Family Matters: Immigrant Women’s Activism in Ontario and British Columbia, 1960s -1980s

M. Little, Lynne Marks, M. Beck, Emma Paszat, Lisa Tom
{"title":"Family Matters: Immigrant Women’s Activism in Ontario and British Columbia, 1960s -1980s","authors":"M. Little, Lynne Marks, M. Beck, Emma Paszat, Lisa Tom","doi":"10.7202/1074022ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article uses oral history interviews to explore the ways in which different attitudes towards family and motherhood could create major tensions between mainstream feminists and immigrant women’s activists in Ontario and British Columbia between the 1960s and the 1980s.  Immigrant women’s belief in the value of the family did not prevent immigrant women from going out to work to help support their families or accessing daycare and women’s shelters, hard fought benefits of the women’s movement.  However, these women demanded access to job training, English language classes, childcare, and women’s shelters on their own terms, in ways that minimized the racism they faced, respected religious and cultural values, and respected the fact that the heterosexual family remained an important resource for the majority of immigrant women.  \n \nImmigrant women activists were less likely to accept a purely gender-based analysis than mainstream feminists. They often sought to work with men in their own communities, even in dealing with violence against women. And issues of violence and of reproductive rights often could not be understood only within the boundaries of Canada. For immigrant women violence against women was often analyzed in relation to political violence in their homelands, while demands for fully realized reproductive rights drew on experiences of coercion both in Canada and transnationally.","PeriodicalId":80590,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis (Montreal, Quebec)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantis (Montreal, Quebec)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1074022ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article uses oral history interviews to explore the ways in which different attitudes towards family and motherhood could create major tensions between mainstream feminists and immigrant women’s activists in Ontario and British Columbia between the 1960s and the 1980s.  Immigrant women’s belief in the value of the family did not prevent immigrant women from going out to work to help support their families or accessing daycare and women’s shelters, hard fought benefits of the women’s movement.  However, these women demanded access to job training, English language classes, childcare, and women’s shelters on their own terms, in ways that minimized the racism they faced, respected religious and cultural values, and respected the fact that the heterosexual family remained an important resource for the majority of immigrant women.  Immigrant women activists were less likely to accept a purely gender-based analysis than mainstream feminists. They often sought to work with men in their own communities, even in dealing with violence against women. And issues of violence and of reproductive rights often could not be understood only within the boundaries of Canada. For immigrant women violence against women was often analyzed in relation to political violence in their homelands, while demands for fully realized reproductive rights drew on experiences of coercion both in Canada and transnationally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭事务:1960 -1980年代安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的移民妇女运动
本文采用口述历史访谈的方式,探讨了20世纪60年代至80年代安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的主流女权主义者和移民妇女活动家之间,对家庭和母性的不同态度是如何造成主要紧张关系的。移民妇女对家庭价值的信念并没有阻止移民妇女外出工作,帮助养家糊口,或进入日托中心和妇女庇护所,这些都是妇女运动来之不易的好处。然而,这些妇女要求以她们自己的方式获得职业培训、英语课程、托儿服务和妇女庇护所,以尽量减少她们所面临的种族主义、尊重宗教和文化价值观,并尊重异性恋家庭仍然是大多数移民妇女重要资源的事实。与主流女权主义者相比,移民女性活动家不太可能接受纯粹基于性别的分析。她们常常在自己的社区寻求与男子合作,甚至在处理对妇女的暴力行为方面也是如此。暴力和生殖权利问题往往不能只在加拿大境内理解。对移民妇女来说,对妇女的暴力行为往往是根据其祖国的政治暴力来分析的,而对充分实现生殖权利的要求则借鉴了加拿大和跨国的胁迫经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ode to M. Night Shyamalan Lands and Bodies: Disrupting Colonial Biases through Methodology Mis/classification: Identity-based Inequities in the Canadian and Global Post-secondary Context Walking Into Myself "I wish my mom was here." An Autoethnographic Account of Obstetric Violence in Mexican Healthcare Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1