Effect of graded levels of red grape pomace (Vitis vinifera L.) powder on physiological and meat quality responses of Japanese quail

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/09064702.2021.1923796
C. M. Mnisi, V. Mlambo, C. Kumanda, A. Crafford
{"title":"Effect of graded levels of red grape pomace (Vitis vinifera L.) powder on physiological and meat quality responses of Japanese quail","authors":"C. M. Mnisi, V. Mlambo, C. Kumanda, A. Crafford","doi":"10.1080/09064702.2021.1923796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study evaluated the effect of dietary red grape pomace (RGP) powder on physiological and meat quality responses of Japanese quail. Three hundred quail birds were randomly distributed to five dietary treatments formulated as follows: a negative control diet without antibiotics (NegCon); a positive control diet with antibiotics (PosCon); NegCon diluted with RGP at a rate of 1.5% (RGP15), 3.5% (RGP35), and 5.5% (RGP55). Diet RGP55 promoted higher (p < 0.05) overall feed intake (934.3 g/bird) than diet RGP35 (809.2 g/bird). The NegCon diet promoted the highest breast meat lightness (L*) value (46.1) while the lowest value (42.7) was observed in RGP35 meat. In conclusion, quail birds reared on RGP-containing diets had similar physiological and meat quality parameters as those on the antibiotic-containing diet. An optimum inclusion level could not be determined using the physiological and meat quality responses, suggesting a need to investigate higher levels of dietary RGP.","PeriodicalId":35885,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"100 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2021.1923796","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the effect of dietary red grape pomace (RGP) powder on physiological and meat quality responses of Japanese quail. Three hundred quail birds were randomly distributed to five dietary treatments formulated as follows: a negative control diet without antibiotics (NegCon); a positive control diet with antibiotics (PosCon); NegCon diluted with RGP at a rate of 1.5% (RGP15), 3.5% (RGP35), and 5.5% (RGP55). Diet RGP55 promoted higher (p < 0.05) overall feed intake (934.3 g/bird) than diet RGP35 (809.2 g/bird). The NegCon diet promoted the highest breast meat lightness (L*) value (46.1) while the lowest value (42.7) was observed in RGP35 meat. In conclusion, quail birds reared on RGP-containing diets had similar physiological and meat quality parameters as those on the antibiotic-containing diet. An optimum inclusion level could not be determined using the physiological and meat quality responses, suggesting a need to investigate higher levels of dietary RGP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分级红葡萄渣粉对日本鹌鹑生理和肉质反应的影响
摘要本试验旨在研究饲粮中添加红葡萄渣(RGP)粉对日本鹌鹑生理和肉质反应的影响。将300只鹌鹑随机分为5种饲粮处理:阴性对照饲粮不含抗生素(NegCon);阳性对照饮食加抗生素(浦项康);用RGP稀释NegCon,稀释率分别为1.5% (RGP15)、3.5% (RGP35)和5.5% (RGP55)。饲粮RGP55促进总采食量(934.3 g/只)高于饲粮RGP35 (809.2 g/只)(p < 0.05)。NegCon组胸肉轻度(L*)值最高,为46.1,RGP35组胸肉轻度最低,为42.7。由此可见,饲粮中添加rgp的鹌鹑与饲粮中添加抗生素的鹌鹑具有相似的生理和肉质参数。根据生理和肉质反应,无法确定最佳的添加水平,这表明有必要研究更高水平的膳食RGP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science publishes results of original research in animal science and their applications related to the following topics: -Animal breeding and genetics -Molecular genetics -Animal physiology and reproduction -Nutrition and feeding -Animal behaviour and welfare -General animal husbandry and systems of production, including economic and technical aspects -Hygiene and quality of animal products In addition to original articles, covering basic as well as applied subjects, the journal features review articles and short communications. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science forms part of a trilogy of titles published on behalf of the Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists (NJF). The series also includes Section B - Soil & Plant Science and the recently launched Section C - Food Economics . Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A, B and C are available to purchase as a combined subscription. This provides access to all three journals in the series, and is available to institutional subscribers only. For full pricing information, please view the Taylor & Francis Journals Price List here. Scientists in research, teaching and extension with specialised interest in animal science and production.
期刊最新文献
A review on pale, soft, and exudative (PSE)-like zones in pork: current knowledge on underlying factors and identification of knowledge gaps for further research Exploring genetic polymorphisms and transcript levels of antioxidant and metabolic markers for prediction and monitoring diarrhea in Holstein dairy calves Rumen size of sheep: difference between a modern and a native Norwegian sheep breed Evaluation of the performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Hararghe-highland sheep drinking lake Basaka water with varying salinity levels at Haramaya university, Ethiopia How low can you go? Broiler breast muscle possesses a mitochondrial content of just 2%
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1