Simulating Hydrologic Effects of Wildfire on a Small Sub-Alpine Watershed in New Mexico, U.S.

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Transactions of the ASABE Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.13031/trans.13938
C. Moeser, K. Douglas-Mankin
{"title":"Simulating Hydrologic Effects of Wildfire on a Small Sub-Alpine Watershed in New Mexico, U.S.","authors":"C. Moeser, K. Douglas-Mankin","doi":"10.13031/trans.13938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highlights This study calibrated a hydrologic model for pre- and postfire conditions and simulated postfire hydrologic response. Postfire rainfall-runoff was more influenced by canopy and soil water factors and less by antecedent soil moisture (ASM). For moderate to low ASM, postfire streamflow responded linearly to precipitation; prefire showed little response. Postfire streamflow increased and shifted from baseflow- to runoff-dominated, and runoff occurred across all ASM. Abstract. Streamflow records available before and after wildfire in a small, mixed conifer, sub-alpine monsoonal dominated watershed in New Mexico provided a unique opportunity to calibrate a watershed model (PRMS) for pre- and postfire conditions. The calibrated model was then used to simulate the hydrologic effects of fire. Simulated postfire surface runoff averaged 14.7 times greater than prefire for the 29-year simulation period. The relationship between precipitation and streamflow changed dramatically after wildfire, largely from a decreased influence of antecedent soil moisture (ASM) and increased influence of canopy factors (less interception) and soil factors (greater hydrophobicity, less infiltration) in controlling surface runoff. For higher ASM, simulated pre- and postfire streamflow was similarly variable. However, for moderate and lower ASM, soil water storage was too low to contribute baseflow for either prefire or postfire conditions, and thus postfire streamflow maintained a linear, surface runoff-dominated response to precipitation, whereas prefire streamflow showed little response. Postfire streamflow efficiency increased with ASM from a mean of 0.02 at the lowest ASM to 0.30 at the highest ASM, whereas prefire conditions showed no sensitivity to ASM at low to moderate ASM. Postfire streamflow increased (2.1 times greater median flow than prefire), particularly from increased surface runoff (14.7 times greater), which occurred across all ASM conditions. As a result, streamflow shifted from baseflow-dominated to surface runoff-dominated after wildfire. This result indicates that substantial increases in runoff efficiency (20% or more of precipitation volume) can occur across a range of ASM postfire, which may have severe consequences for flooding. This result also indicates that monitoring of soil moisture would enhance raingauge networks for early flood warning.","PeriodicalId":23120,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the ASABE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the ASABE","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.13938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Highlights This study calibrated a hydrologic model for pre- and postfire conditions and simulated postfire hydrologic response. Postfire rainfall-runoff was more influenced by canopy and soil water factors and less by antecedent soil moisture (ASM). For moderate to low ASM, postfire streamflow responded linearly to precipitation; prefire showed little response. Postfire streamflow increased and shifted from baseflow- to runoff-dominated, and runoff occurred across all ASM. Abstract. Streamflow records available before and after wildfire in a small, mixed conifer, sub-alpine monsoonal dominated watershed in New Mexico provided a unique opportunity to calibrate a watershed model (PRMS) for pre- and postfire conditions. The calibrated model was then used to simulate the hydrologic effects of fire. Simulated postfire surface runoff averaged 14.7 times greater than prefire for the 29-year simulation period. The relationship between precipitation and streamflow changed dramatically after wildfire, largely from a decreased influence of antecedent soil moisture (ASM) and increased influence of canopy factors (less interception) and soil factors (greater hydrophobicity, less infiltration) in controlling surface runoff. For higher ASM, simulated pre- and postfire streamflow was similarly variable. However, for moderate and lower ASM, soil water storage was too low to contribute baseflow for either prefire or postfire conditions, and thus postfire streamflow maintained a linear, surface runoff-dominated response to precipitation, whereas prefire streamflow showed little response. Postfire streamflow efficiency increased with ASM from a mean of 0.02 at the lowest ASM to 0.30 at the highest ASM, whereas prefire conditions showed no sensitivity to ASM at low to moderate ASM. Postfire streamflow increased (2.1 times greater median flow than prefire), particularly from increased surface runoff (14.7 times greater), which occurred across all ASM conditions. As a result, streamflow shifted from baseflow-dominated to surface runoff-dominated after wildfire. This result indicates that substantial increases in runoff efficiency (20% or more of precipitation volume) can occur across a range of ASM postfire, which may have severe consequences for flooding. This result also indicates that monitoring of soil moisture would enhance raingauge networks for early flood warning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟野火对美国新墨西哥州亚高山小流域的水文效应
本研究校准了火灾前后的水文模型,并模拟了火灾后的水文响应。火灾后降雨径流受冠层和土壤水分因子的影响较大,受前期土壤水分的影响较小。在中低ASM区,火后流量与降水呈线性关系;Prefire反应不大。火灾后河流流量增加,并从基流为主转向径流为主,径流发生在所有ASM中。摘要在新墨西哥州的一个小型混合针叶树、亚高山季风主导的流域,野火前后的流量记录为校准流域模型(PRMS)提供了一个独特的机会,可以用于火灾前后的条件。校正后的模型用于模拟火灾的水文效应。在29年的模拟期间,模拟的火灾后地表径流平均是火灾前的14.7倍。森林火灾发生后,降水与径流的关系发生了显著变化,这主要是由于前土壤水分(ASM)对地表径流的影响减弱,而冠层因子(截流较少)和土壤因子(疏水性较大,入渗较少)对地表径流的控制作用增强。对于较高的ASM,模拟的火灾前和火灾后的流量也同样是可变的。然而,在中等和较低的ASM条件下,无论是在火灾前还是在火灾后,土壤储水量都太低,无法贡献基流,因此火灾后的径流对降水保持线性的、以地表径流为主的响应,而火灾前的径流则几乎没有响应。火灾后水流效率随ASM的增加而增加,从最低ASM的平均0.02增加到最高ASM的0.30,而火灾前条件对低至中等ASM不敏感。在所有ASM条件下,火灾后的流量增加了(比火灾前增加了2.1倍),特别是地表径流增加了(增加了14.7倍)。结果表明,山火发生后,径流由基流为主转向地表径流为主。这一结果表明,在火灾后的ASM范围内,径流效率(降雨量的20%或更多)可能会大幅增加,这可能对洪水产生严重后果。这一结果还表明,土壤湿度监测将增强洪水早期预警的雨量测量网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of the ASABE
Transactions of the ASABE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal publishes research that advances the engineering of agricultural, food, and biological systems. Submissions must include original data, analysis or design, or synthesis of existing information; research information for the improvement of education, design, construction, or manufacturing practice; or significant and convincing evidence that confirms and strengthens the findings of others or that revises ideas or challenges accepted theory.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Nutrient Management for Reducing Phosphorus Losses from Agricultural Areas. Effectiveness of Nutrient Management on Water Quality Improvement: A Synthesis on Nitrate-Nitrogen Loss from Subsurface Drainage. Comparison of Droplet Size, Coverage, and Drift Potential from UAV Application Methods and Ground Application Methods on Row Crops. Effectiveness of Conservation Crop Rotation for Water Pollutant Reduction from Agricultural Areas. Experimental Study on Critical Shear Stress of Cohesive Soils and Soil Mixtures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1