MRI in pre-operative NAC vascular map

C. Francisco, S. João, B. Rita, M. Carlos, Leal de Faria Joao Abecasis Nuno
{"title":"MRI in pre-operative NAC vascular map","authors":"C. Francisco, S. João, B. Rita, M. Carlos, Leal de Faria Joao Abecasis Nuno","doi":"10.14303/IMAGING-MEDICINE.1000086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: NAC’s blood supply may convey essential information for surgery planning. This study’s aim was to evaluate breast blood supply using MRI and to compare it between oncological and non-oncological subjects. The risk factors for NAC necrosis in nipple sparing mastectomy were analyzed. Methods: Breast MRI exams in one month at a single institution were evaluated. The considered inclusion criteria focused on patients with: ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive carcinoma (IC) or high-risk screening (HRS) without previous breast surgery. Subtraction reconstructions from dynamic acquisitions obtained at 60 s post-contrast administration were used. Results: 166 breasts were evaluated (12 pre op DCIS; 42 HRS; 112 pre op IC) - 71% of the NAC’s had a dominant blood supply. Tumors were localized in the upper outer quadrant (UOQ) in 46% of cases. In the NAC vascularization analysis, there was a tendency for a higher number of vessels vascularizing the NAC in the IC group (p=0.056) and there was a difference in the quadrant analysis mainly at the UOQ that had a dominant blood supply in 18% of the IC group and only 2% in the HRS (p=0.048). 16 patients performed NSM, three had NAC necrosis. The number of vessels supplying the NAC was the only factor with correlation with this outcome (p=0.01). There was not a single NAC with a dominant blood vessel from the lower outer quadrant (LOQ). Conclusion: Using MRI to pre-operatively evaluate breast blood supply is feasible without adding extra MRI time or contrast. 71% had dominant supply to the NAC, so every effort should be made to preserve it. The LOQ appears to be an optimal site for skin incisions. There is an asymmetry between cancer and HRS breasts mainly at the NAC’s level with neovascularization of that area. Patients with a single vessel supplying the NAC are at improved risk for necrosis.","PeriodicalId":13333,"journal":{"name":"Imaging in Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"215-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14303/IMAGING-MEDICINE.1000086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: NAC’s blood supply may convey essential information for surgery planning. This study’s aim was to evaluate breast blood supply using MRI and to compare it between oncological and non-oncological subjects. The risk factors for NAC necrosis in nipple sparing mastectomy were analyzed. Methods: Breast MRI exams in one month at a single institution were evaluated. The considered inclusion criteria focused on patients with: ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive carcinoma (IC) or high-risk screening (HRS) without previous breast surgery. Subtraction reconstructions from dynamic acquisitions obtained at 60 s post-contrast administration were used. Results: 166 breasts were evaluated (12 pre op DCIS; 42 HRS; 112 pre op IC) - 71% of the NAC’s had a dominant blood supply. Tumors were localized in the upper outer quadrant (UOQ) in 46% of cases. In the NAC vascularization analysis, there was a tendency for a higher number of vessels vascularizing the NAC in the IC group (p=0.056) and there was a difference in the quadrant analysis mainly at the UOQ that had a dominant blood supply in 18% of the IC group and only 2% in the HRS (p=0.048). 16 patients performed NSM, three had NAC necrosis. The number of vessels supplying the NAC was the only factor with correlation with this outcome (p=0.01). There was not a single NAC with a dominant blood vessel from the lower outer quadrant (LOQ). Conclusion: Using MRI to pre-operatively evaluate breast blood supply is feasible without adding extra MRI time or contrast. 71% had dominant supply to the NAC, so every effort should be made to preserve it. The LOQ appears to be an optimal site for skin incisions. There is an asymmetry between cancer and HRS breasts mainly at the NAC’s level with neovascularization of that area. Patients with a single vessel supplying the NAC are at improved risk for necrosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前NAC血管图MRI
目的:NAC血供可为手术规划提供重要信息。本研究的目的是利用核磁共振成像评估乳腺血液供应,并比较肿瘤和非肿瘤受试者的情况。分析保留乳头乳房切除术中NAC坏死的危险因素。方法:对一个月内在同一家机构进行的乳腺MRI检查进行评估。考虑的纳入标准集中于:导管原位癌、浸润性癌(IC)或高危筛查(HRS)患者,既往未做过乳房手术。使用对比后60秒动态采集的减法重建。结果:166个乳房被评估(12个术前DCIS;42小时;112术前IC) - 71%的NAC有优势的血液供应。46%的病例肿瘤局限于上外象限(UOQ)。在NAC血管化分析中,IC组NAC血管化的数量有增加的趋势(p=0.056),在象限分析中,差异主要在UOQ, IC组有18%的主导血液供应,而HRS只有2% (p=0.048)。NSM 16例,NAC坏死3例。NAC供血血管数量是与该结果相关的唯一因素(p=0.01)。没有一个NAC的优势血管来自下外象限(LOQ)。结论:术前应用MRI评估乳腺血供是可行的,无需增加MRI时间和造影剂。71%的公司对NAC的供应占主导地位,因此应尽一切努力保持这种供应。LOQ似乎是皮肤切口的最佳部位。癌症和HRS乳房之间的不对称主要发生在NAC水平,该区域新生血管形成。只有一条血管供应NAC的患者发生坏死的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma: Clinical features and dermoscopic appearances Cardiac Metastasis In A Patient With Poorly-differentiated Neuroendorcrine Tumor: 18F-FDG PET-CT Finding Carcinoma of tongue in xeroderma pigmentosum a medical image Saffron Extract Prevents Vancomycin-induced Nephrotoxicity Genital Self-mutilation In Schizophreni
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1