Antibiotic Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains in the Patients Admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran (2016-2018)

R. Miladi, M. Zamanian, A. Janbakhsh, F. Mansouri, B. Sayad, M. Afsharian, S. Vaziri, Zeinab Mohseni Afshar, M. Shirvani, Mitra Tarlan, S. Khazaei
{"title":"Antibiotic Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains in the Patients Admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran (2016-2018)","authors":"R. Miladi, M. Zamanian, A. Janbakhsh, F. Mansouri, B. Sayad, M. Afsharian, S. Vaziri, Zeinab Mohseni Afshar, M. Shirvani, Mitra Tarlan, S. Khazaei","doi":"10.5812/jkums.108939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nosocomial infections are important medical concerns in developed and developing countries. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is considered the third leading cause of nosocomial infections following Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Objectives: The present study aimed to determine the antibiotic resistance of isolated P. aeruginosa strains in the patients admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted on 900 patients with positive P. aeruginosa cultures who were admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran during 2016-2018. Bacterial isolates were separated using laboratory tests, and the standard disc-diffusion method was used to assess antibiotic susceptibility based on the CLSI protocol. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 24. Results: The majority of the P. aeruginosa-positive cases were isolated from the emergency ward (44.3%), intensive care unit (21.9%), blood samples (40.4%), and urine samples (18.7%). The highest antibiotic resistance was observed against cotrimoxazole, ceftriaxone, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, nitrofurantoin, nalidixic acid, cefazolin, and cefixime. In addition, ciprofloxacin and imipenem were the most effective antibiotics against P. aeruginosa with the sensitivity of 68.1% and 57.2%, respectively. Conclusions: According to the results, P. aeruginosa had high resistance against antibiotics such as cotrimoxazole and ceftriaxone. Therefore, these antibiotics should be used correctly and reasonably, and epidemiological studies in this regard should be focused on proposing national programs to prevent the further spread of antibiotic resistance.","PeriodicalId":16201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums.108939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nosocomial infections are important medical concerns in developed and developing countries. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is considered the third leading cause of nosocomial infections following Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Objectives: The present study aimed to determine the antibiotic resistance of isolated P. aeruginosa strains in the patients admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted on 900 patients with positive P. aeruginosa cultures who were admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran during 2016-2018. Bacterial isolates were separated using laboratory tests, and the standard disc-diffusion method was used to assess antibiotic susceptibility based on the CLSI protocol. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 24. Results: The majority of the P. aeruginosa-positive cases were isolated from the emergency ward (44.3%), intensive care unit (21.9%), blood samples (40.4%), and urine samples (18.7%). The highest antibiotic resistance was observed against cotrimoxazole, ceftriaxone, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, nitrofurantoin, nalidixic acid, cefazolin, and cefixime. In addition, ciprofloxacin and imipenem were the most effective antibiotics against P. aeruginosa with the sensitivity of 68.1% and 57.2%, respectively. Conclusions: According to the results, P. aeruginosa had high resistance against antibiotics such as cotrimoxazole and ceftriaxone. Therefore, these antibiotics should be used correctly and reasonably, and epidemiological studies in this regard should be focused on proposing national programs to prevent the further spread of antibiotic resistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗克尔曼沙阿伊玛目礼萨医院住院患者铜绿假单胞菌耐药性分析(2016-2018年)
背景:医院感染在发达国家和发展中国家都是重要的医疗问题。铜绿假单胞菌被认为是继金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌之后医院感染的第三大原因。目的:本研究旨在确定伊朗克尔曼沙阿伊玛目礼萨医院住院患者中分离的铜绿假单胞菌菌株的抗生素耐药性。方法:对2016-2018年在伊朗克尔曼沙阿伊玛目礼萨医院入院的900例铜绿假单胞菌培养阳性患者进行了描述性横断面研究。采用实验室分离法分离细菌,并根据CLSI方案采用标准圆盘扩散法评估抗生素敏感性。数据分析采用SPSS version 24进行。结果:铜绿假单胞菌阳性病例主要来自急诊病房(44.3%)、重症监护病房(21.9%)、血液(40.4%)和尿液(18.7%)。对复方新诺明、头孢曲松、氨苄西林、氨苄西林-舒巴坦、呋喃妥因、萘啶酸、头孢唑林和头孢克肟的耐药性最高。此外,环丙沙星和亚胺培南是对铜绿假单胞菌最有效的抗生素,敏感性分别为68.1%和57.2%。结论:铜绿假单胞菌对复方新诺明、头孢曲松等抗生素均有较高耐药性。因此,应正确合理地使用这些抗生素,并在这方面的流行病学研究应侧重于提出国家规划,以防止抗生素耐药性的进一步传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Effective Are In-Hospital Training Workshops on Infection Control for Physicians? First Report in Iran Capability of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Neonatal Care Quality in Iran Medicinal Chemistry is Shaping the World of Therapy Search Trends for Micronutrients on Google Trends in Iran for Historical Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Ecological Study The Effect of Quadruple Therapy Plus Probiotics on Helicobacter Pylori Eradication and Antibiotic-Associated Side Effects: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1