The History of Gender Inequality: Analysis of Gender Inequality as a Colonial Legacy in Africa

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Gender Technology & Development Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n3a9
Mohammed Xolile Ntshangase, Tlhakodisho Joel Matabane
{"title":"The History of Gender Inequality: Analysis of Gender Inequality as a Colonial Legacy in Africa","authors":"Mohammed Xolile Ntshangase, Tlhakodisho Joel Matabane","doi":"10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n3a9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The colonial legacy of African underdevelopment is widely debated but hardly written. Boserup’s theory advances the argument that African system of government prior to the colonial one had a deeply encultured notion of gender inequality. However, this work is set forth to argue that colonization was a radical disruption that brought serious imbalances that include gender inequality. Within the process of colonization, gender inequality helped as one of the tools to advance Africa’s underdevelopment. Against Boserup’s view, this paper will investigate the hypothesis that African gender inequality and female disempowerment are rooted in the colonial epoch. It is argued that the arrival of Europeans in Uganda ignited a century-long transformation of Kampala including a gender Kuznets curve. Boserup’s theory relates that as men rapidly acquired literacy and quickly found their way into white-collar employment in the economic system built by Europeans, women took longer to obtain literacy and enter decent jobs. Among other factors, this is one of those that gravely created a noticeable gap which aided gender inequality between the African men and women. Different works by African scholars will be consulted in attempt to clarify the argument that Boserup’s theory provides the incorrect view about African normative culture. Boserup argues that after Uganda’s independence in 1962 another wave of inequality took place as some women got educated and got decent jobs while some continued operating within the informal traditional economic system. In her writings, Boserup seems skewed towards the argument that African traditional system always had gender inequality embedded in it, but she does not care much to elaborate the background framework that makes her have that view. It seems somewhat indefensible to argue that brutal elements of the society like gender inequality are rooted within the traditional norms because that may create a situation whereby the underdeveloped gender, due to love of their tradition, do not make effort to better themselves. It is for that reason that this paper adopts analytic theoretical framework to critically analyse Boserup’s theoretical view that gender inequality was rooted in the indigenous African norms.","PeriodicalId":45357,"journal":{"name":"Gender Technology & Development","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Technology & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n3a9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The colonial legacy of African underdevelopment is widely debated but hardly written. Boserup’s theory advances the argument that African system of government prior to the colonial one had a deeply encultured notion of gender inequality. However, this work is set forth to argue that colonization was a radical disruption that brought serious imbalances that include gender inequality. Within the process of colonization, gender inequality helped as one of the tools to advance Africa’s underdevelopment. Against Boserup’s view, this paper will investigate the hypothesis that African gender inequality and female disempowerment are rooted in the colonial epoch. It is argued that the arrival of Europeans in Uganda ignited a century-long transformation of Kampala including a gender Kuznets curve. Boserup’s theory relates that as men rapidly acquired literacy and quickly found their way into white-collar employment in the economic system built by Europeans, women took longer to obtain literacy and enter decent jobs. Among other factors, this is one of those that gravely created a noticeable gap which aided gender inequality between the African men and women. Different works by African scholars will be consulted in attempt to clarify the argument that Boserup’s theory provides the incorrect view about African normative culture. Boserup argues that after Uganda’s independence in 1962 another wave of inequality took place as some women got educated and got decent jobs while some continued operating within the informal traditional economic system. In her writings, Boserup seems skewed towards the argument that African traditional system always had gender inequality embedded in it, but she does not care much to elaborate the background framework that makes her have that view. It seems somewhat indefensible to argue that brutal elements of the society like gender inequality are rooted within the traditional norms because that may create a situation whereby the underdeveloped gender, due to love of their tradition, do not make effort to better themselves. It is for that reason that this paper adopts analytic theoretical framework to critically analyse Boserup’s theoretical view that gender inequality was rooted in the indigenous African norms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别不平等的历史:性别不平等作为非洲殖民遗产的分析
非洲欠发达的殖民遗产引起了广泛的争论,但鲜有文字记载。Boserup的理论提出了一个论点,即在殖民统治之前的非洲政府体系中,根深蒂固的性别不平等观念。然而,这项工作是为了证明殖民化是一种激进的破坏,它带来了包括性别不平等在内的严重不平衡。在殖民化的过程中,性别不平等成为推动非洲欠发达的工具之一。与Boserup的观点相反,本文将调查非洲性别不平等和女性权力剥夺的假设,这些假设植根于殖民时代。有人认为,欧洲人的到来点燃了坎帕拉长达一个世纪的转变,包括性别库兹涅茨曲线。Boserup的理论认为,在欧洲人建立的经济体系中,男性迅速获得识字能力并迅速找到白领工作,而女性则需要更长的时间才能获得识字能力并找到体面的工作。除其他因素外,这是严重造成明显差距的因素之一,这种差距助长了非洲男女之间的性别不平等。将参考非洲学者的不同著作,试图澄清Boserup的理论提供了关于非洲规范文化的错误观点。Boserup认为,1962年乌干达独立后,另一波不平等浪潮发生了,一些妇女接受了教育,找到了体面的工作,而另一些妇女继续在非正式的传统经济体系中工作。在她的作品中,Boserup似乎倾向于认为非洲传统制度中一直存在性别不平等,但她并没有过多地阐述使她产生这种观点的背景框架。认为社会的残酷因素,如性别不平等,根植于传统规范中,似乎有些站不住脚,因为这可能会造成一种情况,即不发达的性别,由于对传统的热爱,不努力改善自己。正因如此,本文采用分析性的理论框架,对博色鲁普关于性别不平等根源于非洲本土规范的理论观点进行批判性的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gender Technology & Development
Gender Technology & Development SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Gender, Technology and Development is an international, multi-disciplinary, refereed journal serving as a forum for exploring the linkages among changing gender relations, technological change and developing societies. The journal"s main focus is on the shifting boundaries and meanings of gender, technology and development, addressing transnational phenomena and engaging in dialogues that cut across geographical boundaries.
期刊最新文献
Gender exclusion in Indonesia’s community-based forest management extension program What agricultural transition means for women in male-headed households in South Asia: an in-depth exploration of intrahousehold evaluation processes Women’s (im)mobility strategies and digital platform adoption: the case study of employees doing desk work in Pune, India Women’s autonomy and old age pension transfer in South Africa Women fish vendors in Kerala, India: an analytical study of access to inputs and services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1