Comparison of ground reaction forces and joint kinematics between three different tempos during push-up exercise

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Biomedical Human Kinetics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2478/bhk-2022-0010
Yahya Berk Degirmen, B. Erman, M. Z. Ozkol, Faik Vural, Tolga Akşit
{"title":"Comparison of ground reaction forces and joint kinematics between three different tempos during push-up exercise","authors":"Yahya Berk Degirmen, B. Erman, M. Z. Ozkol, Faik Vural, Tolga Akşit","doi":"10.2478/bhk-2022-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Study aim This study was aimed to analysis in detail how different tempos [2:0:2 (30 bpm), 1:0:1 (60 bpm), Explosive (EXP)] effect to ground reaction forces (vGRF) and joint kinematics of push-up exercise (PUP). Material and methods Twenty-four recreationally male athletes (age: 24.9 ± 3.6 years) participated in this study. Kinetic and kinematic data were obtained by load-cells and a motion analysis software. Data was analysed from a single repetition which is showed peak vGRF of dominant side during PUP. Joint velocities were calculated by taking the difference between the descent and ascent phases. Results There was significant difference between 2:0:2 (30 bpm) – EXP in terms of dominant side of shoulder (p ≤ 0.02) and between 1:0:1 (60 bpm) – EXP in the dominant elbow joint displacements (p ≤ 0.05). The velocity differences between the descent and ascent phases of shoulder and elbow joints were found statistically significant between tempos (p ≤ 0.05). In terms of range of motion (ROM) of right and left side, there was significant differences between tempos (p ≤ 0.001). No significant differences were found between all tempos in the ascent phase of right-left and left descent phase in terms of average vGRF (p > 0.05) except right descent average vGRF (p ≤ 0.02). Conclusions In conclusion, right-left sides of ROM was used most effectively in 2:0:2 (30 bpm) and 1:0:1 (60 bpm) tempos. Less displacement was also observed in EXP and when tempo increased percentage of peak vGRF (at elbow flexion phase for right-left sides) to total repetition decreased. Highest ascent and descent phase velocity differences (for right-left sides) and highest peak vGRF (elbow flexion phase) observed in EXP. This study shows that increasing tempo will result in more unsteady joint kinematics and more vGRF, so if the goal is controlled and safe PUP, tempo should be slow.","PeriodicalId":44223,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Human Kinetics","volume":"1 1","pages":"75 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2022-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Study aim This study was aimed to analysis in detail how different tempos [2:0:2 (30 bpm), 1:0:1 (60 bpm), Explosive (EXP)] effect to ground reaction forces (vGRF) and joint kinematics of push-up exercise (PUP). Material and methods Twenty-four recreationally male athletes (age: 24.9 ± 3.6 years) participated in this study. Kinetic and kinematic data were obtained by load-cells and a motion analysis software. Data was analysed from a single repetition which is showed peak vGRF of dominant side during PUP. Joint velocities were calculated by taking the difference between the descent and ascent phases. Results There was significant difference between 2:0:2 (30 bpm) – EXP in terms of dominant side of shoulder (p ≤ 0.02) and between 1:0:1 (60 bpm) – EXP in the dominant elbow joint displacements (p ≤ 0.05). The velocity differences between the descent and ascent phases of shoulder and elbow joints were found statistically significant between tempos (p ≤ 0.05). In terms of range of motion (ROM) of right and left side, there was significant differences between tempos (p ≤ 0.001). No significant differences were found between all tempos in the ascent phase of right-left and left descent phase in terms of average vGRF (p > 0.05) except right descent average vGRF (p ≤ 0.02). Conclusions In conclusion, right-left sides of ROM was used most effectively in 2:0:2 (30 bpm) and 1:0:1 (60 bpm) tempos. Less displacement was also observed in EXP and when tempo increased percentage of peak vGRF (at elbow flexion phase for right-left sides) to total repetition decreased. Highest ascent and descent phase velocity differences (for right-left sides) and highest peak vGRF (elbow flexion phase) observed in EXP. This study shows that increasing tempo will result in more unsteady joint kinematics and more vGRF, so if the goal is controlled and safe PUP, tempo should be slow.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俯卧撑运动中三种不同节奏的地面反作用力及关节运动学比较
摘要研究目的详细分析不同节奏[2:0:2 (30 bpm)、1:0:1 (60 bpm)、爆发力(EXP)]对俯卧撑(PUP)地面反作用力(vGRF)和关节运动学的影响。材料与方法24例娱乐性男性运动员(年龄24.9±3.6岁)参加本研究。通过荷载传感器和运动分析软件获得了动力学和运动学数据。从单次重复分析数据,显示在PUP期间优势侧的vGRF峰值。关节速度是通过取下降和上升阶段之间的差来计算的。结果优势侧肩关节位移在2:0:2 (30 bpm) - EXP之间(p≤0.02)和优势侧肘关节位移在1:0:1 (60 bpm) - EXP之间(p≤0.05)有显著性差异。肩关节和肘关节下降和上升阶段的速度差异有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。在左右侧活动范围(ROM)方面,两种节奏之间存在显著差异(p≤0.001)。除右降期平均vGRF (p≤0.02)外,左降期和右升期各节律的平均vGRF差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。综上所述,在2:0:2 (30bpm)和1:0:1 (60bpm)的节奏下,左、右半部ROM最有效。在实验中也观察到较少的位移,当节奏增加vGRF峰值(在左右侧肘关节屈曲阶段)占总重复的百分比时,位移减少。实验中观察到的最大上升和下降相速度差(左右两侧)和最大vGRF峰值(肘关节弯曲阶段)。本研究表明,增加节奏会导致更不稳定的关节运动学和更多的vGRF,所以如果目标是控制和安全的PUP,节奏应该缓慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Human Kinetics
Biomedical Human Kinetics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading idea is the health-directed quality of life. The journal thus covers many biomedical areas related to physical activity, e.g. physiology, biochemistry, biomechanics, anthropology, medical issues associated with physical activities, physical and motor development, psychological and sociological issues associated with physical activities, rehabilitation, health-related sport issues and fitness, etc.
期刊最新文献
Bone mineral density in the various regions of the skeleton in women with subclinical hypothyroidism: the effect of biological factors, bone turnover markers and physical activity Metabolic disturbances in sedentary and active Polish male students with normal body mass index and waist circumference Rifle and aiming point accelerations do not differ between the most and least accurate shots in biathlon shooting within an athlete Physical fitness and somatic structure in adolescent taekwondo athletes and untrained peers Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injuries in combat sports practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1