{"title":"Rice production in Telangana: growth, instability and decomposition analysis","authors":"Mounika Akula, Nirmala Bandumula, S. Rathod","doi":"10.35709/ory.2022.59.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the objectives of the study is to assess the growth of rice sector in Telangana and growth rate is the measurable indicator for assessing the growth. The present study was conducted to assess the growth rates and instability in the area, production, and yield of rice in Telangana. Also, the relative contribution of area and yield to change in output was estimated by decomposition analysis. The study is based on secondary data for a period of 30 years i.e., 1990-91 to 2019-20. The secondary data were obtained from various publications of the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of India and Directorate of Rice Development, Patna. For this study, the whole period (1990-91 to 2019-20) is divided into three sub-periods to have a period-wise examination of growth and instability patterns of the area, production, and productivity of rice and the sub-periods were as follows: period I (1990-91 to 1999-2000), period II (2000-01 to 2009-10) and period III (2010-2011 to 2019-20), and overall period (1990-91 to 2019-20). Compound Growth Rates were used to calculate the growth rates. The instability in area, production, and yield was measured with Cuddy Della Valle Index and Coppock's Instability. The study revealed that the growth rates for Telangana in the overall period were positive for the area, production, and yield (2.1%, 3.7%, and 1.5% respectively). The Cuddy Della Valle Index for the overall period registered higher, medium, and low instability for production (35.1), area (26.4), and yield (7.6) respectively. Coppock's Instability indices revealed that the degree of instability for area and production was higher during period III in comparison to periods I and II. One of the major reasons for this could be the increased area under rice in period III, because of the assured irrigation due to the completion of many major and minor irrigation projects and revival of tanks under Mission Kakatiya in Telangana. The decomposition analysis for the overall period (1990-91 to 2019-20) revealed that the area effect was highly responsible for the production variability (46.1 percent) in Telangana. The area effect in enhancing rice production increased over some time. Since the scope to further increase the area under rice cultivation is limited, the focus should be on the improvement of the yield to meet the future demand for rice.","PeriodicalId":17736,"journal":{"name":"June 1","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"June 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2022.59.2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
One of the objectives of the study is to assess the growth of rice sector in Telangana and growth rate is the measurable indicator for assessing the growth. The present study was conducted to assess the growth rates and instability in the area, production, and yield of rice in Telangana. Also, the relative contribution of area and yield to change in output was estimated by decomposition analysis. The study is based on secondary data for a period of 30 years i.e., 1990-91 to 2019-20. The secondary data were obtained from various publications of the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of India and Directorate of Rice Development, Patna. For this study, the whole period (1990-91 to 2019-20) is divided into three sub-periods to have a period-wise examination of growth and instability patterns of the area, production, and productivity of rice and the sub-periods were as follows: period I (1990-91 to 1999-2000), period II (2000-01 to 2009-10) and period III (2010-2011 to 2019-20), and overall period (1990-91 to 2019-20). Compound Growth Rates were used to calculate the growth rates. The instability in area, production, and yield was measured with Cuddy Della Valle Index and Coppock's Instability. The study revealed that the growth rates for Telangana in the overall period were positive for the area, production, and yield (2.1%, 3.7%, and 1.5% respectively). The Cuddy Della Valle Index for the overall period registered higher, medium, and low instability for production (35.1), area (26.4), and yield (7.6) respectively. Coppock's Instability indices revealed that the degree of instability for area and production was higher during period III in comparison to periods I and II. One of the major reasons for this could be the increased area under rice in period III, because of the assured irrigation due to the completion of many major and minor irrigation projects and revival of tanks under Mission Kakatiya in Telangana. The decomposition analysis for the overall period (1990-91 to 2019-20) revealed that the area effect was highly responsible for the production variability (46.1 percent) in Telangana. The area effect in enhancing rice production increased over some time. Since the scope to further increase the area under rice cultivation is limited, the focus should be on the improvement of the yield to meet the future demand for rice.
该研究的目标之一是评估特伦甘纳邦水稻部门的增长,增长率是评估增长的可测量指标。本研究旨在评估特伦甘纳地区水稻的生长速度和不稳定性、产量和产量。通过分解分析,估计了面积和产量对产量变化的相对贡献。该研究基于30年的二手数据,即1990-91年至2019-20年。二级数据来自印度政府经济和统计局和巴特那水稻发展局的各种出版物。本研究将整个时期(1990-91年至2019-20年)划分为三个子时期,对水稻面积、产量和生产力的生长和不稳定模式进行阶段性考察,子时期如下:第一阶段(1990-91年至1999-2000年)、第二阶段(2000-01年至2009-10年)和第三阶段(2010-2011年至2019-20年),以及总体时期(1990-91年至2019-20年)。采用复合增长率计算生长速率。采用Cuddy Della Valle指数和Coppock不稳定性测定了面积、产量和产量的不稳定性。研究显示,在整个时期,特伦甘纳邦的面积、产量和产量的增长率分别为2.1%、3.7%和1.5%。在整个时期,Cuddy Della valley指数在生产(35.1)、面积(26.4)和产量(7.6)方面分别显示出较高、中等和较低的不稳定性。Coppock不稳定指数显示,第三时期的面积和产量不稳定程度高于第一和第二时期。造成这种情况的一个主要原因可能是第三期水稻种植面积的增加,因为由于完成了许多大大小小的灌溉项目和在特伦加纳的Kakatiya特派团下恢复了储罐,灌溉得到了保证。对整个时期(1990-91年至2019-20年)的分解分析显示,面积效应对特伦甘纳邦的生产变化负有很大责任(46.1%)。随着时间的推移,水稻增产的面积效应逐渐增强。由于进一步增加水稻种植面积的范围有限,因此重点应放在提高产量以满足未来对水稻的需求上。