{"title":"The Right to Privacy, Its Progress & Decline: A Critical Review","authors":"A. Khan, Rizwana Gul, Shaista Naznin","doi":"10.26710/jbsee.v8i2.2255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This article is aimed to analyze the different Philosophical and legal perspectives of privacy in the United States with reference to a few landmark cases in the U.S. My debate will cover different situations, views, and laws in the US, the EU, and Pakistan (to some extent) to critically view present and ongoing violations (now mostly agreed with opinion) of the right to privacy. W. A. Parents and others on the definition of privacy and Louis D Brandeis on a political and legal ideal of privacy have been talked about. \nApproach: prior research studies and existing literature was examined regarding privacy. \nFindings: Privacy is acknowledged as a human rights issue, but it constitutes a real problem when the values and objectives behind privacy are different. Contemporary issues of unlimited surveillance and data collection to battle terrorism by law enforcement agencies and governments are particularly alarming to invade the right.","PeriodicalId":53047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v8i2.2255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This article is aimed to analyze the different Philosophical and legal perspectives of privacy in the United States with reference to a few landmark cases in the U.S. My debate will cover different situations, views, and laws in the US, the EU, and Pakistan (to some extent) to critically view present and ongoing violations (now mostly agreed with opinion) of the right to privacy. W. A. Parents and others on the definition of privacy and Louis D Brandeis on a political and legal ideal of privacy have been talked about.
Approach: prior research studies and existing literature was examined regarding privacy.
Findings: Privacy is acknowledged as a human rights issue, but it constitutes a real problem when the values and objectives behind privacy are different. Contemporary issues of unlimited surveillance and data collection to battle terrorism by law enforcement agencies and governments are particularly alarming to invade the right.
目的:本文旨在通过参考美国一些具有里程碑意义的案例来分析美国不同的隐私哲学和法律观点。我的辩论将涵盖美国、欧盟和巴基斯坦(在某种程度上)的不同情况、观点和法律,以批判性地看待当前和正在进行的侵犯隐私权的行为(现在大多数人同意意见)。W. a . Parents等人对隐私的定义和Louis D . Brandeis关于隐私的政治和法律理想的讨论。方法:对先前的研究和现有文献进行了研究。研究发现:隐私是一个公认的人权问题,但当隐私背后的价值和目标不同时,它就构成了一个真正的问题。执法机构和政府为打击恐怖主义而无限制地进行监控和收集数据,这些当代问题尤其令人担忧,因为它们侵犯了人权。