The Right to Privacy, Its Progress & Decline: A Critical Review

A. Khan, Rizwana Gul, Shaista Naznin
{"title":"The Right to Privacy, Its Progress & Decline: A Critical Review","authors":"A. Khan, Rizwana Gul, Shaista Naznin","doi":"10.26710/jbsee.v8i2.2255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This article is aimed to analyze the different Philosophical and legal perspectives of privacy in the United States with reference to a few landmark cases in the U.S. My debate will cover different situations, views, and laws in the US, the EU, and Pakistan (to some extent) to critically view present and ongoing violations (now mostly agreed with opinion) of the right to privacy.  W. A. Parents and others on the definition of privacy and Louis D Brandeis on a political and legal ideal of privacy have been talked about. \nApproach: prior research studies and existing literature was examined regarding privacy. \nFindings: Privacy is acknowledged as a human rights issue, but it constitutes a real problem when the values and objectives behind privacy are different. Contemporary issues of unlimited surveillance and data collection to battle terrorism by law enforcement agencies and governments are particularly alarming to invade the right.","PeriodicalId":53047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v8i2.2255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This article is aimed to analyze the different Philosophical and legal perspectives of privacy in the United States with reference to a few landmark cases in the U.S. My debate will cover different situations, views, and laws in the US, the EU, and Pakistan (to some extent) to critically view present and ongoing violations (now mostly agreed with opinion) of the right to privacy.  W. A. Parents and others on the definition of privacy and Louis D Brandeis on a political and legal ideal of privacy have been talked about. Approach: prior research studies and existing literature was examined regarding privacy. Findings: Privacy is acknowledged as a human rights issue, but it constitutes a real problem when the values and objectives behind privacy are different. Contemporary issues of unlimited surveillance and data collection to battle terrorism by law enforcement agencies and governments are particularly alarming to invade the right.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐私权,它的进步与衰落:一个批判性的回顾
目的:本文旨在通过参考美国一些具有里程碑意义的案例来分析美国不同的隐私哲学和法律观点。我的辩论将涵盖美国、欧盟和巴基斯坦(在某种程度上)的不同情况、观点和法律,以批判性地看待当前和正在进行的侵犯隐私权的行为(现在大多数人同意意见)。W. a . Parents等人对隐私的定义和Louis D . Brandeis关于隐私的政治和法律理想的讨论。方法:对先前的研究和现有文献进行了研究。研究发现:隐私是一个公认的人权问题,但当隐私背后的价值和目标不同时,它就构成了一个真正的问题。执法机构和政府为打击恐怖主义而无限制地进行监控和收集数据,这些当代问题尤其令人担忧,因为它们侵犯了人权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Influence of National Culture on Trust Development, Empirical Evidence and Managerial Implications Circular economy and Opportunities for Small and Medium Enterprises in Lather Industry of Sialkot Pakistan Oliver’s Four Stage Loyalty Model to Access the Impact of Umrah Services: Evidence from Umrah Travelling Agencies Operating in Pakistan Antecedents and Precedents of On-Job Bullying: A Qualitative Approach Impact of Social Media Influencers to promote Healthy Lifestyle behaviour: A Review from the Self-Determination Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1