Comparing the Seizure-Induced Impairment of Short-Term Plasticity in Dorsal and Ventral Hippocampus in Kindled Mice

Nahid Roohi, M. Ahmadi, Yaghoun Fathollahi, A. Shojaei, J. Mirnajafi-zadeh
{"title":"Comparing the Seizure-Induced Impairment of Short-Term Plasticity in Dorsal and Ventral Hippocampus in Kindled Mice","authors":"Nahid Roohi, M. Ahmadi, Yaghoun Fathollahi, A. Shojaei, J. Mirnajafi-zadeh","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2021.1854.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many differences among dorsal and ventral hippocampal neural circuits that affect the synaptic plasticity. In this study we compared the occurrence of short-term plasticity in the field excitatory post synaptic potentials (fEPSP) in dorsal and ventral hippocampal CA1 area following kindled seizures. Animals (male C57 B6/J mice, 12 weeks of age) were kindled by intraperitoneal injections of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) and fEPSPs were recorded from dorsal and ventral hippocampal slices. Short-term plasticity was evaluated by measuring fEPSP-slope and fEPSP-area following paired-pulse stimulation delivered at three inter-pulse intervals (20, 80 and 160 ms). Obtained results showed that in control slices fEPSP-slope was greater in ventral- compared to dorsal hippocampus, but there was no difference in fEPSP-area among two regions. In hippocampal slices of kindled animals, fEPSP-slope was similar in dorsal and ventral regions, but fEPSP-area was greater in ventral- compared to dorsal hippocampus. In addition, fEPSP-area was greater in kindled compared to control group only in ventral hippocampus. PTZ kindled slices showed impaired short-term facilitation and the paired-pulse index was reduced only at dorsal hippocampal slices. Kindling had no significant effect on paired-pulse ratio in ventral hippocampal slices. Our findings indicated that the seizure occurrence affected the neural activity of hippocampus in a regional dependent manner. Although kindling increased fEPSP-area in ventral hippocampus, kindling-induced changes in short-term synaptic plasticity was significant only in dorsal hippocampal slices compared to control group. The difference in the responses of hippocampal dorsal and ventral poles has to be considered in the future researches.","PeriodicalId":8728,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2021.1854.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are many differences among dorsal and ventral hippocampal neural circuits that affect the synaptic plasticity. In this study we compared the occurrence of short-term plasticity in the field excitatory post synaptic potentials (fEPSP) in dorsal and ventral hippocampal CA1 area following kindled seizures. Animals (male C57 B6/J mice, 12 weeks of age) were kindled by intraperitoneal injections of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) and fEPSPs were recorded from dorsal and ventral hippocampal slices. Short-term plasticity was evaluated by measuring fEPSP-slope and fEPSP-area following paired-pulse stimulation delivered at three inter-pulse intervals (20, 80 and 160 ms). Obtained results showed that in control slices fEPSP-slope was greater in ventral- compared to dorsal hippocampus, but there was no difference in fEPSP-area among two regions. In hippocampal slices of kindled animals, fEPSP-slope was similar in dorsal and ventral regions, but fEPSP-area was greater in ventral- compared to dorsal hippocampus. In addition, fEPSP-area was greater in kindled compared to control group only in ventral hippocampus. PTZ kindled slices showed impaired short-term facilitation and the paired-pulse index was reduced only at dorsal hippocampal slices. Kindling had no significant effect on paired-pulse ratio in ventral hippocampal slices. Our findings indicated that the seizure occurrence affected the neural activity of hippocampus in a regional dependent manner. Although kindling increased fEPSP-area in ventral hippocampus, kindling-induced changes in short-term synaptic plasticity was significant only in dorsal hippocampal slices compared to control group. The difference in the responses of hippocampal dorsal and ventral poles has to be considered in the future researches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癫痫致点燃小鼠海马背侧和腹侧短期可塑性损伤的比较
海马背侧和腹侧神经回路有许多差异,影响突触的可塑性。本研究比较了点燃性癫痫发作后海马背侧和腹侧CA1区场兴奋性突触后电位(fEPSP)的短期可塑性。动物(雄性C57 B6/J小鼠,12周龄)腹腔注射戊四唑(PTZ)点燃,海马背侧和腹侧切片记录fEPSPs。在三个脉冲间隔(20、80和160 ms)进行配对脉冲刺激后,通过测量fepsp斜率和fepsp面积来评估短期可塑性。结果表明,在对照切片中,腹侧海马区fepsp -斜率大于背侧海马区,但两个区域之间的fepsp -面积没有差异。在点燃动物海马切片中,背侧和腹侧的fepsp斜率相似,但腹侧的fepsp面积大于背侧。此外,点燃组仅腹侧海马区fepsp面积大于对照组。PTZ点燃切片显示短期促进功能受损,配对脉冲指数仅在海马背侧切片降低。点燃对海马腹侧切片成对脉冲比无显著影响。结果表明,癫痫发作对海马神经活动的影响具有区域依赖性。与对照组相比,虽然点燃增加了腹侧海马的fepsp区域,但点燃引起的短期突触可塑性变化仅在海马背侧切片中显著。海马背极和腹极的反应差异需要在今后的研究中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gender Effect on Neural Correlates of Autobiographical False Memories for Brand Images The Effect of Omega-3 Supplementation on Serum Levels of Antioxidant Status in Patients With Bipolar Disease: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial Conditioned Medium Derived from the Human Amniotic Membrane Prevents Brain Damage against Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion in Three Phases, Subacute, Acute, and Chronic in a Stroke Model in Rats Investigating Facilitatory Effects of Lithium on Methamphetamine-induced Spatial Memory Impairments in Rat Electroencephalograph Emotion Classification Using a Novel Adaptive Ensemble Classifier Considering Personality Traits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1