A comparative corpus-based investigation of results sections of research articles in Applied Linguistics and Physics

Muhammed Parviz
{"title":"A comparative corpus-based investigation of results sections of research articles in Applied Linguistics and Physics","authors":"Muhammed Parviz","doi":"10.2478/icame-2023-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present study sought to identify the generic structures of the results sections of scientific research articles (RAs) between Applied Linguistics and Physics. Following a manual search approach, a total of 200 RAs in the field of Applied Linguistics and Physics from different top prestigious journals randomly were singled out and analyzed. In addition to offering a tentative template for the rhetorical organizations of results sections, the findings revealed shared and non-shared rhetorical units as well as obligatory and optional steps in the results sections (RSs) of research articles between the disciplines. The findings also indicated that RA writers organize the contents of the RSs around certain rhetorical resources (i.e., M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5) to present key experimental and factual analytical results of their studies. The findings further suggested the existence of common core of rhetorical resources in writing RSs between the disciplines, albeit there are a set of certain steps playing an essential part in distinguishing textual features of each discipline as well as depicting how RSs of individual discipline are developed. The findings generated from the study can offer a number of important pedagogical implications for teaching EAP and ESP courses, especially for Applied Linguistics and Physics teachers and students.","PeriodicalId":73271,"journal":{"name":"ICAME journal : computers in English linguistics","volume":"49 1","pages":"81 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICAME journal : computers in English linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2023-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The present study sought to identify the generic structures of the results sections of scientific research articles (RAs) between Applied Linguistics and Physics. Following a manual search approach, a total of 200 RAs in the field of Applied Linguistics and Physics from different top prestigious journals randomly were singled out and analyzed. In addition to offering a tentative template for the rhetorical organizations of results sections, the findings revealed shared and non-shared rhetorical units as well as obligatory and optional steps in the results sections (RSs) of research articles between the disciplines. The findings also indicated that RA writers organize the contents of the RSs around certain rhetorical resources (i.e., M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5) to present key experimental and factual analytical results of their studies. The findings further suggested the existence of common core of rhetorical resources in writing RSs between the disciplines, albeit there are a set of certain steps playing an essential part in distinguishing textual features of each discipline as well as depicting how RSs of individual discipline are developed. The findings generated from the study can offer a number of important pedagogical implications for teaching EAP and ESP courses, especially for Applied Linguistics and Physics teachers and students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于语料库的应用语言学与物理学研究论文结果部分的比较研究
摘要本研究旨在确定应用语言学和物理学之间的科研论文结果部分的一般结构。采用人工检索的方法,随机抽取应用语言学和物理学领域来自不同顶级权威期刊的200篇RAs论文进行分析。除了为结果部分的修辞组织提供一个尝试性模板外,研究结果还揭示了学科之间研究文章的结果部分(RSs)中的共享和非共享修辞单位以及强制性和可选步骤。研究结果还表明,RA作者围绕一定的修辞资源(即M1、M2、M3、M4和M5)组织RSs的内容,以呈现他们研究的关键实验和事实分析结果。研究结果进一步表明,尽管在区分每个学科的文本特征以及描述单个学科的RSs是如何发展的过程中,有一系列特定的步骤起着至关重要的作用,但不同学科之间的RSs写作中存在共同的修辞资源核心。研究结果可以为EAP和ESP课程的教学提供一些重要的教学启示,特别是对应用语言学和物理学的教师和学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ole Schützler and Julia Schlüter (eds.). Data and methods in corpus linguistics. Comparative approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 357 pp. ISBN 978-1-10849964-4 Compiling a corpus of South Asian online Englishes: A report, some reflections and a pilot study A comparative corpus-based investigation of results sections of research articles in Applied Linguistics and Physics Tony McEnery and Vaclav Brezina. Fundamental principles of corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 313 pp. ISBN 978-1-1071-1062-5 Gender and evaluation in contemporary American English: A corpus study based on pronominal and nominal expressions with male and female reference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1