Arkitektur og politik: Atmosfæriske refleksioner ud fra Böhme og Sloterdijk

L. Jørgensen, C. Borch
{"title":"Arkitektur og politik: Atmosfæriske refleksioner ud fra Böhme og Sloterdijk","authors":"L. Jørgensen, C. Borch","doi":"10.7146/politik.v21i2.111409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of atmosphere occupies an increasingly central role in present-day discussions of design, affect, architecture and sensory environments. It is mobilized in particular to emphasize and shed light on a pre-subjective, embodied apprehension of spatially discharged moods. This article especially focuses on how the notion of atmosphere offers new ways of understanding the relations between architecture and politics. Specifically, we explore such relations via the philosophical reflections on atmosphere as found in Gernot Böhme’s and Peter Sloterdijk’s work. We suggest that, in spite of significant difference between Böhme and Sloterdijk, they each offers important insights into how architecture and politics are entangled. After a brief outline of each of their general atmospheric projects, we demonstrate the different critical potential their analyses of architecture and the politics of space entail.","PeriodicalId":32549,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Politik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v21i2.111409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The notion of atmosphere occupies an increasingly central role in present-day discussions of design, affect, architecture and sensory environments. It is mobilized in particular to emphasize and shed light on a pre-subjective, embodied apprehension of spatially discharged moods. This article especially focuses on how the notion of atmosphere offers new ways of understanding the relations between architecture and politics. Specifically, we explore such relations via the philosophical reflections on atmosphere as found in Gernot Böhme’s and Peter Sloterdijk’s work. We suggest that, in spite of significant difference between Böhme and Sloterdijk, they each offers important insights into how architecture and politics are entangled. After a brief outline of each of their general atmospheric projects, we demonstrate the different critical potential their analyses of architecture and the politics of space entail.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在当今关于设计、情感、建筑和感官环境的讨论中,气氛的概念占据着越来越重要的地位。它特别强调并阐明了对空间释放情绪的前主观、具体化的理解。本文特别关注大气的概念如何为理解建筑与政治之间的关系提供了新的途径。具体来说,我们通过在Gernot Böhme和Peter Sloterdijk的作品中发现的对大气的哲学思考来探索这种关系。我们认为,尽管Böhme和Sloterdijk之间存在显著差异,但它们都为建筑和政治如何纠缠提供了重要的见解。在简要介绍了他们的每个一般大气项目之后,我们展示了他们对建筑和空间政治的分析所带来的不同批判潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electoral System and Party Survival: The Case of Indonesian Democracy 1999-2019 Educational Intervention Program for Young Voters: Improving Political Knowledge and Voting Behavior in the 2020 Simultaneous Local Elections Role of The State Intelligence Agency in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia The Incumbent’s Curse, Party Institutionalization, and Competitive Factionalism in the Candidacy for South Halmahera Election in 2020 The Views and Movement of the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) Movement towards Global Capitalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1