Error Management in Audit Firms: Error Climate, Type and Originator

A. Gold, Ulfert Gronewold, Steven E. Salterio
{"title":"Error Management in Audit Firms: Error Climate, Type and Originator","authors":"A. Gold, Ulfert Gronewold, Steven E. Salterio","doi":"10.2308/ACCR-50592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: This paper examines how the treatment of audit staff who discover errors in audit files by superiors affects their willingness to report these errors. The way staff are treated by superiors is labelled as the audit office error management climate. In a “blame-oriented” climate errors are not tolerated and those committing errors are punished. In contrast, an “open” climate characterizes error commitment as a normal, albeit unfortunate aspect of organizational life that offers opportunities for learning without sanctions on the originator. We examine error management climate in the context of audit-specific factors that might affect the decision to report errors: audit error type (conceptual or mechanical) and who committed the error (the individual who discovered it or a peer). An open climate results in an increase in the reporting of mechanical (but not conceptual) errors and all peer errors versus a blame climate. Post hoc findings suggest that one obstacle to reporting conceptual errors stem...","PeriodicalId":22240,"journal":{"name":"The Accounting Review","volume":"71 1","pages":"303-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ACCR-50592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This paper examines how the treatment of audit staff who discover errors in audit files by superiors affects their willingness to report these errors. The way staff are treated by superiors is labelled as the audit office error management climate. In a “blame-oriented” climate errors are not tolerated and those committing errors are punished. In contrast, an “open” climate characterizes error commitment as a normal, albeit unfortunate aspect of organizational life that offers opportunities for learning without sanctions on the originator. We examine error management climate in the context of audit-specific factors that might affect the decision to report errors: audit error type (conceptual or mechanical) and who committed the error (the individual who discovered it or a peer). An open climate results in an increase in the reporting of mechanical (but not conceptual) errors and all peer errors versus a blame climate. Post hoc findings suggest that one obstacle to reporting conceptual errors stem...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计事务所错误管理:错误气候、类型与始作俑者
摘要:本文考察了审计人员发现审计档案错误后,上级对其处理方式对其举报意愿的影响。上级对待员工的方式被称为审计办公室错误管理氛围。在“指责导向”的气候中,错误是不能容忍的,犯错误的人会受到惩罚。相比之下,“开放”的氛围将错误承诺视为正常的,尽管是组织生活中不幸的方面,它提供了学习的机会,而不会对发起人进行制裁。我们在审计特定因素的背景下检查错误管理氛围,这些因素可能会影响报告错误的决策:审计错误类型(概念性或机械性)和犯错误的人(发现错误的个人或同行)。开放的氛围导致机械性错误(而不是概念性错误)和所有同行错误的报告增加,而不是指责氛围。事后调查结果表明,报告概念错误的一个障碍是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of the Current Expected Credit Loss Model on Conditional Conservatism of Banks and Its Spillover Effect on Borrower Conservatism Switching Costs and Market Power in Auditing: Evidence from a Structural Approach Under the Hood of Activist Fraud Campaigns: Private Information Quality, Disclosure Incentives, and Stock Lending Dynamics Supervisor Impact on Employee Careers: The Role of Rating Differentiation Individual Auditor Turnover and Audit Quality—Large Sample Evidence from U.S. Audit Offices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1