T. Uchida, K. Shibuya, Gustavo Richmond-Navarro, W. Calderón-Muñoz
{"title":"A wind tunnel investigation of yawed wind turbine wake impacts on downwind wind turbine performances and wind loads","authors":"T. Uchida, K. Shibuya, Gustavo Richmond-Navarro, W. Calderón-Muñoz","doi":"10.1177/0309524X221150219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current work we experimentally explored yawed wind turbine wake impacts on downwind wind turbine performances and wind loads. The lab-scale wind turbine model with a rotor diameter (D) of 0.442 m and a height of 1 m (=2.26D) was installed in a closed-circuit boundary layer wind tunnel (test section: 15 m long × 3.6 m wide × 2.0 m high) of the Research Institute for Applied Mechanics (RIAM) of Kyushu University. Power performance tests were initially conducted with a single rotor in isolation in order to characterize a rotor’s power output in stand-alone conditions. A detailed comparison of the tests revealed that the power output decreased rapidly as the yaw angle (γ) increased. It is presumed that the power output decrease in yawed cases is mainly due to the decrease in the effective rotor area and the change in the angle of the incoming wind flow with respect to the wind turbine blade. Next, using two wind turbine models aligned with the dominant inflow direction, the merging wakes behaviors caused by three different lateral separation distances were tested: (a) Case 1 (y = 0), (b) Case 2 (y = 0.5D), and (c) Case 3 (y = 1D). Here, the separation distance between the two wind turbine models was fixed at 6D in all cases. Extremely large power output deficits of 46%–76% were seen in the Case 1 configuration. This is mainly due to the significant wake velocity deficits induced by the upwind wind turbine model. In the Case 2 configuration with γ values of 20° and 30°, a significant increase in the power output of the downwind wind turbines was observed. Similar to Case 1 configuration, these results are considered to be mainly due to the upwind turbine-induced wake velocity deficits and wake deflection. Finally, in the Case 3 configuration, no significant difference was found in all of the results, and the tendency was almost the same. We show that the wake velocity deficits induced by the upwind wind turbine model had almost no effect on the power output of the downwind wind turbine model. We evaluated the total power output of the two turbines. As a result, in the Case 2 configuration with 20° yaw angle, the total power output of the two wind turbine models was the highest due to the increase in the power output of the downwind wind turbine model. In order to investigate the main cause of the significant increase in the power output of the downwind wind turbine model at 20° and 30° yaw angles in the Case 2 configuration, we measured the lateral wind speed distribution at the 6D position on the downwind side of the upwind wind turbine model by using the ultrasonic anemometer. As a results, it was clarified that the peak of the wake velocity deficits induced by the upwind wind turbine model is clearly shifted away from the downwind turbine such that it experiences a smaller deficit due to wake steering. Also, with wake steering the upwind turbine-induced wake velocity deficits may be smaller due to the reduction in rotor area. Finally, it is extremely important to understand the wind load acting on the downwind wind turbine model operating within the wake region induced by the upwind yawed wind turbine model when the maximum power output is generated. It can be seen that as the yaw angle of the upwind wind turbine model increased, the power output generated by the downwind wind turbine model and the streamwise wind load acting on it also increased. However, it was also clarified that the streamwise wind load acting on the downwind wind turbine model in this situation did not exceed the stand-alone value.","PeriodicalId":51570,"journal":{"name":"Wind Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X221150219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In the current work we experimentally explored yawed wind turbine wake impacts on downwind wind turbine performances and wind loads. The lab-scale wind turbine model with a rotor diameter (D) of 0.442 m and a height of 1 m (=2.26D) was installed in a closed-circuit boundary layer wind tunnel (test section: 15 m long × 3.6 m wide × 2.0 m high) of the Research Institute for Applied Mechanics (RIAM) of Kyushu University. Power performance tests were initially conducted with a single rotor in isolation in order to characterize a rotor’s power output in stand-alone conditions. A detailed comparison of the