Haematuria readmission rates in DOAC patients undergoing TURP/TURBTs and urinary tract biopsies – is there any need for a bridging plan?

Tavishi Kanwar, Alice Li
{"title":"Haematuria readmission rates in DOAC patients undergoing TURP/TURBTs and urinary tract biopsies – is there any need for a bridging plan?","authors":"Tavishi Kanwar, Alice Li","doi":"10.38192/1.7.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim - The purpose of our quality improvement project was to reduce readmission rates for haematuria in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) who had undergone a urinary tract biopsy or resection.\nMethods - For each cycle we used operating lists, pre-assessment clerking and departmental inpatient lists to identify the proportion of patients on DOACs readmitted post-operatively within 1 month from date of surgery. Cycle 1 was completed over a six-month period. We then discussed these results with a Haematologist, who advised a bridging plan with low-molecular weight heparin to mitigate the risk. Following implementation of the bridging plan, we then completed the second cycle over a three-month period.\nResults - The first cycle showed that 37.5% (n=16) of all patients on DOACs who had undergone one of these procedures were readmitted with significant haematuria. After implementation of the bridging plan with Low molecular weight heparin, the second cycle showed a reduced readmission rate of 33.3% (n=9), despite a higher percentage of patients on a DOAC in this cycle.\nDiscussion - There was no uniform practice or protocol for restarting DOACs in our hospital. After completion of this project, a uniform protocol has been established.\nRecommendations included: (1) rediscuss with a Haematologist whether further measures were needed; present our data at a regional meeting to survey protocol and practices in neighbouring hospitals. Limitations included: a small sample size; non-uniform duration of data collection per cycle; reduction of elective operative lists due to COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":75015,"journal":{"name":"The Homoeopathic physician","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Homoeopathic physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38192/1.7.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim - The purpose of our quality improvement project was to reduce readmission rates for haematuria in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) who had undergone a urinary tract biopsy or resection. Methods - For each cycle we used operating lists, pre-assessment clerking and departmental inpatient lists to identify the proportion of patients on DOACs readmitted post-operatively within 1 month from date of surgery. Cycle 1 was completed over a six-month period. We then discussed these results with a Haematologist, who advised a bridging plan with low-molecular weight heparin to mitigate the risk. Following implementation of the bridging plan, we then completed the second cycle over a three-month period. Results - The first cycle showed that 37.5% (n=16) of all patients on DOACs who had undergone one of these procedures were readmitted with significant haematuria. After implementation of the bridging plan with Low molecular weight heparin, the second cycle showed a reduced readmission rate of 33.3% (n=9), despite a higher percentage of patients on a DOAC in this cycle. Discussion - There was no uniform practice or protocol for restarting DOACs in our hospital. After completion of this project, a uniform protocol has been established. Recommendations included: (1) rediscuss with a Haematologist whether further measures were needed; present our data at a regional meeting to survey protocol and practices in neighbouring hospitals. Limitations included: a small sample size; non-uniform duration of data collection per cycle; reduction of elective operative lists due to COVID-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受TURP/ turts和尿路活检的DOAC患者血尿再入院率-是否需要桥接计划?
目的:我们的质量改进项目的目的是降低直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)患者在接受尿路活检或切除术后血尿的再入院率。方法:对于每个周期,我们使用手术名单、预评估记录和部门住院患者名单来确定DOACs患者术后1个月内再入院的比例。第一个周期在六个月期间内完成。然后我们与血液科医生讨论了这些结果,他建议用低分子量肝素进行桥接计划以降低风险。在桥接计划实施之后,我们在三个月的时间内完成了第二个周期。结果-第一个周期显示37.5% (n=16)的DOACs患者接受了其中一种手术后再次入院,伴有明显的血尿。在实施低分子量肝素桥接计划后,第二个周期的再入院率降低了33.3% (n=9),尽管在这个周期中使用DOAC的患者比例更高。讨论-在我们医院重新启动doac没有统一的实践或协议。本项目完成后,建立了统一的协议。建议包括:(1)与血液科医生重新讨论是否需要采取进一步措施;在区域会议上展示我们的数据,以调查邻近医院的协议和做法。局限性包括:样本量小;每个周期收集数据的时间不统一;减少新冠肺炎患者择期手术名单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research & Innovation Abstracts The Importance of an Innovation Culture in the NHS A World Without Childhood Blindness Metacognition for Every Clinician Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Prediction for Healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1