Beyond Beijing: May Fourth as a national and international movement

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q4 HISTORY Journal of Modern Chinese History Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17535654.2019.1688982
S. Rahav
{"title":"Beyond Beijing: May Fourth as a national and international movement","authors":"S. Rahav","doi":"10.1080/17535654.2019.1688982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The twenty-first century aboundswith centenaries of formative events that shaped the present and therefore with opportunities to commemorate and reflect on events of the previous century. What – if anything – did they mean? After commemorating the one hundredth anniversary of China’s RepublicanRevolution of 1911 and the beginning and ending ofWorld War I and on the eve ofmarking the centenary of the founding theChineseCommunist Party, we have arrived at the one hundredth anniversary of the May Fourth Movement. From our current vantage point, what seems to be the significance of the movement? One straightforward response was coined by Mao Zedong. In his seminal 1940 essay “On New Democracy,” Mao stated flatly that “since the May Fourth Movement things have been different.” For Mao the movement’s primary significance lay in paving the road to Communism, but the significance of May Fourth has always been contested. Historians and politicians have assigned the movement a variety of meanings, from cultural renaissance to patriotic awakening, from the advent of Marxism to the celebration of liberalism. Yet, as is often stated, history is ever changing reflecting the concerns of scholars and pundits about their own era. Hindsight provides many reasons to reflect anew about May Fourth. What does the movement mean given what we now know about the evolution of Communism in China, the alternate paths of Taiwan and Hong Kong, the embrace of market mechanisms in Deng Xiaoping’s time, and the New Era of Xi Jinping? What do language reform and cultural reform mean in the current era of globalization and the digital revolution? As the late twentieth century’s political order of liberal democratic nation-states faces severe challenges domestically from the rise of populist leaders and internationally from the rise of China and Russia and the weakening of the United States, the centenary of May Fourth beckons us to reflect on the meaning of this movement. Viewed from the perspective of our increasingly connected world, it might be time to conceive of May Fourth as a national and international movement. This proposition inevitably raises questions about the way in which ideas spread and the relation between ideas and political change.","PeriodicalId":41223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Chinese History","volume":"77 1","pages":"325 - 331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Chinese History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535654.2019.1688982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The twenty-first century aboundswith centenaries of formative events that shaped the present and therefore with opportunities to commemorate and reflect on events of the previous century. What – if anything – did they mean? After commemorating the one hundredth anniversary of China’s RepublicanRevolution of 1911 and the beginning and ending ofWorld War I and on the eve ofmarking the centenary of the founding theChineseCommunist Party, we have arrived at the one hundredth anniversary of the May Fourth Movement. From our current vantage point, what seems to be the significance of the movement? One straightforward response was coined by Mao Zedong. In his seminal 1940 essay “On New Democracy,” Mao stated flatly that “since the May Fourth Movement things have been different.” For Mao the movement’s primary significance lay in paving the road to Communism, but the significance of May Fourth has always been contested. Historians and politicians have assigned the movement a variety of meanings, from cultural renaissance to patriotic awakening, from the advent of Marxism to the celebration of liberalism. Yet, as is often stated, history is ever changing reflecting the concerns of scholars and pundits about their own era. Hindsight provides many reasons to reflect anew about May Fourth. What does the movement mean given what we now know about the evolution of Communism in China, the alternate paths of Taiwan and Hong Kong, the embrace of market mechanisms in Deng Xiaoping’s time, and the New Era of Xi Jinping? What do language reform and cultural reform mean in the current era of globalization and the digital revolution? As the late twentieth century’s political order of liberal democratic nation-states faces severe challenges domestically from the rise of populist leaders and internationally from the rise of China and Russia and the weakening of the United States, the centenary of May Fourth beckons us to reflect on the meaning of this movement. Viewed from the perspective of our increasingly connected world, it might be time to conceive of May Fourth as a national and international movement. This proposition inevitably raises questions about the way in which ideas spread and the relation between ideas and political change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北京之外:五四作为一场全国性和国际运动
二十一世纪充满了塑造当今世界的百年事件,因此也有机会纪念和反思上个世纪的事件。如果有的话,他们是什么意思?在纪念辛亥革命和第一次世界大战爆发和结束一百周年、中国共产党建党一百周年前夕,我们又迎来了五四运动一百周年。从我们现在的角度来看,这场运动的意义是什么?在他1940年的开创性论文《新民主主义论》中,毛直截了当地说:“自从五四运动以来,情况就不同了。”对毛来说,这场运动的主要意义在于为共产主义铺平道路,但五四的意义一直备受争议。历史学家和政治家给这场运动赋予了各种意义,从文化复兴到爱国觉醒,从马克思主义的出现到自由主义的庆祝。然而,正如人们常说的那样,历史是不断变化的,反映了学者和权威人士对自己时代的关注。事后诸葛亮提供了许多重新反思五四的理由。在当今全球化和数字革命的时代,语言改革和文化改革意味着什么?20世纪末,自由民主民族国家的政治秩序在国内面临着民粹主义领导人崛起带来的严峻挑战,在国际上面临着中国和俄罗斯崛起以及美国衰落带来的严峻挑战。五四百年纪念召唤我们反思这场运动的意义。从我们这个联系日益紧密的世界的角度来看,也许是时候把五四看作是一场全国性和国际运动了。这一命题不可避免地提出了关于思想传播方式以及思想与政治变革之间关系的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
460
期刊最新文献
A world of uncertainties: litigation and order in a flood irrigation society: three villages in southern Shanxi since late imperial times Sea changes of sandbanks and reclamation of shallows in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in the modern period Water politics: disputes about the “Yellow River-Huai River diversion proposal” in the 1930s The transformation and ecological impacts of drainage systems in modern Tianjin Development and ecological management of flood lands in Western Hebei from the perspective of environmental history (1937-1949)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1