From Neoreaction to Alt-Right: A Schmittian Perspective

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY Telos Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3817/0322198090
Courtney Hodrick
{"title":"From Neoreaction to Alt-Right: A Schmittian Perspective","authors":"Courtney Hodrick","doi":"10.3817/0322198090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2009, libertarian billionaire Peter Thiel wrote, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”1 Thiel’s statement challenged the basic premise of much of Western politics: the liberal democratic consensus that treats economic freedom and political democracy as two guiding stars to be pursued in tandem.2 In the decade since, the rise in conservative populist movements and leaders from Brexit to Bolsonaro, and particularly the 2016 election of Donald Trump as president of the United States, led many scholars to conclude that the liberal democratic consensus had collapsed–or was never really a consensus to begin with.3 The question then becomes: what will replace liberal democracy?.","PeriodicalId":43573,"journal":{"name":"Telos","volume":"18 1","pages":"90 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3817/0322198090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2009, libertarian billionaire Peter Thiel wrote, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”1 Thiel’s statement challenged the basic premise of much of Western politics: the liberal democratic consensus that treats economic freedom and political democracy as two guiding stars to be pursued in tandem.2 In the decade since, the rise in conservative populist movements and leaders from Brexit to Bolsonaro, and particularly the 2016 election of Donald Trump as president of the United States, led many scholars to conclude that the liberal democratic consensus had collapsed–or was never really a consensus to begin with.3 The question then becomes: what will replace liberal democracy?.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从新反动到另类右翼:一个施密特的视角
2009年,自由主义亿万富翁彼得·蒂尔(Peter Thiel)写道:“我不再相信自由和民主是相容的。蒂尔的声明挑战了西方政治的基本前提:自由民主共识,将经济自由和政治民主视为两颗指引的星星,需要同时追求在那之后的十年里,从英国脱欧到博尔索纳罗,保守派民粹主义运动和领导人的崛起,尤其是2016年唐纳德·特朗普当选美国总统,导致许多学者得出结论,自由民主共识已经崩溃——或者从一开始就不是一个真正的共识那么问题就变成了:什么将取代自由民主?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telos
Telos Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The Early Christian Origins of Secularization Nationality of Food: Cultural Politics on the UNESCO List of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Food Museums Horizontality vs. Verticality: New Readings in the Understanding of Religion and the Organizing of Politics In Memoriam: Fred Siegel Islam and the Promotion of Human Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1