tests revealed that the power output decreased rapidly as the yaw angle (γ) increased. It is presumed that the power output decrease in yawed cases is mainly due to the decrease in the effective rotor area and the change in the angle of the incoming wind flow with respect to the wind turbine blade. Next, using two wind turbine models aligned with the dominant inflow direction, the merging wakes behaviors caused by three different lateral separation distances were tested: (a) Case 1 (y = 0), (b) Case 2 (y = 0.5D), and (c) Case 3 (y = 1D). Here, the separation distance between the two wind turbine models was fixed at 6D in all cases. Extremely large power output deficits of 46%–76% were seen in the Case 1 configuration. This is mainly due to the significant wake velocity deficits induced by the upwind wind turbine model. In the Case 2 configuration with γ values of 20° and 30°, a significant increase in the power output of the downwind wind turbines was observed. Similar to Case 1 configuration, these results are considered to be mainly due to the upwind turbine-induced wake velocity deficits and wake deflection. Finally, in the Case 3 configuration, no significant difference was found in all of the results, and the tendency was almost the same. We show that the wake velocity deficits induced by the upwind wind turbine model had almost no effect on the power output of the downwind wind turbine model. We evaluated the total power output of the two turbines. As a result, in the Case 2 configuration with 20° yaw angle, the total power output of the two wind turbine models was the highest due to the increase in the power output of the downwind wind turbine model. In order to investigate the main cause of the significant increase in the power output of the downwind wind turbine model at 20° and 30° yaw angles in the Case 2 configuration, we measured the lateral wind speed distribution at the 6D position on the downwind side of the upwind wind turbine model by using the ultrasonic anemometer. As a results, it was clarified that the peak of the wake velocity deficits induced by the upwind wind turbine model is clearly shifted away from the downwind turbine such that it experiences a smaller deficit due to wake steering. Also, with wake steering the upwind turbine-induced wake velocity deficits may be smaller due to the reduction in rotor area. Finally, it is extremely important to understand the wind load acting on the downwind wind turbine model operating within the wake region induced by the upwind yawed wind turbine model when the maximum power output is generated. It can be seen that as the yaw angle of the upwind wind turbine model increased, the power output generated by the downwind wind turbine model and the streamwise wind load acting on it also increased. However, it was also clarified that the streamwise wind load acting on the downwind wind turbine model in this situation did not exceed the stand-alone value.
在目前的工作中,我们实验探讨了偏航风力机尾迹对顺风风力机性能和风荷载的影响。将转子直径(D)为0.442 m,高度为1 m (=2.26D)的实验室规模风力机模型安装在九州大学应用力学研究所(RIAM)的闭环边界层风洞(试验段:长15 m ×宽3.6 m ×高2.0 m)中。功率性能测试最初是在隔离的单个转子上进行的,以表征转子在独立条件下的功率输出。试验的详细比较表明,功率输出随着偏航角(γ)的增加而迅速下降。假设偏航情况下功率输出的减少主要是由于有效转子面积的减小和来风气流相对于风力机叶片角度的变化。接下来,使用两种与主导入流方向对齐的风力机模型,测试了三种不同侧向分离距离导致的合并尾迹行为:(a) Case 1 (y = 0), (b) Case 2 (y = 0.5D)和(c) Case 3 (y = 1D)。在这里,两个风力机模型之间的分离距离在所有情况下都固定为6D。在案例1配置中可以看到46%-76%的极大功率输出赤字。这主要是由于逆风风力机模型引起的显著尾流速度赤字。在γ值为20°和30°的Case 2配置中,观察到下风风力机的输出功率显著增加。与案例1的配置类似,这些结果被认为主要是由于迎风涡轮引起的尾流速度赤字和尾流偏转。最后,在Case 3配置中,所有结果没有发现显著差异,趋势几乎相同。结果表明,顺风模型引起的尾流速度缺陷对顺风模型的输出功率几乎没有影响。我们评估了两台涡轮机的总输出功率。因此,在20°偏航角的Case 2配置下,由于下风风力机模型的输出功率增加,两种风力机模型的总输出功率最高。为了探究Case 2配置下20°和30°偏航角下顺风风力机模型输出功率显著增加的主要原因,我们利用超声波风速仪测量了顺风风力机模型下风侧6D位置的侧向风速分布。结果表明,由逆风风力机模型引起的尾流速度赤字的峰值明显偏离了下风风力机,从而使其由于尾流转向而经历较小的赤字。此外,随着尾流转向,由于转子面积的减少,逆风涡轮诱导的尾流速度赤字可能更小。最后,了解顺风偏航风力机模型在产生最大输出功率时,在顺风偏航风力机模型诱导的尾迹区域内运行的顺风风力机模型所承受的风荷载是非常重要的。可以看出,随着上风向风力机模型偏航角的增大,下风向风力机模型的输出功率和作用在其上的顺流风荷载也随之增大。然而,也澄清了在这种情况下作用在顺风风力机模型上的顺流风荷载没有超过单机值。
期刊介绍:
Having been in continuous publication since 1977, Wind Engineering is the oldest and most authoritative English language journal devoted entirely to the technology of wind energy. Under the direction of a distinguished editor and editorial board, Wind Engineering appears bimonthly with fully refereed contributions from active figures in the field, book notices, and summaries of the more interesting papers from other sources. Papers are published in Wind Engineering on: the aerodynamics of rotors and blades; machine subsystems and components; design; test programmes; power generation and transmission; measuring and recording techniques; installations and applications; and economic, environmental and legal aspects.