Fit models, not fat models: body inclusiveness in the U.S. fit modeling job market

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.1080/21604851.2021.1913814
Kjerstin Gruys
{"title":"Fit models, not fat models: body inclusiveness in the U.S. fit modeling job market","authors":"Kjerstin Gruys","doi":"10.1080/21604851.2021.1913814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The extent to which the U.S. fashion industry is becoming more size- and shape- inclusive is highly contested. To assess whether or not this is occurring in women’s fashion, I draw from a content analysis of 162 online job advertisements for female fit models in the U.S. collected between 2012 and 2018. I show that fit modeling is, indeed, more size- and shape- inclusive than fashion modeling. However, when compared to the broader U.S. population, the sizes and shapes recruited in fit model ads are not inclusive. For example, only 16% of job ads recruited “plus-size” models, none recruited fit models larger than size 20/2X, and virtually all specified fit models with hourglass proportions. To the extent that fit models are selected because they mirror fashion brands’ “target customers,” these findings suggest that the U.S. fashion industry is not, in fact, becoming more size- and shape- inclusive.","PeriodicalId":37967,"journal":{"name":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","volume":"123 1","pages":"244 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2021.1913814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The extent to which the U.S. fashion industry is becoming more size- and shape- inclusive is highly contested. To assess whether or not this is occurring in women’s fashion, I draw from a content analysis of 162 online job advertisements for female fit models in the U.S. collected between 2012 and 2018. I show that fit modeling is, indeed, more size- and shape- inclusive than fashion modeling. However, when compared to the broader U.S. population, the sizes and shapes recruited in fit model ads are not inclusive. For example, only 16% of job ads recruited “plus-size” models, none recruited fit models larger than size 20/2X, and virtually all specified fit models with hourglass proportions. To the extent that fit models are selected because they mirror fashion brands’ “target customers,” these findings suggest that the U.S. fashion industry is not, in fact, becoming more size- and shape- inclusive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健美模特,而不是肥胖模特:美国健美模特就业市场的身体包容性
美国时尚产业在多大程度上正在变得更大的规模和形状的包容性是高度争议的。为了评估这种情况是否发生在女性时尚界,我对2012年至2018年间收集的162份美国女性模特在线招聘广告进行了内容分析。我的研究表明,与时装模特相比,适合模特的尺寸和体型确实更加包容。然而,当与更广泛的美国人口相比时,健美模特广告中招募的尺寸和形状并不包括在内。例如,只有16%的招聘广告招聘“大码”模特,没有招聘超过20/2X码的合适模特,而且几乎所有的招聘广告都规定合适模特是沙漏型身材。从某种程度上说,选择合适的模特是因为她们反映了时尚品牌的“目标客户”,这些发现表明,事实上,美国时尚业并没有变得更加包容尺码和体型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
“My heart’s fine as long as my stomach’s not empty”: patriarchal horror, women’s excess, and fat liberation in Criminally Insane War on fat in postwar Finland: A history of fat-shaming (Re)presenting The Big Grrrls Fat talk: parenting in the age of diet culture The Contemporary Reader of Gender and Fat Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1