o que podemos no encontro com a infância? um convite a um olhar heterotópico

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Childhood and Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-12-27 DOI:10.12957/childphilo.2021.62845
L. Borges, E. Menezes
{"title":"o que podemos no encontro com a infância? um convite a um olhar heterotópico","authors":"L. Borges, E. Menezes","doi":"10.12957/childphilo.2021.62845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to propose an invitation to look at the kind of childhood we have been constructing from the practices of Special Education, in articulation with the practices of Early Childhood Education. It problematizes the discursive webs formed in this articulation, considering the way that Special Education teachers working with Early Childhood in public schools regard childhood. Such discussions have derived from the uneasiness of thinking about how we have been producing childhood, given the policy of expanding mandatory attendance to four-year-old children. The analytical exercise, inspired by the discourse analysis proposed by Michel Foucault, has enabled us to question the production of subjects, truths and realities in the “confessions” of the interviewed teachers, in which we have identified two ways of thinking about and producing childhood: captured childhood, which is produced through the operationalization of normalization practices by Special Education, determined by the will to knowledge and the will to power over childhood; and childhood as heterotopy, produced as a powerful movement of resistance and denaturalization of normalizing practices – childhood regarded from other places, as an infinite, multiple, non-nameable, ever undetermined becoming, as an invitation to thought: what can we do in the encounter with childhood(s)?","PeriodicalId":42107,"journal":{"name":"Childhood and Philosophy","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.62845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to propose an invitation to look at the kind of childhood we have been constructing from the practices of Special Education, in articulation with the practices of Early Childhood Education. It problematizes the discursive webs formed in this articulation, considering the way that Special Education teachers working with Early Childhood in public schools regard childhood. Such discussions have derived from the uneasiness of thinking about how we have been producing childhood, given the policy of expanding mandatory attendance to four-year-old children. The analytical exercise, inspired by the discourse analysis proposed by Michel Foucault, has enabled us to question the production of subjects, truths and realities in the “confessions” of the interviewed teachers, in which we have identified two ways of thinking about and producing childhood: captured childhood, which is produced through the operationalization of normalization practices by Special Education, determined by the will to knowledge and the will to power over childhood; and childhood as heterotopy, produced as a powerful movement of resistance and denaturalization of normalizing practices – childhood regarded from other places, as an infinite, multiple, non-nameable, ever undetermined becoming, as an invitation to thought: what can we do in the encounter with childhood(s)?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在与童年的相遇中,我们能做什么?对异色外观的邀请
本文旨在结合幼儿教育的实践,从特殊教育的实践中审视我们一直在构建的儿童的类型。它提出了在这种表达中形成的话语网络的问题,考虑到在公立学校从事幼儿教育的特殊教育教师对儿童的看法。这样的讨论源于一种思考的不安,即我们是如何生产童年的,鉴于政策将强制性上学扩大到四岁儿童。受米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)提出的话语分析启发的分析练习,使我们能够质疑被采访教师的“自白”中主体、真理和现实的生产,其中我们确定了思考和生产童年的两种方式:捕获的童年,通过特殊教育规范化实践的操作化产生,由知识意志和对童年的权力意志决定;童年作为一种异位,作为一种强大的抵抗运动和正常化实践的变性而产生——童年从其他地方被视为一种无限的,多重的,不可命名的,永远不确定的成为,作为一种思考的邀请:我们在与童年的相遇中能做些什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
reinventando a prática alfabetizadora de paulo freire. uma experiência de alfabetização filosófica em Pau dos Ferros, RN Des-clasificar a Pinocho Cinema dos primeiros tempos, infância e a entrada na linguagem De la Filosofía para Niños indígenas a la Filosofía desde Niños indígenas: una propuesta desde la nosotrificación maya-tojolabal o governo da infância: para uma ontologia histórica do desenvolvimento infantil e a delimitação de modos de ser criança
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1