A Disruption Experiment

Cortney S. Rodet, Andrew Smyth
{"title":"A Disruption Experiment","authors":"Cortney S. Rodet, Andrew Smyth","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3435205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report results from a novel experiment where participants invest an endowment across multiple options, with investment in one option disrupting (reducing) the value of another option. While expected payoff maximization predicts the comparative statics of aggregate investment well, it does not precisely predict investment levels. However, when conditioned on observed investment in a riskless outside option, expected payoff maximization better predicts investment levels. At the participant level, investment variability increases in disruption.","PeriodicalId":14586,"journal":{"name":"IO: Productivity","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Productivity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3435205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report results from a novel experiment where participants invest an endowment across multiple options, with investment in one option disrupting (reducing) the value of another option. While expected payoff maximization predicts the comparative statics of aggregate investment well, it does not precisely predict investment levels. However, when conditioned on observed investment in a riskless outside option, expected payoff maximization better predicts investment levels. At the participant level, investment variability increases in disruption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
破坏性实验
我们报告了一个新实验的结果,在这个实验中,参与者将一笔捐赠投资于多个选项,其中一个选项的投资破坏(降低)了另一个选项的价值。虽然预期收益最大化能很好地预测总投资的比较静态值,但它不能精确地预测投资水平。然而,当以无风险外部期权的观察投资为条件时,预期收益最大化能更好地预测投资水平。在参与者层面,投资可变性在中断中增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Labour Productivity Improvements from Energy Efficiency Investments: The Experience of European Firms Green innovation downturn: the role of imperfect competition The Differential Impact of Intra-Firm Collaboration and Technological Network Centrality on Employees' Likelihood of Leaving the Firm Environmental Catastrophe and the Direction of Invention: Evidence from the American Dust Bowl An Industrial Organization Perspective on Productivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1