Nonlinearly Constrained Optimization Using Heuristic Penalty Methods and Asynchronous Parallel Generating Set Search

J. Griffin, T. Kolda
{"title":"Nonlinearly Constrained Optimization Using Heuristic Penalty Methods and Asynchronous Parallel Generating Set Search","authors":"J. Griffin, T. Kolda","doi":"10.1093/AMRX/ABQ003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many optimization problems are characterized by expensive objective and/or constraint function evaluations paired with a lack of derivative information. Direct search methods such as generating set search (GSS) are well understood and efficient for derivative-free optimization of unconstrained and linearly constrained problems. This paper presents a study of heuristic algorithms that address the more difficult problem of general nonlinear constraints where derivatives for objective or constraint functions are unavailable. We focus on penalty methods that use GSS to solve a sequence of linearly constrained problems, numerically comparing different penalty functions. A classical choice for penalizing constraint violations is � 2 , the squared � 2 norm, which has advantages for derivative-based optimization methods. In our numerical tests, however, we show that exact penalty functions based on the � 1, � 2 ,a nd� ∞ norms converge to good approximate solutions more quickly and thus are attractive alternatives. Unfortunately, exact penalty functions are nondifferentiable and consequently degrade the final solution accuracy, so we also consider smoothed variants. Smoothed-exact penalty functions are attractive because they retain the differentiability of the original problem. Numerically, they are a compromise between exact and � 2 , i.e., they converge to a good solution somewhat quickly without sacrificing much solution accuracy. Moreover, the smoothing is parameterized and can potentially be adjusted to balance the two considerations. Since our","PeriodicalId":89656,"journal":{"name":"Applied mathematics research express : AMRX","volume":"76 1","pages":"36-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied mathematics research express : AMRX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/AMRX/ABQ003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Many optimization problems are characterized by expensive objective and/or constraint function evaluations paired with a lack of derivative information. Direct search methods such as generating set search (GSS) are well understood and efficient for derivative-free optimization of unconstrained and linearly constrained problems. This paper presents a study of heuristic algorithms that address the more difficult problem of general nonlinear constraints where derivatives for objective or constraint functions are unavailable. We focus on penalty methods that use GSS to solve a sequence of linearly constrained problems, numerically comparing different penalty functions. A classical choice for penalizing constraint violations is � 2 , the squared � 2 norm, which has advantages for derivative-based optimization methods. In our numerical tests, however, we show that exact penalty functions based on the � 1, � 2 ,a nd� ∞ norms converge to good approximate solutions more quickly and thus are attractive alternatives. Unfortunately, exact penalty functions are nondifferentiable and consequently degrade the final solution accuracy, so we also consider smoothed variants. Smoothed-exact penalty functions are attractive because they retain the differentiability of the original problem. Numerically, they are a compromise between exact and � 2 , i.e., they converge to a good solution somewhat quickly without sacrificing much solution accuracy. Moreover, the smoothing is parameterized and can potentially be adjusted to balance the two considerations. Since our
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于启发式惩罚法和异步并行发电集搜索的非线性约束优化
许多优化问题的特点是昂贵的目标和/或约束函数评估与缺乏导数信息配对。直接搜索方法,如生成集搜索(GSS),对于无约束和线性约束问题的无导数优化是很容易理解和有效的。本文提出了一种启发式算法的研究,该算法解决了更困难的一般非线性约束问题,其中目标函数或约束函数的导数不可用。我们专注于惩罚方法,使用GSS来解决一系列线性约束问题,数值比较不同的惩罚函数。惩罚违反约束的经典选择是2,即2范数的平方,这对于基于导数的优化方法具有优势。然而,在我们的数值测试中,我们表明基于“1”、“2”、“a”和“∞”范数的精确惩罚函数更快地收敛到良好的近似解,因此是有吸引力的替代方案。不幸的是,精确惩罚函数是不可微的,因此降低了最终解的精度,因此我们也考虑光滑的变体。光滑精确惩罚函数很有吸引力,因为它们保留了原问题的可微性。在数值上,它们是介于exact和- 2之间的折衷,也就是说,它们在不牺牲太多解精度的情况下较快地收敛到一个好的解。此外,平滑是参数化的,可以潜在地调整以平衡这两个考虑。因为我们的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real Analyticity of Radiation Patterns on Asymptotically Hyperbolic Manifolds Upscaling of Solid-electrolyte Composite Intercalation Cathodes for Energy Storage Systems A bound on the pseudospectrum for a class of non-normal Schrödinger operators. Aharonov–Bohm Effect in Resonances for Scattering by Three Solenoids at Large Separation A Diffusion Limit for a Finite Capacity Storage Allocation Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1