Values of Academic Discourse: Responsibility and Truth. Case Studies: Sub-genres of Academic Discourse in the Humanities

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Dialogo Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.51917/dialogo.2023.9.2.6
Diana Hornoiu, A. Buzatu
{"title":"Values of Academic Discourse: Responsibility and Truth. Case Studies: Sub-genres of Academic Discourse in the Humanities","authors":"Diana Hornoiu, A. Buzatu","doi":"10.51917/dialogo.2023.9.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to problematize the scientific discourse in the field of humanities in the context of the fundamental changes that have taken place in the life, roles, and the socioeconomic and cultural impact of universities. The premise that drives the present research is the stringent need for conceptual and applied innovation to have an ethical dimension, to be supported by values such as responsibility and truth. The aim of this study is two-fold. First, it investigates two subgenres of scientific discourse, seen prototypically - (literary) text analysis and the linguistic corpus, to unravel how values are involved at any stage of scientific research, from the design of the approach to the interpretation and communication of research findings. Second, it bridges a gap in the specialized literature where there is little debate regarding the specific ways of putting these values into practice (i.e., into discourse). The paper demonstrates that the two subgenres under investigation, although much and obviously different, calibrate their tools and procedural scenarios by reference to the values of responsibility and respect.","PeriodicalId":42179,"journal":{"name":"Dialogo","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51917/dialogo.2023.9.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to problematize the scientific discourse in the field of humanities in the context of the fundamental changes that have taken place in the life, roles, and the socioeconomic and cultural impact of universities. The premise that drives the present research is the stringent need for conceptual and applied innovation to have an ethical dimension, to be supported by values such as responsibility and truth. The aim of this study is two-fold. First, it investigates two subgenres of scientific discourse, seen prototypically - (literary) text analysis and the linguistic corpus, to unravel how values are involved at any stage of scientific research, from the design of the approach to the interpretation and communication of research findings. Second, it bridges a gap in the specialized literature where there is little debate regarding the specific ways of putting these values into practice (i.e., into discourse). The paper demonstrates that the two subgenres under investigation, although much and obviously different, calibrate their tools and procedural scenarios by reference to the values of responsibility and respect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术话语的价值:责任与真理。个案研究:人文学科学术话语的子类型
本文的目的是在大学生活、角色以及社会经济和文化影响发生根本性变化的背景下,对人文学科领域的科学话语提出问题。推动当前研究的前提是对概念和应用创新的严格需求,以具有伦理维度,并得到诸如责任和真理等价值观的支持。这项研究的目的是双重的。首先,它研究了科学话语的两个子类型,即典型的(文学)文本分析和语言语料库,以揭示科学研究的任何阶段如何涉及价值,从方法的设计到研究结果的解释和交流。其次,它填补了专业文献中的空白,在这些文献中,关于将这些价值观付诸实践(即付诸话语)的具体方式几乎没有争论。本文表明,这两个被调查的子类型虽然有很大的明显的不同,但它们都参照责任和尊重的价值观来校准它们的工具和程序场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogo
Dialogo SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Free Will in Sufism Global Consciousness Project 2.0: A First Look Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humans Elements of Nation Branding at the Embassy of Romania in Dublin (2021-2023) The Metaphysics of Globalization in Gadamer: A Case Study of Contemporary Taiwan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1