La percepción de los pacientes de reproducción asistida sobre la tecnología de testigo electrónico: resultados de una encuesta

Lorena Montero , Miguel Gallardo , María Lastra, Ana Braula-Reis, Ana Paula Soares, Fernando Sánchez-Martín
{"title":"La percepción de los pacientes de reproducción asistida sobre la tecnología de testigo electrónico: resultados de una encuesta","authors":"Lorena Montero ,&nbsp;Miguel Gallardo ,&nbsp;María Lastra,&nbsp;Ana Braula-Reis,&nbsp;Ana Paula Soares,&nbsp;Fernando Sánchez-Martín","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2017.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The addition of electronic witnessing technologies as a quality control element in the human assisted reproduction treatments can increase their safety, by reducing the risk of mistakes. However, the impact of the inclusion of these elements in the patients’ perceived safety and quality is still unknown, as well as whether it translates into an improved experience when undergoing an in vitro fertilization treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A survey was conducted on 200 patients, attending a private assisted reproduction unit located in Lisbon, Portugal, between January and July 2016. Participants were asked to give a numerical value to 6 sentences, depending on their level of agreement with them, in order to reflect their perception about the safety and quality of the assisted reproduction techniques, and the electronic witnessing technology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Despite the high confidence level on the quality and safety of assisted reproduction treatments procedures, they consider that undergoing an in vitro fertilization treatment produces anxiety. Consequently, patients value positively the addition of an electronic witnessing element, and consider it increases their overall confidence in in vitro fertilization procedures. This trend is increasingly marked in ‘novel’ patients, who have had no previous exposure to assisted reproduction treatments, when compared with experienced patients that have undergone one or more treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Patients show a strong interest in electronic witnessing technologies. It is, thus, important to produce evidence, in our geographical context, addressing their cost and effect upon the quality of assisted reproduction treatments procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medre.2017.09.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932017300300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The addition of electronic witnessing technologies as a quality control element in the human assisted reproduction treatments can increase their safety, by reducing the risk of mistakes. However, the impact of the inclusion of these elements in the patients’ perceived safety and quality is still unknown, as well as whether it translates into an improved experience when undergoing an in vitro fertilization treatment.

Material and methods

A survey was conducted on 200 patients, attending a private assisted reproduction unit located in Lisbon, Portugal, between January and July 2016. Participants were asked to give a numerical value to 6 sentences, depending on their level of agreement with them, in order to reflect their perception about the safety and quality of the assisted reproduction techniques, and the electronic witnessing technology.

Results

Despite the high confidence level on the quality and safety of assisted reproduction treatments procedures, they consider that undergoing an in vitro fertilization treatment produces anxiety. Consequently, patients value positively the addition of an electronic witnessing element, and consider it increases their overall confidence in in vitro fertilization procedures. This trend is increasingly marked in ‘novel’ patients, who have had no previous exposure to assisted reproduction treatments, when compared with experienced patients that have undergone one or more treatments.

Discussion

Patients show a strong interest in electronic witnessing technologies. It is, thus, important to produce evidence, in our geographical context, addressing their cost and effect upon the quality of assisted reproduction treatments procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助生殖患者对电子见证技术的认知:一项调查结果
在人类辅助生殖治疗中增加电子见证技术作为质量控制元素可以通过减少错误的风险来提高其安全性。然而,纳入这些因素对患者感知的安全性和质量的影响仍然未知,以及它是否转化为接受体外受精治疗时的改善体验。材料与方法对2016年1月至7月在葡萄牙里斯本一家私人辅助生殖机构就诊的200名患者进行了调查。参与者被要求根据他们的同意程度为6个句子给出一个数值,以反映他们对辅助生殖技术和电子见证技术的安全性和质量的看法。结果尽管对辅助生殖治疗过程的质量和安全性有很高的信心,但他们认为接受体外受精治疗会产生焦虑。因此,患者积极重视电子见证元素的添加,并认为它增加了他们对体外受精程序的整体信心。与经历过一种或多种辅助生殖治疗的有经验的患者相比,这种趋势在以前没有接受过辅助生殖治疗的“新”患者中越来越明显。患者对电子见证技术表现出强烈的兴趣。因此,重要的是在我们的地理背景下提供证据,解决其成本和对辅助生殖治疗程序质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extended embryo culture up to 14 days Impact of administration route on serum progesterone levels in women undergoing artificial endometrial preparation Efecto de la abstinencia sexual masculina en los resultados reproductivos Sperm DNA fragmentation and microfluidics: A new era in human sperm selection Aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en el laboratorio de reproducción asistida. Trabajo de revisión
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1