Overnight Ambulatory Urodynamics Change Patient Management Strategies and Improve Symptomatic Outcomes

R. Axell, H. Yasmin*, K. Aleksejeva, E. Solomon, B. Toia, M. Thommyppillai, M. Pakzad, R. Hamid, J. Ockrim, T. Greenwell
{"title":"Overnight Ambulatory Urodynamics Change Patient Management Strategies and Improve Symptomatic Outcomes","authors":"R. Axell, H. Yasmin*, K. Aleksejeva, E. Solomon, B. Toia, M. Thommyppillai, M. Pakzad, R. Hamid, J. Ockrim, T. Greenwell","doi":"10.48083/rdtd8562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo determine the diagnostic value of overnight ambulatory urodynamics (aUDS) and to assess if a urodynamic diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO) or nocturnal enuresis resulted in a change in patient management and an improvement in their urinary symptoms.MethodsA retrospective review of 25 consecutive patients (28% male) with a median age of 38 years (range 18 to 86) having overnight aUDS for bothersome urinary symptoms of primarily nocturia and/or nocturnal enuresis following non-diagnostic conventional urodynamics between November 1998 and August 2018. Urinary symptoms were assessed before overnight aUDS and again after urological treatment following any changes in urodynamics diagnosis and treatment. Six patients were excluded as follow-up data were not available.ResultsTwenty-four patients (96%) presented with nocturia and 20 (80%) presented with nocturnal enuresis. DO was demonstrated in 19 (76%) patients (mean pressure 69.1±53.3 cmH2O). UUI was demonstrated in 16 (80%) out of the 20 patients who complained of nocturnal enuresis. Of the 19 patients with follow-up data, following overnight aUDS a change in urodynamic diagnosis was made in 15 patients (79%); 16 patients (84%) also had their clinical diagnosis and subsequent management changed; and 15 patients (79%) reported an improvement in their urinary symptoms following these changes in diagnosis and treatment. There was a significant improvement in ICIQ-OAB (120±44 versus 32±53, P < 0.0001) scores following the changes to clinical management post-overnight aUDS.ConclusionIn our study cohort, change in primary diagnosis following overnight aUDS led to a significant change in treatment care pathway and resulted in significant improvement in urinary symptoms at follow-up.","PeriodicalId":21961,"journal":{"name":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48083/rdtd8562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine the diagnostic value of overnight ambulatory urodynamics (aUDS) and to assess if a urodynamic diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO) or nocturnal enuresis resulted in a change in patient management and an improvement in their urinary symptoms.MethodsA retrospective review of 25 consecutive patients (28% male) with a median age of 38 years (range 18 to 86) having overnight aUDS for bothersome urinary symptoms of primarily nocturia and/or nocturnal enuresis following non-diagnostic conventional urodynamics between November 1998 and August 2018. Urinary symptoms were assessed before overnight aUDS and again after urological treatment following any changes in urodynamics diagnosis and treatment. Six patients were excluded as follow-up data were not available.ResultsTwenty-four patients (96%) presented with nocturia and 20 (80%) presented with nocturnal enuresis. DO was demonstrated in 19 (76%) patients (mean pressure 69.1±53.3 cmH2O). UUI was demonstrated in 16 (80%) out of the 20 patients who complained of nocturnal enuresis. Of the 19 patients with follow-up data, following overnight aUDS a change in urodynamic diagnosis was made in 15 patients (79%); 16 patients (84%) also had their clinical diagnosis and subsequent management changed; and 15 patients (79%) reported an improvement in their urinary symptoms following these changes in diagnosis and treatment. There was a significant improvement in ICIQ-OAB (120±44 versus 32±53, P < 0.0001) scores following the changes to clinical management post-overnight aUDS.ConclusionIn our study cohort, change in primary diagnosis following overnight aUDS led to a significant change in treatment care pathway and resulted in significant improvement in urinary symptoms at follow-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夜间流动尿动力学改变患者管理策略和改善症状结果
目的探讨夜间动态尿动力学(aUDS)的诊断价值,并评估尿动力学诊断为逼尿肌过度活动(DO)或夜间遗尿是否会改变患者的治疗方法和改善泌尿系统症状。方法回顾性分析1998年11月至2018年8月期间,连续25例患者(28%为男性),中位年龄38岁(18至86岁),在非诊断性常规尿动力学治疗后,因主要为夜尿症和/或夜尿症的泌尿系统症状而发生夜间aUDS。在夜间aUDS前评估泌尿系统症状,并在泌尿外科治疗后评估尿动力学诊断和治疗的任何变化。由于没有随访数据,6例患者被排除在外。结果夜尿24例(96%),夜尿20例(80%)。19例(76%)患者出现DO(平均血压69.1±53.3 cmH2O)。20例夜间遗尿患者中有16例(80%)出现UUI。在随访数据的19例患者中,15例患者(79%)在夜间aUDS后尿动力学诊断发生变化;16例(84%)患者的临床诊断和后续管理也发生了变化;15名患者(79%)报告说,在这些诊断和治疗的改变后,他们的泌尿系统症状有所改善。夜间aUDS后临床管理改变后,ICIQ-OAB评分显著改善(120±44比32±53,P < 0.0001)。结论在我们的研究队列中,夜间aUDS后的初诊改变导致治疗护理途径的显著改变,并导致随访时泌尿系统症状的显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education: A Bladder Cancer Consultation with ChatGPT Perioperative Blood Transfusion Is Associated with Worse Survival in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer RE: Prevalence of MRI Lesions in Men Responding to a GP-Led Invitation for a Prostate Health Check: A Prospective Cohort Study Quality and Readability of Google Search Information on HoLEP for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia A Quality and Completeness Assessment of Testicular Cancer Health Information on TikTok
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1