‘No longer solid’: perceived impacts of permafrost thaw in three Arctic communities

IF 2 Q3 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Polar Geography Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/1088937X.2022.2105973
J. Ramage, Leneisja Jungsberg, Alexandra L Meyer, S. Gartler
{"title":"‘No longer solid’: perceived impacts of permafrost thaw in three Arctic communities","authors":"J. Ramage, Leneisja Jungsberg, Alexandra L Meyer, S. Gartler","doi":"10.1080/1088937X.2022.2105973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Permafrost characterizes ground conditions in most of the Arctic and is increasingly thawing. While environmental consequences of permafrost thaw are under intense scrutiny by natural and life sciences, social sciences' studies on local communities' perceptions of change is thus far limited. This hinders the development of targeted adaptation and mitigation measures. We present the results of a survey on communities' perceptions of permafrost thaw, with a focus on subsistence activities, carried out between 2019 and 2020 in Aklavik (Northwest Territories, Canada), Longyearbyen (Svalbard, Norway), and Qeqertarsuaq (Qeqertalik Municipality, Greenland). Results show that the majority of the 237 participants are well aware of the consequences of permafrost thaw on the landscape as well as the connection between increased air temperature and permafrost thaw. The majority perceive permafrost thaw negatively although they do not perceive it as a challenge in all life domains. Permafrost thaw is perceived as a major cause for challenges in subsistence activities, infrastructure, and the physical environment. Different perceptions within the three study communities suggests that perceptions of thaw are not solely determined by physical changes but also influenced by factors related to the societal context, including discourses of climate change, cultural background, and land use.","PeriodicalId":46164,"journal":{"name":"Polar Geography","volume":"249 1","pages":"226 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2022.2105973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Permafrost characterizes ground conditions in most of the Arctic and is increasingly thawing. While environmental consequences of permafrost thaw are under intense scrutiny by natural and life sciences, social sciences' studies on local communities' perceptions of change is thus far limited. This hinders the development of targeted adaptation and mitigation measures. We present the results of a survey on communities' perceptions of permafrost thaw, with a focus on subsistence activities, carried out between 2019 and 2020 in Aklavik (Northwest Territories, Canada), Longyearbyen (Svalbard, Norway), and Qeqertarsuaq (Qeqertalik Municipality, Greenland). Results show that the majority of the 237 participants are well aware of the consequences of permafrost thaw on the landscape as well as the connection between increased air temperature and permafrost thaw. The majority perceive permafrost thaw negatively although they do not perceive it as a challenge in all life domains. Permafrost thaw is perceived as a major cause for challenges in subsistence activities, infrastructure, and the physical environment. Different perceptions within the three study communities suggests that perceptions of thaw are not solely determined by physical changes but also influenced by factors related to the societal context, including discourses of climate change, cultural background, and land use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“不再是固体”:三个北极社区永久冻土融化的感知影响
永久冻土是北极大部分地区地面条件的特征,并且正在日益融化。虽然自然科学和生命科学对永久冻土融化的环境后果进行了严格的审查,但社会科学对当地社区对变化的看法的研究迄今为止是有限的。这阻碍了制定有针对性的适应和缓解措施。我们介绍了2019年至2020年间在阿克拉维克(加拿大西北地区)、朗伊尔城(挪威斯瓦尔巴群岛)和Qeqertarsuaq(格陵兰Qeqertalik市)开展的一项社区对永久冻土融化看法调查的结果,重点关注生存活动。结果表明,237名参与者中的大多数人都很清楚永久冻土融化对景观的影响,以及气温升高与永久冻土融化之间的联系。大多数人认为永久冻土融化是负面的,尽管他们并不认为它是所有生命领域的挑战。永久冻土融化被认为是对生存活动、基础设施和自然环境构成挑战的主要原因。三个研究群体的不同看法表明,对解冻的看法不仅取决于物理变化,还受到与社会背景有关的因素的影响,包括气候变化话语、文化背景和土地利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polar Geography
Polar Geography GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Polar Geographyis a quarterly publication that offers a venue for scholarly research on the physical and human aspects of the Polar Regions. The journal seeks to address the component interplay of the natural systems, the complex historical, political, economic, cultural, diplomatic, and security issues, and the interchange amongst them. As such, the journal welcomes comparative approaches, critical scholarship, and alternative and disparate perspectives from around the globe. The journal offers scientists a venue for publishing longer papers such as might result from distillation of a thesis, or review papers that place in global context results from coordinated national and international efforts currently underway in both Polar Regions.
期刊最新文献
Permafrost conditions of the Subpolar Urals based on studies of lateral moraine peatlands Climate services in a rapidly changing environment: an evaluation of the Sea Ice for Walrus Outlook (SIWO) Arctic cooperation between Norway and Russia in healthcare delivery and emergency preparedness on Svalbard: barriers and facilitators Navigating maps in the Arctic: tracing more-than-human interactions of mapping practices in Norwegian rescue services Future Arctic regulatory interventions: discussing the impact of banning the use of heavy fuel oil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1