Aluerakenne, alueellinen erivertaisuus ja Suomen aluekehitys

S. Moisio, H. Sirviö
{"title":"Aluerakenne, alueellinen erivertaisuus ja Suomen aluekehitys","authors":"S. Moisio, H. Sirviö","doi":"10.30677/terra.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we draw on the work of Doreen Massey and David Harvey and think with the concept of spatial structure. We divide the concept into three constitutive elements: uneven geographical development (materiality), the discursive production of spatial structures (semiosis) and collective politics of spatial structure (experience). We conclude our argument with the concept of relational inequality and a call for rigorous examination of the history and current development of spatial structures in Finland and elsewhere from the perspective of the threefold conceptual frame presented in the paper. ","PeriodicalId":93720,"journal":{"name":"Terra Ameriga","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terra Ameriga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30677/terra.100115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper we draw on the work of Doreen Massey and David Harvey and think with the concept of spatial structure. We divide the concept into three constitutive elements: uneven geographical development (materiality), the discursive production of spatial structures (semiosis) and collective politics of spatial structure (experience). We conclude our argument with the concept of relational inequality and a call for rigorous examination of the history and current development of spatial structures in Finland and elsewhere from the perspective of the threefold conceptual frame presented in the paper. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文借鉴了多琳·梅西和大卫·哈维的研究成果,用空间结构的概念进行思考。我们将这一概念分为三个构成要素:不均匀的地理发展(物质性)、空间结构的话语生产(符号学)和空间结构的集体政治(经验)。我们以关系不平等的概念结束我们的论点,并呼吁从本文中提出的三重概念框架的角度严格检查芬兰和其他地方空间结构的历史和当前发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maantieteen ylioppilaskoe toimii alan näyteikkunana Ilmastoasenteiden maantiede: sosiospatiaalisuuden merkitys kansainvälisessä tutkimuskirjallisuudessa Puutiaisten (Ixodes ricinus ja Ixodes persulcatus) levinneisyyteen ja runsauteen vaikuttavat tekijät Suomessa Tietoliikenneyhteydet ja kuntien mahdollisuudet hyötyä digitalisaatiosta Onko maantieteellinen ajattelu kansalaistaito?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1