilateral relations and common interests have priority over shared values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究分析了2018年欧盟与日本签署的战略伙伴关系协议的合理性和规范性维度。双方强调遵守共同的原则和价值观,这是其双边关系的特点;还有他们的兴趣。本研究通过分析利益与规范在协议中的权重,探讨其在政治实践中的体现。应用的方法是通过理论驱动的编码方法进行内容分析。这些准则是根据国际合作文献中的新自由主义制度主义和社会建构主义方法衍生的利益和规范类别来定义的。分析表明,欧日战略伙伴关系的理性基础更强,双边关系和共同利益优先于共同价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ HUKUKUNDA ÖZGÜRLÜK VE GÜVENLİK HAKKI ÇERÇEVESİNDE AVRUPA TUTUKLAMA MÜZEKKERESİ VE SIĞINMACILARIN İDARİ GÖZETİMİ TEDBİRLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ BACK TO THE ORIGINS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION - TURKEY RELATIONS: ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INSTITUTIONALIZED PATHWAY AND ITS SHORTCOMINGS AVRUPA YEŞİL MUTABAKATI’NA UYUM ÇERÇEVESİNDE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ İŞLETMELERİN EMİSYON TİCARETİNE VERDİKLERİ DESTEĞİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER BREXİT KARARINI MEŞRULAŞTIRMA ARACI OLARAK TÜRKİYE’NİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ ÜYELİĞİ: AYRILMA YANLISI AKTÖRLERİN SÖYLEMLERİNİN ANALİZİ Avrupa Birliği Medya Okuryazarlığı Politika ve Mevzuatına Yönelik Bir Değerlendirme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1